Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Safety of gadoterate meglumine in children younger than 2 years of age

Abstract

Background

Few studies on the safety of gadolinium-based contrast agents have been performed in children with even fewer focusing on children younger than 2 years of age.

Objective

To assess the safety of gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem) in patients younger than 2 years of age by evaluating adverse events following contrast administration.

Materials and methods

Pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without contrast were prospectively enrolled and received a weight-based intravenous dose of gadoterate meglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). The occurrence of adverse events was assessed at the time of injection, 2 h after MRI, and by phone contact using a standard questionnaire 24 h after MRI. Adverse events were documented including the time of onset, duration of symptoms, intensity, causality and subsequent outcome. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patient information.

Results

One hundred fifty exams were completed in 150 patients (median age: 12.1 months, age range: 0.25–23 months; males: 56%). Almost all patients (97.3%) received sedation/anesthesia before and during MRI. Thirty-four adverse events were reported in 23 patients overall (15.3%; male: 73.9%; median age: 11 months, age range: 3–23 months). Within the initial 2 h after the injection, there was one report of transient flushing/warmth and one report of vomiting, the latter of which was related to drinking formula too soon after anesthesia. Twenty-two patients (14.7%), who had all received sedation/anesthesia, experienced minor adverse events within 24 h, most physiological. Fourteen patients (9.3%) reported emesis, eight (5.3%) reported transient flushing/warmth, seven (4.7%) reported nausea, one (0.7%) reported altered taste and one (0.7%) reported dizziness. No patient experienced anaphylaxis. Two patients (1.3%) reported allergic-like reactions, which consisted of wheezing or sneezing.

Conclusion

No patient experienced adverse events directly related to gadoterate meglumine. Only two adverse events were reported to have occurred in the initial 2 h after the exam, while the rest were reported on the 24-h follow-up call. The higher reported rate of adverse events in this study may be related to concomitant sedation/anesthesia as well as to overreporting from parents on the 24-h follow-up questionnaire. The study confirms a good safety profile for gadoterate meglumine in this very sensitive population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Xia D, Davis RL, Crawford JA, Abraham JL (2010) Gadolinium released from MR contrast agents is deposited in brain tumors: in situ demonstration using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Acta Radiol 51:1126–1136

  2. 2.

    McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF et al (2015) Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 275:772–782

  3. 3.

    Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H et al (2014) High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology 270:834–841

  4. 4.

    Kanda T, Fukusato T, Matsuda M et al (2015) Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulates in the brain even in subjects without severe renal dysfunction: evaluation of autopsy brain specimens with inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Radiology 276:228–232

  5. 5.

    Kanda T, Osawa M, Oba H et al (2015) High signal intensity in dentate nucleus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: association with linear versus macrocyclic gadolinium chelate administration. Radiology 275:803–809

  6. 6.

    White GW, Gibby WA, Tweedle MF (2006) Comparison of Gd(DTPA-BMA) (Omniscan) versus Gd(HP-DO3A) (Prohance) relative to gadolinium retention in human bone tissue by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Investig Radiol 41:272–278

  7. 7.

    Maximova N, Gregori M, Zennaro F et al (2016) Hepatic gadolinium deposition and reversibility after contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Radiology 281:418–426

  8. 8.

    Flood TF, Stence NV, Maloney JA, Mirsky DM (2017) Pediatric brain: repeated exposure to linear gadolinium-based contrast material is associated with increased signal intensity at unenhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 282:222–228

  9. 9.

    Fraum TJ, Ludwig DR, Bashir MR, Fowler KJ (2017) Gadolinium-based contrast agents: a comprehensive risk assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:338–353

  10. 10.

    Endrikat J, Dohanish S, Schleyer N et al (2018) 10 years of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a comprehensive analysis of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis reports received by a pharmaceutical company from 2006 to 2016. Investig Radiol 53:541–550

  11. 11.

    Behzadi AH, Zhao Y, Farooq Z, Prince MR (2018) Immediate allergic reactions to gadoliniums-based contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 286:471–482

  12. 12.

    de Kerviler E, Maravilla K, Meder JF et al (2016) Adverse reactions to gadoterate meglumine: review of over 25 years of clinical use and more than 50 million doses. Investig Radiol 51:544–551

  13. 13.

    McDonald JS, Hunt CH, Kolbe AB et al (2019) Acute adverse events following gadolinium-based contrast agent administration: a single-center retrospective study of 281,945 injections. Radiology 292:620–627

  14. 14.

    Port M, Idée JM, Medina C et al (2008) Efficiency, thermodynamic and kinetic stability of marketed gadolinium chelates and their possible clinical consequences: a critical review. Biometals 21:469–490

  15. 15.

    Idée JM, Port M, Robic C et al (2009) Role of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters in gadolinium chelate stability. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1249–1258

  16. 16.

    Guerbet LLC (2018) Dotarem (gadoterate meglumine) [package insert]. Princeton

  17. 17.

    Aldrete JA (1995) The post-anesthesia recover score revisited. J Clin Anesth 7:89–91

  18. 18.

    American College of Radiology (2018) ACR Manual on Contrast Media. Version 10.3. https://www.acr.org/ClinicalResources/Contrast-Manual. Accessed 25 Sept 2019

  19. 19.

    Microsoft (2016) Excel Version 1.5 [computer software]

  20. 20.

    Maple Tech International, LLC (2008–2019). Calculator.net [computer software]. https://www.calculator.net/standard-deviation-calculator.html. Accessed 25 Sept 2019

  21. 21.

    Dillman JR, Trout AT, Davenport MS (2018) Allergic-like contrast media reaction management in children. Pediatr Radiol 48:1688–1694

  22. 22.

    Dillman JR, Strouse PJ, Ellis JH et al (2007) Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to i.v. nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1643–1647

  23. 23.

    Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T et al (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 175:621–628

  24. 24.

    Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH et al (2007) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing I.V. contrast media in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1533–1538

  25. 25.

    Chang DH, Pracros JP (2019) Safety of gadoterate meglumine in over 1600 children included in the prospective observational SECURE study. Acta Radiol 60:1450–1456

  26. 26.

    Balassy C, Roberts D, Miller SF (2015) Safety and efficacy of gadoteric acid in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: overview of clinical trials and post-marketing studies. Pediatr Radiol 45:1831–1841

  27. 27.

    Maurer M, Heine O, Wolf M et al (2012) Tolerability and diagnostic value of gadoteric acid in the general population and in patients with risk factors: result in more than 84,000 patients. Eur J Radiol 81:885–890

  28. 28.

    Emond S, Brunelle F (2011) Gd-DOTA administration at MRI in children younger than 18 months of age: immediate adverse reactions. Pediatr Radiol 41:1401–1406

  29. 29.

    Scala M, Koob M, de Buttet S et al (2018) A pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety study of gadoterate meglumine in pediatric subjects aged younger than 2 years. Investig Radiol 53:70–79

  30. 30.

    Briand Y, Neiss AC, Vitry A (1992) Efficacy and safety of the macrocyclic complex Gd-DOTA in children: results of a multi-Centre study. Proceedings of the 29th congress of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, 128

  31. 31.

    Neiss AC, Le Mignon MM, Vitry A, Caille JM (1991) Efficacy and safety of DOTA-Gd from a European multicenter survey. Rev Im Med 3:383–387

  32. 32.

    Ishiguchi T, Takahashi S (2010) Safety of gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) as a contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging: results of a post-marketing surveillance study in Japan. Drugs R D 10:133–145

  33. 33.

    Forbes-Amrhein MM, Dillman JR et al (2018) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to intravenously administered gadolinium-based contrast media in children. Investig Radiol 53:313–318

  34. 34.

    Choi WJ, Choi SI, Mok JM et al (2010) Recurrent unilateral lung ventilation disorder in a patient that experienced rocuronium-induced anaphylactic bronchospasm during laparoscopic rectal surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 59:275–278

  35. 35.

    Morimoto Y, Satake S, Kamitani A et al (2018) Rocuronium anaphylaxis in a 7-year-old boy during the induction of anesthesia. Immunol Med 41:85–88

  36. 36.

    Kim JM, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Koo BN (2013) Comparison of emergence time in children undergoing minor surgery according to anesthetic: desflurane and sevoflurance. Yonsei Med J 54:732–738

  37. 37.

    Bedirli N, Işik B, Bashiri M et al (2018) Clinically suspected anaphylaxis induced by sugammadex in a patient with weaver syndrome undergoing restrictive mammoplasty surgery. Clin Case Report 97:e9661

  38. 38.

    Çolak A, Yilmaz E, Kiray BK (2018) Sugammadex-induced hypersensitivity reaction in a pediatric patient. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 46:66–68

  39. 39.

    Maruishi Pharmaceutical Company. Ultane (sevoflurane) [package insert]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Revised April 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/020478s030lbl.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2019

  40. 40.

    Merck & Co., Inc. (2015) Bridion (sugammadex) [package insert]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/022225lbl.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2019

  41. 41.

    Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. (2008) Rocuronium bromide [package insert]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2008/078717s000lbl.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2019

  42. 42.

    Kopp AF, Mortele KJ, Cho YD et al (2008) Prevalence of acute reactions to iopromide: postmarketing surveillance study of 74,717 patients. Acta Radiol 49:902–911

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding support was provided through an investigator-initiated grant provided by Guerbet, LLC.

Author information

Correspondence to Shannon G. Farmakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Farmakis has research grants from GE Healthcare and Guerbet, LLC, and is a consultant for GE Precision Healthcare, LLC.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farmakis, S.G., Hardy, A.K., Mahmoud, S.Y. et al. Safety of gadoterate meglumine in children younger than 2 years of age. Pediatr Radiol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04626-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Children
  • Dotarem
  • Gadoterate meglumine
  • Infants
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Safety