Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 49, Issue 12, pp 1669–1677 | Cite as

The borderline dysplastic hip: when and how is it abnormal?

  • Sarah D. BixbyEmail author
  • Michael B. Millis
Musculoskeletal imaging
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Borderline acetabular dysplasia refers to mildly sub-normal patterns of acetabular shape and coverage that might predispose children to mechanical dysfunction and instability. Borderline dysplasia generally includes children with a lateral center edge angle (CEA) of 18–24°. Some children with borderline radiographic measurements have normal joint mechanics and function while others benefit from acetabular reorienting surgery. Although radiographic findings of borderline dysplasia might suggest instability, the ultimate diagnosis is based on history and physical exam in addition to imaging. Children with borderline acetabular dysplasia sometimes benefit from other cross-sectional imaging studies such as MR imaging to evaluate for secondary evidence of instability, including damage along the acetabular rim, or labral degeneration and hypertrophy. CT is also helpful for depiction of 3-D acetabular morphology for preoperative assessment and planning. Pediatric radiologists are often the first to identify borderline or mild dysplasia on radiographs. It is imperative that pediatric radiologists serve as effective consultants and offer appropriate recommendations as part of a cohesive multidisciplinary approach to this complex patient population.

Keywords

Acetabular dysplasia Adolescents Children Developmental hip dysplasia Hip Radiography 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Graf R (1984) Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 102:248–255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Graf R (1984) Fundamentals of sonographic diagnosis of infant hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 4:735–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gala L, Clohisy JC, Beaule PE (2016) Hip dysplasia in the young adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:63–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millis MB, Kim YJ (2002) Rationale of osteotomy and related procedures for hip preservation: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405:108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiberg G (1939) Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. With special references to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand 83:28–38Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee CB, Mata-Fink A, Millis MB, Kim YJ (2013) Demographic differences in adolescent-diagnosed and adult-diagnosed acetabular dysplasia compared with infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 33:107–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delaunay D, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA, Alford BA (1997) Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skelet Radiol 26:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beltran LS, Rosenberg ZS, Mayo JD et al (2013) Imaging evaluation of developmental hip dysplasia in the young adult. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:1077–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilkin GP, Ibrahim MM, Smit KM, Beaule PE (2017) A contemporary definition of hip dysplasia and structural instability: toward a comprehensive classification for acetabular dysplasia. J Arthroplast 32:S20–S27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lequesne M (2002) The false profile view of the hip: role, interest, economic considerations. Joint Bone Spine 69:109–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Putnam SM, Clohisy JC, Nepple JJ (2019) Do changes in pelvic rotation and tilt affect measurement of the anterior center edge angle on false profile radiographs? A cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1066–1072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wyatt MC, Beck M (2018) The management of the painful borderline dysplastic hip. J Hip Preserv Surg 5:105–112PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McClincy MP, Wylie JD, Kim YJ et al (2018) Periacetabular osteotomy improves pain and function in patients with lateral center-edge angle between 18° and 25°, but are these hips really borderline dysplastic? Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1145–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McClincy MP, Wylie JD, Yen YM, Novais EN (2019) Mild or borderline hip dysplasia: are we characterizing hips with a lateral center-edge angle between 18 and 25 degrees appropriately? Am J Sports Med 47:112–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCarthy JC, Lee JA (2002) Acetabular dysplasia: a paradigm of arthroscopic examination of chondral injuries. Clin Orthop Rel Res 405:122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murphy SB, Ganz R, Muller ME (1995) The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:985–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim YJ, Jaramillo D, Millis MB et al (2003) Assessment of early osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia with delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1987–1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Omeroglu H, Biçmoglu A, Agus H, Tümer Y (2002) Measurement of center-edge angle in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a comparison of two methods in patients under 20 years of age. Skelet Radiol 31:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carlisle JC, Zebala LP, Shia DS et al (2011) Reliability of various observers in determining common radiographic parameters of adult hip structural anatomy. Iowa Orthop J 31:52–58PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R et al (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:666–675PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bensler S, Dietrich TJ, Zubler V et al (2018) Pincer-type MRI morphology seen in over a third of asymptomatic healthy volunteers without femoroacetabular impingement. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:1296–1303PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nepple JJ, Martell JM, Kim YJ et al (2014) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements. Am J Sports Med 42:2393–2401PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tannast M, Mistry S, Steppacher SD et al (2008) Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm — reliable and validated. J Orthop Res 26:1199–1205PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC et al (2007) Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the “cross-over-sign”. J Orthop Res 25:758–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zaltz I, Kelly BT, Hetsroni I, Bedi A (2013) The crossover sign overestimates acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2463–2470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Larson CM, Moreau-Gaudry A, Kelly BT et al (2015) Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1247–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis — what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1540–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nepple JJ, Lehmann CL, Ross JR et al (2013) Coxa profunda is not a useful radiographic parameter for diagnosing pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:417–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anderson LA, Kapron AL, Aoki SK, Peters CL (2012) Coxa profunda: is the deep acetabulum overcovered? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3375–3382PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Diesel CV, Ribeiro TA, Coussirat C et al (2015) Coxa profunda in the diagnosis of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement and its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects. Bone Joint J 97-B:478–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brian P, Bernard S, Flemming D (2010) Femoroacetabular impingement: screening and definitive imaging. Semin Roentgenol 45:228–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Beaulé PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K et al (2005) Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 23:1286–1292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hack K, DiPrimio G, Rakhra K, Beaulé PE (2010) Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2436–2444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ahn T, Kim CH, Kim TH et al (2016) What is the prevalence of radiographic hip findings associated with femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic Asian volunteers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:2655–2661PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Frank JM, Harris JD, Erickson BJ et al (2015) Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:1199–1204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Omoumi P, Thiery C, Michoux N et al (2014) Anatomic features associated with femoroacetabular impingement are equally common in hips of old and young asymptomatic individuals without CT signs of osteoarthritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:1078–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bixby SD, Kienle KP, Nasreddine A et al (2013) Reference values for proximal femoral anatomy in adolescents based on sex, physis, and imaging plane. Am J Sports Med 41:2074–2082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesaeter IO et al (2013) Is a positive femoroacetabular impingement test a common finding in healthy young adults? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2267–2277PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE et al (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:47–66PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nepple JJ, Wells J, Ross JR et al (2017) Three patterns of acetabular deficiency are common in young adult patients with acetabular dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1037–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wyatt M, Weidner J, Pfluger D, Beck M (2017) The femoro-acetabular roof (FEAR) index: a new measurement associated with instability in borderline hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:861–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wong TY, Jesse MK, Jensen A et al (2018) Upsloping lateral sourcil: a radiographic finding of hip instability. J Hip Preserv Surg 5:435–442PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fredensdorg N (1976) The CE angle of normal hips. Acta Orthop Scand 47:403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Armbruster TG, Guerra J Jr, Resnick D et al (1978) The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part I: the bony landmarks. Radiology 128:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Werner CM, Ramseler LE, Ruckstuhl T et al (2012) Normal values of Wiberg’s lateral center-edge angle and Lequesne’s acetabular index — a coxometric update. Skelet Radiol 41:1273–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fischer CS, Kühn JP, Ittermann T et al (2018) What are the reference values and associated factors for center edge angle and alpha angle? A population-based study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:2249–2259PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Siebenrock KA, Kistler L, Schwab JM et al (2012) The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3355–3360PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Anderson LA, Anderson MB, Erickson JA et al (2017) Acetabular wall indices help to distinguish acetabular coverage in asymptomatic adults with varying morphologies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1027–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Garabekyan T, Ashwell Z, Chadayammuri V et al (2016) Lateral acetabular coverage predicts the size of the hip labrum. Am J Sports Med 44:1582–1589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kraeutler MJ, Goodrich JA, Ashwell ZR et al (2019) Combined lateral osteolabral coverage is normal in hips with acetabular dysplasia. Arthroscopy 35:800–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Babst D, Steppacher SD, Ganz R et al (2011) The iliocapsularis muscle: an important stabilizer in the dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1728–1734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kraeutler MJ, Garabekyan T, Pascual-Garrido C, Mei-Dan O (2016) Hip instability: a review of hip dysplasia and other contributing factors. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 6:343–353PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    d’Hemecourt PA, Sugimoto D, McKee-Proctor M et al (2018) Can dynamic ultrasonography of the hip reliably assess anterior femoral head translation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1086–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations