Microbial Ecology

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 50–62 | Cite as

Soil Microbial Community Response to Land Use Change in an Agricultural Landscape of Western Kenya

  • D.A. Bossio
  • M.S. Girvan
  • L. Verchot
  • J. Bullimore
  • T.  Borelli
  • A. Albrecht
  • K.M.  Scow
  • A.S. Ball
  • J.N. Pretty
  • A.M. Osborn


Tropical agroecosystems are subject to degradation processes such as losses in soil carbon, nutrient depletion, and reduced water holding capacity that occur rapidly resulting in a reduction in soil fertility that can be difficult to reverse. In this research, a polyphasic methodology has been used to investigate changes in microbial community structure and function in a series of tropical soils in western Kenya. These soils have different land usage with both wooded and agricultural soils at Kakamega and Ochinga, whereas at Ochinga, Leuro, Teso, and Ugunja a replicated field experiment compared traditional continuous maize cropping against an improved N-fixing fallow system. For all sites, principal component analysis of 16S rRNA gene denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles revealed that soil type was the key determinant of total bacterial community structure, with secondary variation found between wooded and agricultural soils. Similarly, phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis also separated wooded from agricultural soils, primarily on the basis of higher abundance of monounsaturated fatty acids, anteiso- and iso-branched fatty acids, and methyl-branched fatty acids in the wooded soils. At Kakamega and Ochinga wooded soils had between five 5 and 10-fold higher levels of soil carbon and microbial biomass carbon than agricultural soils from the same location, whereas total enzyme activities were also lower in the agricultural sites. Soils with woody vegetation had a lower percentage of phosphatase activity and higher cellulase and chitinase activities than the agricultural soils. BIOLOG analysis showed woodland soils to have the greatest substrate diversity. Throughout the study the two functional indicators (enzyme activity and BIOLOG), however, showed lower specificity with respect to soil type and land usage than did the compositional indicators (DGGE and PLFA). In the field experiment comparing two types of maize cropping, both the maize yields and total microbial biomass were found to increase with the fallow system. Moreover, 16S rRNA gene and PLFA analyses revealed shifts in the total microbial community in response to the different management regimes, indicating that deliberate management of soils can have considerable impact on microbial community structure and function in tropical soils.


Microbial Biomass Microbial Community Structure Microbial Biomass Carbon Total Enzyme Activity Continuous Maize 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Drs. Bossio and Girvan contributed equally to this work. The authors thank Margaret Edwards, James Rowe, Moses Mathuva, and Edith Anyango for their contributions to this research. We are grateful for the financial support of this research by the Rockefeller Foundation (Grant Number 2001-FS-089), the IMPALA project funded by the European Union (Grant Number ICAS4-CT-2000-30011), the Government of Italy, Syngenta, and Unilever.


  1. 1.
    Albrecht, A (2002) Improved fallow by legume plants (trees, shrubs and grasses) in Eastern and Southern Africa. Impact of soil biota (SOM, roots, BNF microbes, mycorrhiza, and soil fauna), improvement on bean and maize yields, soil organic matter dynamics and soil conservation. First Annual Report. IMPALA project, INCO-DEV (1998–2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrén, O, Bengtsson, J, Clarholm, M (1995) “Biodiversity and species redundancy among litter decomposers.” In: Collins, HP, Robertson, GP, Klug, MJ (Eds.), The Significance and Relation of Soil Biodiversity, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 141–151Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bååth, E, Frostegård, A, Pennanen, T, Fritze, H 1995Microbial community structure and pH response in relation to soil organic matter quality in wood-ash fertilized, clear-cut or burned coniferous forest soils.Soil Biol Biochem2229240Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beare, MH, Tian, G, Reddy, UM, Srivastava, SC 1997Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystems function: the role of decomposer biota.Appl Soil Ecol687108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Black, H, Okwakol, M 1997Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystems function: the role of termites.Appl Soil Ecol63753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borneman, J, Triplett, EW 1997Molecular microbial diversity in soils from Eastern Amazonia: evidence for unusual microorganisms and microbial population shifts associated with deforestation.Appl Environ Microbiol6326472653PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bossio, DA, Scow, KM 1998Impacts of carbon and flooding on soil microbial communities: phospholipid fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns.Microb Ecol35265278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bossio, DA, Scow, KM, Gunapala, N, Graham, KJ 1998Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles.Microb Ecol36112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brussaard, L, Hauser, S, Tian, G (1993) “Soil faunal activity in relation to the sustainability of agricultural systems in the humid tropics.” In: Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and the Sustainability of Tropical Agriculture. Proceedings of an International Symposium, Leuven, Belgium, 4–6 November 1991, 241–256Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buckley, DH, Schmidt, TM 2001The structure of microbial communities in soil and the lasting impact of cultivation.Microb Ecol421121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clegg, CD, Ritz, K, Griffiths, BS 1998Broad-scale analysis of soil microbial community DNA from upland grasslands.Anton Leeuwen Int J Gen Mol Microbiol73914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clegg, CD, Ritz, K, Griffiths, BS 2000%G+C profiling and cross hybridisation of microbial DNA reveals great variation in below-ground community structure in UK upland grasslands.Appl Soil Ecol14125134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davidson, EA, Ackerman,  IL 1993Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils.Biogeochem20161193Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doran, JW, Zeiss, MR 2000Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality.Appl Soil Ecol15311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Federle, TW (1986) “Microbial distribution in soil—new techniques.” In: Megusar, T, Ganthar, M (Eds.), Perspectives in Microbial Ecology, Ljubljana, pp 493–498Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Felske, A, Wolterink, A, van Lis, R, Akkermans, ADL 1998Phylogeny of the main bacterial 16S rRNA sequences in Drentse A grassland soils (The Netherlands).Appl Environ Microbiol64871879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fragoso, C, Brown, G, Parton, C, Blanchartg, E, Lavelle, P, Pashanasi, B, Senapati, B 1997Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystems function: the role of earthworms.Appl Soil Ecol61735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fredrickson, JK, Balkwill, DL, Zachara, JM, Li, SMW, Brockman, FJ, Simmons, MA 1991Physiological diversity and distributions of heterotrophic bacteria in deep Cretaceous sediments of the Atlantic coastal plain.Appl Environ Microbiol57402411Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gelsomino, A, Keijzer-Wolters, AC, Cacco, G, van Elsas, JD 1999Assessment of bacterial community structure in soil by polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis electrophoresis.J Microbiol Methods38l15Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giller, KE, Beare, MH, Lavelle, P, Izac, AMN, Swift, MJ 1997Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function.Appl Soil Ecol6316Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giller, KE 2001Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems, 2nd ed.CAB InternationalWallingford,UKGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Girvan, MS, Bullimore, J, Pretty, JN, Osborn, AM, Ball,  AS 2003Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils.Appl Environ Microbiol6918001809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gomes, NCM, Fagbola, O, Costa, R, Rumjanek, NG, Buchner, A, Mendona-Hagler, L, Smalla, K 2003Dynamics of fungal communities in bulk and maize rhizosphere soil in the tropics.Appl Environ Microbiol6937583766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haack, SK, Garchow, H, Odelson, DA, Forney, LJ, Klug, MJ 1994Accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretation of fatty acid methyl ester profiles of model bacterial communities.Appl Environ Microbio6024832493Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heneghan, L, Coleman, DC, Crossley, DA, Zou, X 1999Nitrogen dynamics in decomposing chestnut oak (Quercus pinus L.) in mesic temperate and tropical forest.Appl Soil Ecol13169175Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jimenez, JJ, Moreno, AG, Lavelle, P, Decaens, T, Angel, AF, Thomas, RJ (1996) “Ecology and biology of a new tropical earthworm Martiodrilus carimaguensis (Oligochaeta, Glossoscolecidae).” In: Swift, MJ (Ed.), The Biology and Fertility of Tropical Soils, Report of the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme, TSBF, pp 15Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kahindi, JHP, Woomer, P, George, T, Moreira, FMD, Karanja, NK, Giller, KE 1997Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and ecosystem function in the tropics: the role of nitrogen-fixing bacteria.Appl Soil Ecol65576Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kroppenstedt, Rm (1985) “Fatty acid and menaquinone analysis of actinomycetes and related organisms.” In: Goodfellow, M, Minnikin, DE (Eds.), Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics, Academic Press, London, pp 173–199Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lawton, JH, Brown, VK (1993) “Redundancy in ecosystem.” In: Schultz, ED, Moonet, HA (Eds.), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lundquist, E, Scow, K, Jackson, L, Uesugi, S, Johnson, C 1999Rapid response of soil microbial communities from conventional, low input, and organic farming systems to a wet/dry cycle.Soil Biol Biochem3116611675Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mafongoya, PL, Mpepereki, S, Dzowela, E, Mangwayana, E, Makonese, F (1996) “Soil biota: effect of pruning quality and the method of pruning placement on soil microbial composition.” In: Swift, MJ (Ed.), The Biology and Fertility of Tropical Soils, Report of the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme, TSBF, pp 31–32Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCaig, AE, Glover, LA, Prosser, JI 2001Numerical analysis of grassland bacterial community structure under different land management regimens by using 16S ribosomal DNA sequence data and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis banding patterns.Appl Environ Microbiol6745544559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Muyzer, G, de Waal, EC, Uitterlinden, AG 1993Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA.Appl Environ Microbiol59695700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nelson, DW, Sommers, LE (1994) “Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter.” In: Weaver, RW, Angle, S, Bottomley, P, Bezdicek, D, Smith, S, Tbatai, A, Wollum, A (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Microbial and Biochemical Properties, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 539–579Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nusslein, K, Tiedje, JM 1999Soil bacterial community shift correlated with change from forest to pasture vegetation in a tropical soil.Appl Environ Microbiol6536223626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oldeman, LR (1994) “The global extent of soil degradation.” In: Greenland, DJ, Szabolcs, I (Eds.), Soil Resilience and Sustainable Land Use, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 99–118Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Palm, CA, Swift, MJ, Woomer, PL 1996Soil biological dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture.Agr Ecosys Environ586174Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ponder, F, Tadros, M 2002Phospholipid fatty acids in forest soil four years after organic matter removal and soil compaction.Appl Soil Ecol19173182Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pretty, J 2002Agri-CultureEarthscanLondorGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Qafoku, NP, Van Ranst, E, Noble, A, Baert, G (2003) “Mineralogy and chemistry of variable charge soils.” In: Lal, R (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Salamanca, EF, Raubuch, M, Joergensen, RG 2002Relationships between soil microbial indices in secondary tropical forest soils.Appl Soil Ecol21211219Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sanchez, PA, Palm, CA, Szott, LT, Cuevas, E, Lal, R (1989) “Organic input management in tropical agroecosystems.” In: Coleman, DC, Oades, JM, Uehara, G (Eds.), Dynamics of Soil Organic Matter in Tropical Ecosystems, NifTAL Project, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, pp 125–152Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shannon, CE, Weaver, W 1949The Mathematical Theory of CommunicationUniversity of Dlinois PressChampaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Srivastava, SC (1996) “Microbial biomass and activity in dryland agriculture.” In: Swift, MJ (Ed.), The Biology and Fertility of Tropical Soils, Report of the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme, TSBF, pp 35Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Swift, MJ, Andren, O, Brussaard, L, Briones, M, Couteaux, M-M, Ekschmitt, K, Kjoller, A, Loiseau, P, Smith, P 1998Global change, soil biodiversity, and nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: three case studies.Global Change Biol4729743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Swift, MJ, Mafongoya, P, Ramakrishnan, PS (1998) “Soil biodiversity: an essential foundation for sustainable soil fertility.” In: Chopra, VL, Single, RB, Varma, A (Eds.), Crop Productivity and Sustainability: Shaping the Future. Proceedings of the 2nd International Crop Science Congress, New Delhi, IBH Publishers, New Delhi, pp 321–333Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tabatabai, MA, Bremner, JM 1969Use of p-nitrophenol phosphate in assay of soil phosphatase activity.Soil Biol Biochem1301307Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    ter Braak, CJF 1987Data Analysis in Community and Landscape EcologyCentre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, WageningenThe NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    ter Braak, CJF 1990CANOCO: A Fortranrogram for Canonical Community Ordination; Update NotesAgricultural Mathematics GroupWageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Voroney, RP, Winter, JP, Bayaert, RP (1993) “Soil microbial biomass C and N.” In: Carter, MP (Ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis Publishers, London, pp 277–286Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Waldrop, MP, Balser, TC, Firestone, MK 2000Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil.Soil Biol Biochem3218371846Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zelles, L, Bai, QY, Beck, T, Beese, F 1992Signature fatty acids in phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides as indicators of microbial biomass and community structure in agricultural soils.Soil Biol Biochem24317323Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zelles, L 1999Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterisation of microbial communities in soil: a review.Biol Fertil Soils29111129Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • D.A. Bossio
    • 1
    • 5
  • M.S. Girvan
    • 2
  • L. Verchot
    • 1
  • J. Bullimore
    • 2
  • T.  Borelli
    • 1
  • A. Albrecht
    • 1
    • 3
  • K.M.  Scow
    • 4
  • A.S. Ball
    • 2
  • J.N. Pretty
    • 2
  • A.M. Osborn
    • 2
  1. 1.World Agroforestry CenterICRAFNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of EssexColchesterUK
  3. 3.Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)ICRAFNairobiKenya
  4. 4.Department of Land, Air and Water ResourcesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  5. 5.International Water Management InstituteIWMIColomboSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations