Microbial Ecology

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 229–236 | Cite as

Progress Toward Understanding the Distribution of Accumulibacter Among Full-Scale Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Systems

Original Article

Abstract

This study investigated the role of Accumulibacter-related bacterial populations and factors influencing their distribution in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems in the USA. For this purpose, five full-scale wastewater treatment facilities performing EBPR were surveyed. The facilities had different configurations but were all treating primarily domestic wastewater. Two facilities had history of poor EBPR performance. Batch-scale acetate uptake and inorganic phosphate (Pi) release and uptake experiments were conducted to evaluate the EBPR activity of each sludge. Typical Pi and acetate profiles were observed, and EBPR activity was found to be positively correlated to polyphosphate (polyP)-accumulating organism (PAO) abundance, as determined by staining intracellular polyP. The abundance of Accumulibacter-related organisms was investigated using fluorescent in situ hybridization. Accumulibacter-related organisms were present in all full-scale EBPR facilities, at levels ranging from 9 to 24% of total cells. More than 80% of Accumulibacter-related organisms were estimated to have high polyP content, confirming their involvement in EBPR in these five facilities. However, Accumulibacter-related PAOs were only a fraction (40–69%) of the total PAO population. The variation of Accumulibacter-related PAO abundance among these EBPR systems suggests that multiple interacting factors such as wastewater characteristics and operational conditions are structuring PAO communities.

References

  1. 1.
    APHA AWWA, WEF (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beer M, Stratton HM, Griffiths PC, Seviour RJ (2006) Which are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full-scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia? J Appl Microbiol 100:233–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blackall LL, Crocetti GR, Saunders AM, Bond PL (2002) A review and update of the microbiology of enhanced biological phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment plants. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:681–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bond PL, Hugenholtz P, Keller J, Blackall LL (1995) Bacterial community structures of phosphate-removing and non-phosphate removing activated sludges from sequencing batch reactors. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1910–1916PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brdjanovic D, Logemann S, van Loosdrecht MCM, Hooijmans CH, Alaerts GJ, Heijnen JJ (1998) Influence of temperature on biological phosphorus removal: Process and molecular ecological studies. Water Res 32:1035–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brinch PP, Rindel K, Kalb K (1994) Upgrading to nutrient removal by means of internal carbon from sludge hydrolysis. Water Sci Technol 29:31–40Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christensson M, Lie E, Jonsson K, Johansson P, Welander T (1998) Increasing substrate for polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria in municipal wastewater through hydrolysis and fermentation of sludge in primary clarifiers. Water Environ Res 70:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crocetti GR, Hugenholtz P, Bond PL, Schuler A, Keller J, Jenkins D, Blackall LL (2000) Identification of polyphosphate accumulating organisms and the design of 16S rRNA-directed probes for their detection and quantitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1175–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Filipe CDM, Daigger GT, Grady CPL (2001) Stoichiometry and kinetics of acetate uptake under anaerobic conditions by an enriched culture of phosphorus-accumulating organisms at different pHs. Biotechnol Bioeng 76:32–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia Martin H, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Warnecke F, Barry K, McHardy AC, Yeates C, He S, Salamov A, Szeto E, Dalin E, Putnam N, Rigoutsos I, Kyrpides N, Blackall LL, McMahon KD, Hugenholtz P (2006) Metagenomic analysis of phosphorus removing sludge communities. Nat Biotechnol 24:1263–1269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goel RK, Sanhueza P, Noguera DR (2005) Evidence of Dechloromonas sp. participating in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) in a bench-scale aerated-anoxic reactor. Water Environment Federation 78th Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gu AZ, Saunders AM, Neethling JB, Stensel HD, Blackall LL (2007) Functionally relevant microorganisms to enhanced biological phosphorus removal performance at full-scale wastewater treatment plants in the US. Water Environ Res (in review)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hesselmann RPX, Werlen C, Hahn D, van der Meer JR, Zehnder AJB (1999) Enrichment, phylogenetic analysis and detection of a bacterium that performs enhanced biological phosphate removal in activated sludge. Syst Appl Microbiol 22:454–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jenkins D, Hermanowicz SW (1991) Principles of chemical phosphate removal. In: Sedlak, RI (Ed.) Phosphorus and nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater: Principles and practice. Lewis Publishers, New York, NY, pp 91–110Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kong Y, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH (2004) Microautoradiographic study of Rhodocyclus-related polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria in full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5383–5390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kong Y, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH (2005) Identity and ecophysiology of uncultured Actinobacterial polyphosphate-accumulating organisms in full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4076–4085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee N, Nielsen PH, Aspegren H, Henze M, Schleifer KH, Jansen JL (2003) Long-term population dynamics and in situ physiology in activated sludge systems with enhanced biological phosphorus removal operated with and without nitrogen removal. Syst Appl Microbiol 26:211–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mamais D, Jenkins D (1992) The effects of MCRT and temperature on enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water Sci Technol 26:955–965Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mino T, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1998) Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Water Res 32:3193–3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neethling JB, Bakke B, Benisch M, Gu AZ, Stephens HM (2005) Factors influencing the reliability of enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water Environment Research Foundation. Report 01CTS3Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saunders AM, Oehmen A, Blackall LL, Yuan Z, Keller J (2003) The effect of GAOs (glycogen accumulating organisms) on anaerobic carbon requirements in full-scale Australian EBPR (enhanced biological phosphorus removal) plants. Water Sci Technol 47:37–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schuler AJ, Jenkins D (2003a) Enhanced biological phosphorus removal from wastewater by biomass with different phosphorus contents, part I: experimental methods and results. Water Environ Res 75:485–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schuler AJ, Jenkins D (2003b) Enhanced biological phosphorus removal from wastewater by biomass with different phosphorus contents, part II: anaerobic ATP utilization and acetate uptake rates. Water Environ Res 75:499–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seviour RJ, Mino T, Onuki M (2003) The microbiology of biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:99–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smolders GJF, van der Meij J, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1994) Model of the anaerobic metabolism of the biological phosphorus removal process: Stoichiometry and pH influence. Biotechnol Bioeng 43:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stephens HL, Stensel HD (1998) Effect of operating conditions on biological phosphorus removal. Water Environ Res 70:362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stephens HM, Neethling JB, Benisch M, Gu AZ, Stensel HD (2004) Comprehensive analysis of full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal facilities. Water Environment Federation 77th Annual Conference and Exposition. New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Streichan M, Golecki JR, Schon G (1990) Polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria from sewage plants with different processes for biological phosphorus removal. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wagner M, Erhart R, Manz W, Amann R, Lemmer H, Wedi D, Schleifer K-H (1994) Development of an rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe specific for the genus Acinetobacter and its application for in situ monitoring in activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:792–800PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wong MT, Mino T, Seviour RJ, Onuki M, Liu WT (2005) In situ identification and characterization of the microbial community structure of full-scale enhanced biological phosphorous removal plants in Japan. Water Res 39:2901–2914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zilles JL, Peccia J, Kim M-W, Hung C-H, Noguera DR (2002) Involvement of Rhodocyclus-related organisms in phosphorus removal in full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2763–2769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaomei He
    • 1
  • April Z. Gu
    • 2
  • Katherine D. McMahon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin at MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations