Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 583–595 | Cite as

Long-Term Field Release of Bioluminescent Sinorhizobium meliloti Strains to Assess the Influence of a recA Mutation on the Strains' Survival

  • W. SelbitschkaEmail author
  • M. Keller
  • R. Miethling-Graff
  • U. Dresing
  • F. Schwieger
  • I. Krahn
  • I. Homann
  • T. Dammann-Kalinowski
  • A. Pühler
  • C. C. Tebbe
Article

Abstract

A field release experiment was carried out to study the fate of the isogenic, firefly luciferase (luc) gene-tagged Sinorhizobium meliloti strains L1 (RecA) and L33 (RecA+) in the environment. Both strains were released at concentrations of approximately 106 cfu g−1 soil in replicate and randomized field plots, which had been sown with alfalfa (Medicago sativa). The survival of both strains during the following 7 years could be subdivided into three phases: a sharp decline for more than two orders of magnitude within the first 4 months (phase I), followed by fluctuations around an average number of 104 cfu g−1 soil for nearly 4 years (phase II), and a further decline to approximately 60 cfu g−1 (phase III). At most sampling dates, no significant differences in the survival of both strains were detected, indicating that the recA gene function was dispensable under these environmental conditions. During the field inoculation, both strains were dispersed accidentally by wind in small numbers to noninoculated field plots. Strain L33 established at a concentration of more than 103 cfu g−1 soil with subsequent seasonal fluctuations. Although strain L1 must have been disseminated to a similar extent, it could never be recovered from noninoculated field plots, indicating that the recA mutation interfered with the strain's capability to establish there. At the beginning of the field experiment, an indigenous alfalfa-nodulating population was below the limit of detection. In the following years, however, an indigenous population arose, which finally outcompeted both strains for saprophytic growth and alfalfa nodulation. RecA strain L1 was outcompeted for alfalfa nodulation slightly faster than its RecA+ counterpart L33. The diversity of the indigenous population was characterized by employing the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus polymerase chain reaction fingerprint method. Typing of 2731 root nodule isolates revealed a total of 38 fingerprint groups. More than 80% of the isolates could be grouped into six dominant fingerprint groups, indicating that a few dominant bacterial strain types had outcompeted the released strains.

Keywords

Field Plot Viable Count Alfalfa Plant Aerial Dispersal Sedimentation Plate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the BMBF (BEO 0311203, 0310547A) and the EU-TRAFFIC project (CT-0098-0483). We thank Bodo Koring, Thomas Schäfer, and Prof. Erwin Flaschel from the Department of Fermentation of Bielefeld University for the preparation of the bacterial cultures used in the release experiment.

References

  1. 1.
    Amarger, N (2002) Genetically modified bacteria in agriculture. Biochimie 84: 1061–1072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bashan, Y (1998) Inoculants of plant-growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnol Adv 16: 729–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beringer, JE (1974) R-factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol 84: 188–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosworth, AH, Williams, MK, Albrecht, KA, Kwiatkowski, R, Beynon, J, Hankinson, TR, Ronson, CW, Cannon, F, Wacek, TJ, Triplett, EW (1994) Alfalfa yield response to inoculation with recombinant strains of Rhizobium meliloti with an extra copy of dctABD and/or modified nifA expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 3815–3832PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bromfield, ESP, Wheatcroft, R, Barran, LR (1994) Medium for direct isolation of Rhizobium meliloti from soils. Soil Biol Biochem 26: 423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broughton, WJ, Jabbouri, S, Perret, X (2000) Keys to symbiotic harmony. J Bacteriol 182: 5641–5652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Casse, F, Boucher, C, Julliot, JS, Michel, M, Denarié, J (1979) Identification and characterization of large plasmids in Rhizobium meliloti using agarose gel electrophoresis. J Gen Microbiol 113: 229–242Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dammann-Kalinowski, T, Niemann, S, Keller, M, Selbitschka, W, Tebbe, CC, Pu¨hler, A (1996) Characterization of two bioluminescent Rhizobium meliloti strains constructed for field releases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 45: 509–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Bruijn, F (1992) Use of repetitive (repetitive extragenic palindromic and enterobacterial repetitive intergeneric consensus) sequences and the polymerase chain reaction to fingerprint the genomes of Rhizobium meliloti isolates and other soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 2180–2187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dresing, U, Hagen, M, Selbitschka, W, Pühler, A, Keller, M (1998) Reduced survival of a RecA deficient Sinorhizobium meliloti strain in sterile and non-sterile soil during heat stress. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 27: 327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dröge, M, Pühler, A, Selbitschka, W (1998) Horizontal gene transfer as a biosafety issue: a natural phenomenon of public concern. J Biotechnol 64: 75–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dröge, M, Pühler, A, Selbitschka, W (1999) Horizontal gene transfer among bacteria in terrestrial and aquatic habitats as assess by microcosm and field studies. Biol Fertil Soils 29: 221–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eardly, BD, Young, JPW, Selander, RK (1992) Phylogenetic position of Rhizobium sp. strain Or 191, a symbiont of both Medicago sativa and Phaseolus vulgaris, based on partial sequences of the 16 S rRNA and nifH genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 1809–1815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felsenstein, J (1988) Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu Rev Genet 22: 521–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagen, M, Pu¨hler, A, Selbitschka, W (1997) The persistence of bioluminescent Rhizobium meliloti strains L1 (RecA) and L33 (RecA+) in non-sterile microcosms depends on the soil type, on the co-cultivation of the host legume alfalfa and on the presence of an indigenous R. meliloti population. Plant Soil 188: 257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hartmann, A, Giraud, JJ, Catroux, G (1998) Genotypic diversity of Sinorhizobium (formerly Rhizobium) meliloti strains isolated directly from a soil and from nodules of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) grown in the same soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 25: 107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herrera-Cervera, J, Rodriguez-Alonso, FI, Olivares, J, Sanjuan, J (1997) Evaluation of the recA-based containment system in Rhizobium meliloti GR4. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 22: 49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirsch, PR (1996) Population dynamics of indigenous and genetically modified rhizobia in the field. New Phytol 133: 159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirsch, PR (2004) Release of transgenic bacterial inoculants—rhizobia as a case study. Plant Soil 266: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hirsch, PR, Spokes, JR (1988) Rhizobium leguminosarum as a model for investigating gene transfer in soil. In: Risk Assessment for Deliberate Releases: The Possible Impact of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms on the Environment, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 10–17Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jackson, DA, Somers, KM, Harvey, HH (1989) Similarity coefficients: measures of co-occurrence and association or simply measures of occurrence? Am Nat 133: 436–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knize, MG, Takemoto, BT, Lewis, PR, Felton, JS (1987) The characterization of the mutagenic activity of soil. Mutat Res 192: 23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lilley, AK, Bailey, MJ (1997) Impact of plasmid pQBR103 acquisition and carriage on the phytosphere fitness of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25: burden and benefit. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 1584–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lodwig, E, Poole, P (2003) Metabolism of Rhizobium bacteroids. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22: 37–78Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McInnes, A, Thies, JE, Abbott, LK, Howieson, JG (2004) Structure and diversity among rhizobial strains, populations and communities—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 36: 1295–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miethling, R, Wieland, G, Backhaus, H, Tebbe, CC (2000) Variation of microbial rhizosphere communities in response to crop species, soil origin, and inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti L33. Microb Ecol 40: 43–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morrissey, JP, Walsh, UF, O'Donnell, A, Moenne-Loccoz, Y, O'Gara, F (2002) Exploitation of genetically modified inoculants for industrial ecology applications. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81: 599–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Niemann, S, Pühler, A, Selbitschka, W (1997) Growth and nodulation competitiveness of Sinorhizobium meliloti L1 (RecA) is less than that of its isogenic strain L33 (RecA+) but comparable to that of two S. meliloti wild-type isolates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 47: 525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Niemann, S, Pühler, A, Tichy, HV, Simon, R, Selbitschka, W (1997) Evaluation of the resolving power of three different DNA fingerprinting methods to discriminate among isolates of a natural Rhizobium meliloti population. J Appl Microbiol 82: 477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    O'Flaherty, S, Moenne-Loccoz, Y, Boesten, B, Higgins, P, Dowling, DN, Condon, S, O'Gara, F (1995) Greenhouse and field evaluations of an autoselective system based on an essential thymidylate synthase gene for improved maintenance of plasmid vectors in modified Rhizobium meliloti. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 4051–4056PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pitkäjärvi, J, Räsänen, LA, Langenskiöld, J, Wallenius, K, Niemi, K, Lindström, K (2003) Persistence, population dynamics and competitiveness for nodulation of marker gene-tagged Rhizobium galegae strains in field lysimeters in the boreal climatic zone. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 46: 91–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Robleto, EA, Kmiecik, K, Oplinger, ES, Nienhuis, J, Triplett, EW (1998) Trifolitoxin production increases nodulation competitiveness of Rhizobium etli CE3 under agricultural conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 2630–2633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rome, S, Fernandez, MP, Brunel, B, Normand, P, Cleyet-Marel, JC (1996) Sinorhizobium medicae sp. nov., isolated from annual Medicago spp. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46: 972–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schneiker, S, Dröge, M, Keller, M, Lanka, E, Pühler, A, Selbitschka, W (2001) The genetic organization and evolution of the broad host range mercury resistance plasmid pSB102 isolated from a microbial population residing in the rhizosphere of alfalfa. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 5169–5181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schwieger, F, Willke, B, Munch, JC, Tebbe, CC (1997) Ecological pre-release risk assessment of two genetically engineered, bioluminescent Rhizobium meliloti strains in soil column model systems. Biol Fertil Soils 25: 340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schwieger, F, Dammann-Kalinowski, T, Dresing, U, Selbitschka, W, Munch, JC, Pühler, A, Keller, M, Tebbe, CC (2000) Field lysimeter investigation with luciferase-gene (luc)-tagged Sinorhizobium meliloti strains to evaluate the ecological significance of soil inoculation and a recA-mutation. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 859–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schwieger, F, Tebbe, CC (2000) Effect of field inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti L33 on the composition of bacterial communities in rhizospheres of a target plant (Medicago sativa) and a non-target plant (Chenopodium album)—linking of 16S rRNA gene-based single-strand conformation polymorphism community profiles to the diversity of cultivated bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 3556–3565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Selbitschka, W, Arnold, W, Priefer, UB, Rottschäfer, T, Schmidt, R, Simon, R, Pühler, A (1991) Characterization of recA genes and recA mutants of Rhizobium meliloti and Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae. Mol Gen Genet 229: 86–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Selbitschka, W, Pühler, A, Simon, R (1992) The construction of recA-deficient Rhizobium meliloti and R. leguminosarum strains marked with gusA or luc cassettes for use in risk-assessment studies. Mol Ecol 1: 9–19Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Selbitschka, W, Dresing, U, Hagen, M, Niemann, S, Pühler, A (1995) A biological containment system for Rhizobium meliloti based on the use of recombination-deficient (recA) strains. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 16: 223–232Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sessitsch, A, Howieson, JG, Perret, X, Antoun, H, Martinez-Romero, E (2002) Advances in Rhizobium research. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21: 323–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Somasegaran, P, Hoben, HJ (1994) Handbook for Rhizobia. Springer Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Toro, N (1996) Nodulation competitiveness in the Rhizobium– legume symbiosis. World J Microb Biol 12: 157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    US EPA 700 R-92-008 (1992) Monitoring small-scale field tests of microorganismsGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vance, ED, Brookes, PC, Jenkinson, DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    van Dillewijn, P, Soto, MJ, Villadas, PJ, Toro, N (2001) Construction and environmental release of a Sinorhizobium meliloti strain genetically modified to be more competitive for alfalfa nodulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 3860–3865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    van Dillewijn, P, Villadas, PJ, Toro, N (2002) Effect of a Sinorhizobium meliloti strain with a modified putA gene on the rhizosphere microbial community of alfalfa. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 4201–4208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    van Veen, JA, van Overbeek, LS, van Elsas, JD (1997) Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 121–135PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Selbitschka
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Keller
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Miethling-Graff
    • 3
  • U. Dresing
    • 1
  • F. Schwieger
    • 3
  • I. Krahn
    • 1
  • I. Homann
    • 1
  • T. Dammann-Kalinowski
    • 1
  • A. Pühler
    • 1
  • C. C. Tebbe
    • 3
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für GenetikUniversität BielefeldBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Staatliches Umweltamt DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  3. 3.Institut für Agrarökologie, Bundesforschungsanstalt für LandwirtschaftBrunswickGermany

Personalised recommendations