Microbial Ecology

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 141–151 | Cite as

Application of a Novel rpoC1-RFLP Approach Reveals that Marine Prochlorococcus Populations in the Atlantic Gyres are Composed of Greater Microdiversity than Previously Described

  • Eleanor Jameson
  • Ian Joint
  • Nicholas H. Mann
  • Martin Mühling


To elucidate the degree of microdiversity within the genus Prochlorococcus, novel Prochlorococcus-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were developed for the rpoC1 gene, which encodes the ribonucleic acid (RNA) polymerase core subunit. The size of the PCR fragment (925 bp) coupled with high sequence variation within the rpoC1 fragments (70–99% sequence similarity, 16S ribosomal RNA sequences show greater than 97% sequence similarity) meant that it was possible to distinguish Prochlorococcus strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Clone libraries were constructed from environmental deoxyribonucleic acid samples from two stations, one in the northern and one in the southern oligotrophic gyre of the Atlantic Ocean. These were screened to determine the microdiversity of Prochlorococcus populations using this high-resolution high-throughput analysis approach. RFLP analysis of the clone libraries from the two gyre sites revealed that the two Prochlorococcus populations had a high degree of microdiversity with 40 and 52 different RFLP-type clones among the 143 clones tested for both the northern and southern gyres, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the RFLP types not only showed that it contained representatives of each of the currently recognized Prochlorococcus clades (based on the internal transcribed spacer region as molecular marker) but also led to the discovery of a previously unseen genetic microdiversity. This level of diversity was greater at the southern gyre site compared to the northern gyre site. Moreover, the high genetic resolution approach also revealed that there are two putative novel lineages within the HL I clade. Analyses of further samples by producing clone libraries from different geographic origins is likely to reveal further diversity and novel lineages within Prochlorococcus.


Internal Transcribe Spacer Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Clone Library Synechococcus Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank the captain and crew of the R.R.S. Discovery. In this study, CTD/underway data from the Atlantic Meridonial Transect Consortium (NER/0/5/2001/00680) was used, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC) and supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). This work was supported by a NERC research studentship (NER/S/A/2003/11883A) allocated to EJ. We thank Dr Dave Scanlan and Frances Pitt at the University of Warwick for supplying the Prochlorococcus cultures, Jane Heywood at the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, for providing flow cytometry data, and Katie Chamberlain (PML) for the nutrient data. Dr Paul J. Somerfield (PML) is thanked for his comments on the statistical analyses. This is contribution number 147 of the AMT program.


  1. 1.
    Ahlgren, N, Rocap, G, Chisholm, SW (2006) Measurement of Prochlorococcus ecotypes using real-time polymerase chain reaction reveals different abundances of genotypes with similar light physiologies. Environ Microbiol 8: 441–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouman, HA, Ulloa, O, Scanlan, DJ, Zwirglmaier, K, Li, WKW, Platt, T et al (2006) Oceanographic basis of the global surface distribution of Prochlorococcus ecotypes. Science 312: 918–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chao, A (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Statis 11: 265–270Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferris, MJ, Palenik, B (1998) Niche adaptation in ocean cyanobacteria. Nature 396: 226–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guillou, L, Jacquet, S, Chrétiennot-Dinet, MJ, Vaulot, D (2001) Grazing impact of two small heterotrophic flagellates on Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Aquat Microb Ecol 26: 201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heck, KL Jr, Van Belle, G, Simberloff, D (1975) Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56: 1459–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heiman, M (1997) Webcutter 2.0.
  8. 8.
    Herut, B, Zohary, T, Krom, MD, Mantoura, RFC, Pitta, P, Psarra, S, et al (2005) Response of east Mediterranean surface water to Saharan dust: on-board microcosm experiment and field observations. Deep-Sea Res Part 2 52: 3024–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holland, SM (2003) aRarefactWin.
  10. 10.
    Hurlbert, SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, ZI, Zinser, ER, Coe, A, McNulty, NP, Woodward, EMS, Chisholm, SW (2006) Niche partitioning among Prochlorococcus ecotypes along ocean-scale environmental gradients. Science 311: 1737–1740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ludwig, W, Strunk, O, Westram, R, Richter, L, Meier, H, Yadhukumar, et al (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1363–1371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mann, EL, Ahlgren, N, Moffett, JW, Chisholm, SW (2002) Copper toxicity and cyanobacteria ecology in the Sargasso Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 47: 976–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore, LR, Goericke, R, Chisholm, SW (1995) Comparative physiology of Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus: influence of light and temperature on growth, pigments, fluorescence and absorptive properties. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 116: 259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moore, LR, Rocap, G, Chisholm, SW (1998) Physiology and molecular phylogeny of coexisting Prochlorococcus ecotypes. Nature 393: 464–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore, LR, Post, AF, Rocap, G, Chisholm, SW (2002) Utilization of different nitrogen sources by the marine cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Limnol Oceanogr 47: 989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mühling, M, Fuller, NJ, Millard, A, Somerfield, PJ, Marie, D, Wilson, WH, Scanlan, DJ, Post, AF, Joint, I, Mann, NH (2005) Genetic diversity of marine Synechococcus and co-occurring cyanophage communities: evidence for viral control of phytoplankton. Environ Microbiol 7: 499–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mühling, M, Fuller, NJ, Millard, A, Somerfield, PJ, Post, AF, Wilson, WH, Scanlan, DJ, Joint, I, Mann, NH (2006) High resolution genetic diversity studies of marine Synechococcus using rpoC1-based restriction fragment length polymorphism. Aquat Microb Ecol 45: 263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Palenik, B (1994) Cyanobacterial community structure as seen from RNA polymerase gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 3212–3219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Partensky, F, Hess, WR, Vaulot, D (1999) Prochlorococcus, a marine photosynthetic prokaryote of global significance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 106–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Penno, S, Lindell, D, Post, AF (2006) Diversity of Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus populations determined from DNA sequences of the N-regulatory gene ntcA. Environ Microbiol 8: 1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rocap, G, Distel, DL, Waterbury, JB, Chisholm, SW (2002) Resolution of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus ecotypes by using 16S–23S ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 1180–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rocap, G, Larimer, FW, Lamerdin, J, Malfatti, S, Chain, P, Ahlgren, N et al (2003) Genome divergence in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation. Nature 424: 1042–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scanlan, DJ, West, NJ (2002) Molecular ecology of the marine cyanobacterial genera Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40: 1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shen, T-J, Chao, A, Lin, C-H (2003) Predicting the number of new species in further taxonomic sampling. Ecology 84: 798–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sullivan, MB, Waterbury, JB, Chisholm, SW (2003) Cyanophage infecting the oceanic cyanobacterium, Prochlorococcus. Nature 424: 1047–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suttle, CA (2000) Cyanophages and their role in the ecology of cyanobacteria. In: Whitton, BA, Potts, M (eds) The ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. Kluwer, London, UK, pp 563–589Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Urbach, E, Chisholm, SW (1998) Genetic diversity in Prochlorococcus populations flow cytometrically sorted from the Sargasso Sea and Gulf Stream. Limnol Oceanogr 43: 1615–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    West, NJ, Scanlan, DJ (1999) Niche-partitioning of Prochlorococcus in a Stratified Water Column in the Eastern North Atlantic Ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 2585–2591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zinser, ER, Coe, A, Johnson, ZI, Martiny, AC, Fuller, NJ, Scanlan, DJ, Chisholm, SW (2006) Prochlorococcus ecotype abundances in the North Atlantic Ocean as revealed by an improved quantitative PCR method. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 723–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zubkov, MV, Tarran, GA (2005) Amino acid uptake of Prochlorococcus spp. in surface waters across the South Atlantic Subtropical Front. Aquat Microb Ecol 40: 241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleanor Jameson
    • 1
  • Ian Joint
    • 1
  • Nicholas H. Mann
    • 2
  • Martin Mühling
    • 1
  1. 1.Plymouth Marine LaboratoryPlymouthUK
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations