Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 48, Issue 13, pp 1915–1923 | Cite as

Parasagittal vertex clots on head CT in infants with subdural hemorrhage as a predictor for abusive head trauma

  • Meghann M. RonningEmail author
  • Patrick L. Carolan
  • Gretchen J. Cutler
  • Richard J. Patterson
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Abusive head trauma (AHT) is the most common cause of subdural hemorrhage (SDH) in infants younger than 12 months old. Clot formation in the parasagittal vertex seen on imaging has been associated with SDH due to AHT. There have been very few studies regarding these findings; to our knowledge, no studies including controls have been performed.

Objective

To describe parasagittal vertex clots on head computed tomography (CT) in infants with SDH and AHT compared to patients with SDH and accidental trauma, and to evaluate for parasagittal vertex clots in the absence of SDH in the setting of known accidental head trauma.

Materials and methods

All infants younger than 12 months old with SDH present on CT scan were retrospectively identified from 2004 to 2014. Blinded, independent review of all CT scans for clot formation at the parasagittal vertex was performed by a pediatric neuroradiologist.

Results

Ninety-nine patients were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 4 months. Fifty-seven (57.6%) were male. Fifty-five (55.6%) patients were identified as having AHT and 22 (22.2%) had accidental trauma. Forty-five (81.2%) patients with AHT had parasagittal vertex clots present on CT scan compared to 8 (36.4%) patients with accidental trauma. Compared to patients without parasagittal vertex clots, those with parasagittal vertex clots were more likely to have AHT (66.2% vs. 32.3%, P=0.001), no known mechanism of injury (69.1% vs. 32.3%, P=0.015), retinal hemorrhage (75% vs. 35.5%, P=0.002) and hypoxic-ischemic changes (25% vs. 0%, P=0.002). Patients with parasagittal vertex clots have eight times the odds of AHT compared to patients without parasagittal vertex clots. Age-matched control patients who underwent head CT scan due to a history of accidental head injury without SDH were identified (n=87); no patient in the control group had parasagittal vertex clots.

Conclusion

The finding of parasagittal vertex clots on CT scans should raise suspicion for abuse and prompt further investigation, especially in the setting of no known, uncertain or inconsistent mechanism of injury.

Keywords

Abusive head trauma Child abuse Computed tomography Infants Parasagittal vertex clots Subdural hemorrhage 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Klevens J, Leeb RT (2010) Child maltreatment fatalities in children under 5: findings from the national violence death reporting system. Child Abuse Negl 34:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duhaime AC, Christian CW, Rorke LB, Zimmerman RA (1998) Nonaccidental head injury in infants--the "shaken-baby syndrome". N Engl J Med 338:1822–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matschke J, Voss J, Obi N et al (2009) Nonaccidental head injury is the most common cause of subdural bleeding in infants <1 year of age. Pediatrics 124:1587–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW et al (2003) A population-based study of inflicted traumatic brain injury in young children. JAMA 290:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Academy of Pediatrics: Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect (2001) Shaken baby syndrome: rotational cranial injury technical report. Pediatrics 108:206–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shanahan ME, Zolotor AJ, Parrish JW et al (2013) National, regional, and state abusive head trauma: application of the CDC algorithm. Pediatrics 132:2013–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maguire S, Pickerd N, Farewell D et al (2009) Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 94:860–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rooks VJ, Eaton JP, Ruess L et al (2008) Prevalence and evolution of intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic term infants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:1082–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    King JW, Mackay M, Simick A (2003) Shaken baby syndrome in Canada: clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospital cases. CMAJ 168:155–159PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Case ME (2008) Inflicted traumatic brain injury in infants and young children. Brain Pathol 18:571–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamashima T, Friede RL (1984) Why do bridging veins rupture into the virtual subdural space? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tung GA, Kumar M, Richardson RC et al (2006) Comparison of accidental and nonaccidental traumatic head injury in children on noncontrast computed tomography. Pediatrics 118:626–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ et al (1992) Head injury in very young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics 90:179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rambaud C (2015) Bridging veins and autopsy findings in abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 45:1126–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yilmaz U, Korner H, Meyer S, Reith W (2014) Multifocal signal loss at bridging veins on susceptability-weighted imaging in abusive head trauma. Clin Neuroradiol 25:181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adamsbaum C, Rambaud C (2012) Abusive head trauma: don’t overlook bridging vein thrombosis. Pediatr Radiol 42:1298–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hahnemann ML, Kinner S, Schweiger B et al (2015) Imaging of bridging vein throbosis in infants with abusive head truma: the "tadpole sign.". Eur Radiol 25:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Choudhary AK, Bradford R, Dias MS et al (2015) Venous injury in abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 44:1803–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kemp AM, Jaspan T, Griffiths J et al (2011) Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 96:1103–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christian CW, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics (2015) The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics 135:1337–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maxeiner H (2001) Demonstration and interpretation of bridging vein ruptures in cases of infantile subdural bleedings. J Forensic Sci 46:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stein KM, Ruf K, Ganten MK, Mattern R (2006) Representation of cerebral bridging veins in infants by postmortem computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int 163:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maxeiner H (2001) Evaluation of subdural hemorrhage in infants after alleged minor trauma. Unfallchirurg 104:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hong HS, Lee JY (2018) Intracranial hemorrhage in term neonates. Childs Nerv Syst 34:1135–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Emergency MedicineChildren’s Hospital and Clinics of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Center for Acute Care OutcomesChildren’s Hospital and Clinics of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyChildren’s Hospital and Clinics of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations