Microbial Ecology

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 700–707 | Cite as

Diversity of Cultivated and Uncultivated Actinobacterial Endophytes in the Stems and Roots of Rice

  • Xinli Tian
  • Lixiang Cao
  • Hongming Tan
  • Weiqing Han
  • Ming Chen
  • Yuhuan Liu
  • Shining Zhou
Article

Abstract

A dual approach consisting of cultivation and molecular retrieval of actinobacterial 16S rRNA genes was used to characterize the diversity of actinobacterial community inhabiting interior of rice stems and roots. Streptomyces is the most frequently isolated genus from rice stems and roots. Forty-five clones chosen randomly among 250 clones in the 16S rRNA gene clone library from roots were affiliated with nine genera of actinobacteria and uncultured actinobacteria (Mycobacterium, Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Actinoplanes, Frankia, Dactylosporangium, Amycolatopsis, Corynebacterium, Rhodococcus, and uncultured actinobacterium). However, 33 clones from stems were affiliated with four genera and uncultured actinobacteria (Streptomyces, Mycobacterium, Nocardiodies, Janibacter, uncultured earthworm cast bacterium, uncultured earthworm intestine bacterium, and uncultured actinobacterium). Species similar to S. cyaneus were isolated from surface-sterilized roots and stems of rice and detected inside rice roots by culture-independent methods. Species similar to S. caviscabies, S. scabies, and S. turgidiscabies were simultaneously detected from the interior of rice stems by the culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. S. galilaeus was detected from the interior of rice stems and roots. These results indicated that some actinobacterial populations in rice stems were correlated with those in roots.

References

  1. 1.
    Cao, L, Qiu, Z, You, J, Tan, H, Zhou, S (2004) Isolation and characterization of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots. Lett Appl Microbiol 39: 425–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao, L, Qiu, Z, Dai, X, Tan, H, Lin, Y, Zhou, S (2004) Isolation of endophytic actinomycetes from roots and leaves of banana (Musa acuminata) plants and their activities against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20: 501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao, L, Qiu, Z, You, J, Tan, H, Zhou, S (2005) Isolation and characterization of endophytic streptomycete antagonists of Fusarium wilt pathogen from surface-sterilized banana roots. FEMS Microbiol Lett 247: 147–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Challis, GL, Hopwood, DA (2003) Synergy and contingency as driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(Suppl 2): 14555–14561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conn, VM, Franco, CMM (2004) Analysis of endophytic actinobacterial population in the roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing of 16S rRNA clones. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 787–1794Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coombs, JT, Franco, CMM (2003) Isolation and identification of actinobacteria from surface-sterilized wheat roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 5603–5608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crawford, DL, Lynch, JM, Whipps, JM, Ousley, MA (1993) Isolation and characterization of actinomycete antagonists of a fungal root pathogen. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 3899–3905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dees, PM, Ghiorse, WC (2001) Microbial diversity in hot synthetic compost as revealed by PCR-amplified rRNA sequences from cultivated isolates and extracted DNA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 35: 207–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dickinson, CH, Dawson, D, Goodfellow, M (1981) Interactions between bacteria, streptomycetes and fungi from Picea sitchensis litter. Soil Biol Biochem 13: 65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Embley, TM, Stackebrandt, E (1994) The molecular phylogeny and systematics of the actinomycetes. Annu Rev Microbiol 48: 257–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Germida, JJ, Siciliano, SD, Freitas, R, Seib, AM (1998) Diversity of root-associated bacteria associated with field-grown canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 26: 43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    González, I, Ayuso-Sacido, A, Anderson, A, Genilloud, O (2005) Actinomycetes isolated from lichens: evaluation of their diversity and detection of biosynthetic gene sequences. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 54: 401–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gremion, F, Chatzinotas, A, Harms, H (2003) Comparative 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA sequence analysis indicates that Actinobacteria might be a dominant part of the metabolically active bacteria in heavy metal-contaminated bilk and rhizosphere soil. Environ Microbiol 5: 896–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Großkopf, R, Janssen, PH, Liesack, W (1998) Diversity and structure of the methanogenic community in anoxic rice paddy soil microcosms as examined by cultivation and direct 16S rRNA gene sequence retrieval. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 960–969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Inbar, E, Green, SJ, Hadar, Y, Minz, D (2005) Competing factors of compost concentration and proximity to root affect the distribution of streptomycetes. Microb Ecol 50: 73–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kamilova, F, Validov, S, Azarova, T, Mulders, I, Lugtenberg, B (2005) Enrichment for enhanced competitive plant tip colonizers selects for a new class of biocontrol bacteria. Environ Microbiol 7: 1805–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knauth, S, Hurek, T, Brar, D, Reinhold-Hurek, B (2005) Influence of different Oryza cultivars on expression of nifH gene pools in root of rice. Environ Microbiol 7: 1725–1733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monciardini, P, Sosio, M, Cavaletti, L, Chiocchini, C, Donadio, S (2002) New PCR primers for the selective amplification of 16S rDNA from different groups of actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42: 419–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rintala, H, Nevalainen, A, Ronka, E, Suutari, M (2001) PCR primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene for the specific detection of streptomycetes. Mol Cell Probes 15: 337–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rothrock, CS, Gottlieb, D (1984) Role of antibiosis in antagonism of Streptomyces hygroscopicus var geldanus to Rhizoctonia solani in soil. Can J Microbiol 30: 1440–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scholthof, HB (2001) Molecular plant–microbe interactions that cut the mustard. Plant Physiol 127: 1476–1483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sessitsch, A, Reiter, B, Pfeifer, U, Wilhelm, E (2002) Cultivation independent population analysis of bacterial endophytes in three potato varieties based on eubacterial and Actinomycetes-specific PCR of 16S rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 39: 23–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smalla, K, Wieland, G, Buchner, A, Zock, A, Parzy, J, Kaiser, S, Roskot, N, Heuer, H, Berg, G (2001) Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 4742–4751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stach, TEM, Maldonado, LA, Ward, AC, Goodfellow, M, Bull, AT (2003) New primers for the class Actinobacteria: application to marine and terrestrial environments. Environ Microbiol 5: 828–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thirup, L, Johnsen, K, Winding, A (2001) Succession of indigenous Pseudomonas spp. and actinomycetes on barley roots affected by the antagonistic strain Pseudomonas fluorescens DR54 and the fungicide imazalil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 1147–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tian, XL, Cao, LX, Tan, HM, Zeng, QG, Jia, YY, Zhou, SN (2004) Study on the communities of endophytic fungi and endophytic actinomycetes from rice and their antipathogenic activities in vitro. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20: 303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tokala, RK, Strap, JL, Jung, CM, Crawford, DL, Salove, MH, Deobald, LA, Bailey, JF, Morra, MJ (2002) Novel plant–microbe rhizosphere interaction involving Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 and the pea plant (Pisum sativum). Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 2161–2171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weller, DM, Raaijmakers, JM, Gardener, BB, Thomashow, LS (2002) Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40: 309–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yuan, WM, Crawford, DL (1995) Characterization of Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 as a potential biocontrol agent against fungal root and seed rots. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 3119–3128PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xinli Tian
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lixiang Cao
    • 1
  • Hongming Tan
    • 1
  • Weiqing Han
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ming Chen
    • 1
  • Yuhuan Liu
    • 1
  • Shining Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol and Department of Biochemistry, College of Life SciencesZhongshan (Sun Yatsen) University GuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Shanghai Institute for Biological ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations