Microbial Ecology

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 716–724 | Cite as

Response of Microbial Community Composition and Function to Soil Climate Change



Soil microbial communities mediate critical ecosystem carbon and nutrient cycles. How microbial communities will respond to changes in vegetation and climate, however, are not well understood. We reciprocally transplanted soil cores from under oak canopies and adjacent open grasslands in a California oak–grassland ecosystem to determine how microbial communities respond to changes in the soil environment and the potential consequences for the cycling of carbon. Every 3 months for up to 2 years, we monitored microbial community composition using phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA), microbial biomass, respiration rates, microbial enzyme activities, and the activity of microbial groups by quantifying 13C uptake from a universal substrate (pyruvate) into PLFA biomarkers. Soil in the open grassland experienced higher maximum temperatures and lower soil water content than soil under the oak canopies. Soil microbial communities in soil under oak canopies were more sensitive to environmental change than those in adjacent soil from the open grassland. Oak canopy soil communities changed rapidly when cores were transplanted into the open grassland soil environment, but grassland soil communities did not change when transplanted into the oak canopy environment. Similarly, microbial biomass, enzyme activities, and microbial respiration decreased when microbial communities were transplanted from the oak canopy soils to the grassland environment, but not when the grassland communities were transplanted to the oak canopy environment. These data support the hypothesis that microbial community composition and function is altered when microbes are exposed to new extremes in environmental conditions; that is, environmental conditions outside of their “life history” envelopes.



We want to thank the Hopland Research and Extension Center and Charles Vaughn for support of this project, and David Harris and the University of California at Davis isotope facility for the use of their instrumentation. This work was made possible by financial support from the Kearney Foundation for Soil Science Research and California AES project 6117-H.


  1. 1.
    Abraham, WR, Hesse, C, Pelz, O (1998) Ratios of carbon isotopes in microbial lipids as an indicator of substrate usage. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4202–4209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, MF, Morris, SJ, Edwards, F, Allen, EB (1995) Microbe–plant interactions in Mediterranean-type habitats: shifts in fungal symbiotic and saprophytic functioning in response to global change. In: Moreno JM, Oechel WC (Eds.) Global Change and Mediterranean-type Ecosystems, Ecological Studies, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 287–305Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arao, T (1999) In situ detection of changes in soil bacterial and fungal activities by measuring 13C incorporation into soil phospholipid fatty acids from 13C acetate. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 1015–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balser, TC, Firestone, MK (2005) Linking microbial community composition and soil processes in a California annual grassland and a mixed-conifer forest. Biogeochemistry 73: 395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bardgett, RD, Kandeler, E, Tscherko, D, Hobbs, PJ, Bezemer, TM, Jones, TH, Thompson, LJ (1999) Below-ground microbial community development in a high temperature world. Oikos 85: 193–203Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bever, JD (1994) Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology (Tempe) 75: 1965–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bossio, DA, Scow, KM (1995) Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 4043–4050PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bossio, DA, Scow, KM, Gunapala, N, Graham, KJ (1998) Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microb Ecol 36: 1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buckley, DH, Schmidt, TM (2001) The structure of microbial communities in soil and the lasting impact of cultivation. Microb Ecol 42: 11–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Broughton, LC, Gross, KL (2000) Patterns of diversity in plant and soil microbial communities along a productivity gradient in a Michigan old-field. Oecologia (Berlin) 125: 420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Canals, RM, Herman, DJ, Firestone, MK (2003) How disturbance by fossorial mammals alters N cycling in a California annual grassland. Ecology 84: 875–881Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cavigelli, MA, Robertson, GP (2000) The functional significance of denitrifier community composition in a terrestrial ecosystem. Ecology 81: 1402–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eviner, VT, Chapin, FS (2003) Gopher-plant-fungal interactions affect establishment of an invasive grass. Ecology 84: 120–128Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felske, A, Wolterink, A, Van Lis, R, De Vos, WM, Akkermans, ADL (2000) Response of a soil bacterial community to grassland succession as monitored by 16s rRNA levels of the predominant ribotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 3998–4003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fierer, N, Schimel, JP (2002) Effects of drying–rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 777–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Downie, DE, Taskey, RD (1997) Soil characteristics of blue oak and coast live oak ecosystems. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-160, pp 65–73Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gastine, A, Scherer-Lorenzen, M, Leadley, PW (2003) No consistent effects of plant diversity on root biomass, soil biota and soil abiotic conditions in temperate grassland communities. Appl Soil Ecol 24: 101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gulledge, J, Schimel, JP (1998) Moisture control over atmospheric CH4 consumption and CO2 production in diverse Alaskan soils. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1127–113Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herman, DJ, Halverson, LJ, Firestone, MK (2003) Nitrogen dynamics in an annual grassland: oak canopy, climate, and microbial population effects. Ecol Appl 13: 593–604Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jackson, LE, Strauss, RB, Firestone, MK, Bartolome, JW (1990) Influence of tree canopies on grassland productivity and nitrogen dynamics in deciduous oak savanna. Agric Ecosyst Environ 32: 89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kampichler, C, Kandeler, E, Bardgett, RD, Jones, TH, Thomson, LJ (1998) Impact of elevated CO2 concentration on soil microbial biomass and activity in a complex, weedy, field model ecosystem. Global Change Biol 4: 335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kandeler, E, Tscherko, D, Bardgett, RD, Hobbs, PJ, Kampichler, C, Jones, TH (1998) The response of soil microorganisms and roots to elevated CO2 and temperature in a terrestrial model ecosystem. Plant Soil 202: 251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kowalchuk, GA, Buma, DS, de Boer, W, Klinkhamer, PGL, van Veen, JA (2002) Effects of above-ground plant species composition and diversity on the diversity of soil-borne microorganisms. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81: 509–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lundquist, EJ, Scow, KM, Jackson, LE, Uesugi, SL, Johnson, CR (1991) Rapid response of soil microbial communities from conventional, low input, and organic farming systems to a wet/dry cycle. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 1661–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miller, M, Palojarvi, A, Rangger, A, Reeslev, M, Kjoller, A (1998) The use of fluorogenic substrates to measure fungal presence and activity in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 613–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ringelberg, DB, Stair, JO, Almeida, J, Norby, RJ, O'Neill, EG, White, DC (1997) Consequences of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels for the belowground microbiota associated with white oak. J Environ Qual 26: 495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schimel, JP, Gulledge, JM, Clein-Curley, JS, Lindstrom, JE, Braddock, JF (1999) Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 831–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stark, JM, Firestone, MK (1996) Kinetic characteristics of ammonium-oxidizer communities in a California oak woodland–annual grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 28: 1307–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Waldrop, MP, Firestone, MK (2004) Altered utilization patterns of young and old soil C by microorganisms caused by temperature shifts and N additions. Biogeochemistry 67: 235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waldrop, MP, Firestone, MK (in press) Seasonal dynamics of microbial community composition and function in oak canopy and grassland soils. Microb EcolGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    White, DC, Ringelberg, DB (1998) Signature lipid biomarker analysis. In: Burlage RS, Atlas R, Stahl D, Geesey G, Sayler G (Eds.) Techniques in Microbial Ecology, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 255–272Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zelles, L, Bai, QY (1994) Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in environmental samples. Chemosphere 28: 391–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations