Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 122–127 | Cite as

Lower-extremity growth patterns and skeletal maturation in children with unilateral fibular hemimelia

  • Andy Tsai
  • Paul K. Kleinman
  • Tal Laor
  • James R. Kasser
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Fibular hemimelia is the most common congenital long-bone deficiency. It is usually unilateral and results in a limb-length discrepancy. The literature generally subscribes to the concept of constant inhibition, a process by which limb-length ratios between the shorter and longer extremity remain constant throughout growth, but scientific data supporting this concept are sparse. Additionally, recent literature suggests that these children have abnormal skeletal maturation.

Objective

To elucidate the lower-extremity long-bone growth patterns and skeletal maturation of children with unilateral fibular hemimelia.

Materials and methods

We reviewed medical records of children with unilateral fibular hemimelia seen at a large pediatric hospital over a 17-year period. Inclusion criteria were: at least two scanograms prior to any shortening/lengthening procedure, and no other congenital or acquired disorders. We collected the study cohort’s femoral and tibial lengths (scanogram reports), plotted them against patient chronological ages and compared them to published growth standards. When these children’s bone ages (Greulich and Pyle) were available, we plotted them against the children’s chronological ages.

Results

Twenty-three children were included (total=115 scanograms). At least 1 bone-age assessment was performed in 19 children (total=84 bone ages). All bone growth curves were within normal growth standards for the femur and tibia. Length ratios between shorter and longer limbs remained constant. Skeletal maturation was within two standard deviations of normal in 90% of bone ages.

Conclusion

Lower-extremity long bones of children with unilateral fibular hemimelia have relatively normal growth curves, supporting and confirming the concept of constant inhibition. Most children show normal skeletal maturation.

Keywords

Children Constant inhibition Fibular hemimelia Long-bone growth Radiography Scanogram Skeletal maturation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Rogala EJ, Wynne-Davis R, Littlejohn A, Gormley J (1974) Congenital limb anomalies: frequency and aetiological factors. Data from the Edinburgh register of the newborn (1964–68). J Med Genet 11:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boakes JL, Stevens PM, Moseley RF (1991) Treatment of genu valgus deformity in congenital absence of the fibula. J Pediatr Orthop 11:721–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Froster UG, Baird PA (1993) Congenital defects of lower limbs and associated malformations: a population based study. Am J Med Genet 45:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ollerenshaw R (1925) Congenital defects of the long bones of the lower limb. A contribution to the study of their causes, effects, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 7:528–552Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crawford DA, Tompkins BJ, Baird GO, Caskey PM (2012) The long-term function of the knee in patients with fibular hemimelia and anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fordham LA, Applegate KE, Wilkes DC, Chung CJ (1999) Fibular hemimelia: more than just an absent bone. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 3:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birch JG, Lincoln TL, Mack PW, Birch CM (2011) Congenital fibular deficiency: a review of thirty years’ experience at one institution and a proposed classification system based on clinical deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1144–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Achterman C, Kalamchi A (1979) Congenital deficiency of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61-B:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hootnick D, Boyd NA, Fixsen JA, Lloyd-Roberts GC (1977) The natural history and management of congenital short tibia with dysplasia or absence of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szoke G, Mackenzie WG, Domos G et al (2011) Possible mistakes in prediction of bone maturation in fibular hemimelia by Moseley chart. Int Orthop 35:755–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breen MA, Tsai A, Stamm A, Kleinman PK (2016) Bone age assessment practices in infants and older children among Society for Pediatric Radiology members. Pediatr Radiol 46:1269–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson M, Messner MB, Green WT (1964) Distribution of lengths of the normal femur and tibia in children from one to eighteen years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1197–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moseley CF (1978) A straight line graph for leg length discrepancies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 136:33–40Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shapiro F (1982) Developmental patterns in lower-extremity length discrepancies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:639–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of OrthopedicsBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations