Microbial Ecology

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 239–245 | Cite as

Recovery of GFP-Labeled Bacteria for Culturing and Molecular Analysis after Cell Sorting Using a Benchtop Flow Cytometer

  • B.C. FerrariEmail author
  • G. Oregaard
  • S.J. Sørensen


Exciting opportunities exist for the application of simple fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to microbiology. The technology is widely available, but critical reports on the efficiency of cell sorting using benchtop instruments are lacking. It is vital that single cell sorting be of the highest purity possible. If purity is compromised detrital material or unwanted cells will be captured along with target cells of interest. Here, the isolation of fluorescent bacteria using a benchtop FACSCalibur-sort flow cytometer is described. The efficiency and purity of isolated cells was determined using fluorescence microscopy, culturing, and molecular analysis. To achieve high purity it was essential that the total event rate did not exceed 300 cells per second. This instrument was capable of recovering >55% sorted Escherichia coli cells, coupled with a purity exceeding 99%. However, the purity of recovered cells was substantially reduced (<25%) when the event rate increased. Cell sorting onto polycarbonate membranes did not reduce the ability of E. coli to form colonies, and sorting of ~1000 E. coli cells was sufficient for 16S rDNA amplification. Additionally, as few as 100 isolated Erwinia sp. carrying the gfp gene were amplified using seminested PCR targeting the single copy gfp gene. With such low numbers of bacteria being required for molecular identification, FACS can be achieved without the requirement for high-speed droplet cell sorters.


Green Fluorescent Protein Expression Sheath Fluid Average Recovery Rate Sterile dH2O Total Event Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was funded through an Australian Research Council Linkage International Award (LX0347172) and a postdoctoral grant, “Whole Cell Biosensors Applied in Microbiology,” through the Danish Natural Research council (21-02-0154). Gunnar Oregaard was supported by the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, projects BIOT99-KU-11. Thanks to Michael Gillings and Marita Holley for technical advice on 16S PCR.


  1. 1.
    Bernard, L, Courties, C, Dupperray, C, Schafer, H, Muyzer, G 2001A new approach to determine the genetic diversity of viable and active bacteria in aquatic ecosystems.Cytometry43314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrari, BC, Vesey, G, Davis, KA, Gauci, M, Veal, D 2000A novel two-color flow cytometric assay for the detection of Cryptosporidium in environmental water samples.Cytometry41216222Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrari, B, Attfield, P, Veal, D, Bell, P 2003Application of a novel fluorescent dye Beljian red to the differentiation of Giardia cysts.J Microbiol Methods52133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gasol, J, Zweifel, U, Peters, F, Fuhrman, J, Hagstrom, A 1999Significance of size and nucleic acid content heterogeneity as measured by flow cytometry in natural planktonic bacteria.Appl Environ Microbiol654475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gunasekera, T, Veal, D, Attfield, P 2002Potential for broad applications of flow cytometry and fluorescence techniques in microbiological and somatic cell analyses of milk.Int J Food Microbiol26731Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansen, LH, Ferrari, B, Sorensen, AH, Veal, D, Sorensen, SJ 2001Detection of oxytetracycline production by Streptomyces rimosus in soil microcosms by combining whole-cell biosensors and flow cytometry.Appl Environ Microbiol67239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 .
    Joux, F, Lebaron, P 2000Use of fluorescent probes to assess physiological functions of bacteria at single-cell level.Microbes Infect21523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klappenbach, J, Saxman, P, Cole, J, Schmidt, T 2001RRNDB: the ribosomal RNA operon copy number database.Nucleic Acids Res29181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lebaron, P, Servais, P, Agogue, H, Courties, C, Joux, F 2001Does the high nucleic acid content of individual bacterial cells allow us to discriminate between active cells and inactive cells in aquatic systems?Appl Environ Microbiol671775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porter, J, Edwards, C, Morgan, JAW, Pickup, RW 1993Rapid, automated separation of specific bacteria from lake water and sewage by flow cytometry and cell sorting.Appl Environ Microbiol593327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Power, M, Shanker, SR, Sangster, NC, Veal, D 2003Evaluation of a combined immunomagnetic separation/flow cytometry technique for epidemiological investigations of Cryptosporidium in domestic and Australian native animals.Vet Parasitol11221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shapiro, HM 1995Practical Flow CytometryAR LissNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silhavy, T, Berman, M, Enquist, L 1984Experiments with Gene FusionsCold Spring Harbour Laboratory PressCold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanaka, Y, Yamaguchi, N, Nasu, M 2000Viability of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in natural river water determined by the use of flow cytometry.J Appl Microbiol88228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Veal, DA, Deere, D, Ferrari, B, Piper, J, Attfield, PV 2000Fluorescent staining and flow cytometry for monitoring microbial cells.J Immunol Methods243191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wallner, G, Fuchs, B, Spring, S, Beisker, W, Amann, R 1997Flow sorting of microorganism for molecular analysis.Appl Environ Microbiol634223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weisburg, W, Barns, S, Pelletier, D, Lane, D 199116S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.J Bacteriol173697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yeates, C, Gillings, MR 1998Rapid purification of DNA from soil for molecular biodiversity analysis.Lett Appl Microbiol2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations