Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 47, Issue 11, pp 1452–1462 | Cite as

Myocardial delayed-enhancement CT: initial experience in children and young adults

  • Hyun Woo GooEmail author
Original Article



Clinical utility of myocardial delayed enhancement CT has not been reported in children and young adults.


To describe initial experience of myocardial delayed enhancement CT regarding image quality, radiation dose and identification of myocardial lesions in children and young adults.

Materials and methods

Between August 2013 and November 2016, 29 consecutive children and young adults (median age 16 months) with suspected coronary artery or myocardial abnormality underwent arterial- and delayed-phase cardiac CT at our institution. We measured CT densities in normal myocardium, left ventricular cavity, and arterial and delayed hypo-enhancing and delayed hyperenhancing myocardial lesions. We then compared the extent of delayed hyperenhancing lesions with delayed-enhancement MRI or thallium single-photon emission CT.


Normal myocardium and left ventricular cavity showed significantly higher CT numbers on arterial-phase CT than on delayed-phase CT (t-test, P<0.0001). Contrast-to-noise ratios of the arterial and delayed hypo-enhancing and delayed hyperenhancing lesions on CT were 26.7, 17.6 and 18.7, respectively. Delayed-phase CT findings were equivalent to those of delayed-enhancement MRI in all cases (7/7) and to those of thallium single-photon emission CT in 70% (7/10).


Myocardial delayed-enhancement CT can be added to evaluate myocardial lesions in select children and young adults with suspected coronary artery or myocardial abnormality.


Computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging Children Myocardial delayed enhancement Thallium single-photon emission computed tomography Heart 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Higgins CB, Sovak M, Schmidt W et al (1979) Differential accumulation of radiopaque contrast material in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 43:47–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abraham JL, Higgins CB, Newell JD (1980) Uptake of iodinated contrast material in ischemic myocardium as an indicator of loss of cellular membrane integrity. Am J Pathol 101:319–330PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Higgins CB, Siemers PT, Newell JD et al (1980) Role of iodinated contrast material in the evaluation of myocardial infarction by computerized transmission tomography. Investig Radiol 15:S176–S182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacquier A, Revel D, Saeed M (2008) MDCT of the myocardium: a new contribution to ischemic heart disease. Acad Radiol 15:477–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koyama Y, Matsuoka H, Mochizuki T et al (2005) Assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction with two-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT: prediction of left ventricular function and wall thickness. Radiology 235:804–811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M et al (2008) Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 247:49–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao L, Ma X, Feuchtner GM et al (2014) Quantification of myocardial delayed enhancement and wall thickness in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 83:1778–1785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esposito A, Palmisano A, Antunes S et al (2016) Cardiac CT with delayed enhancement in the characterization of ventricular tachycardia structural substrate: relationship between CT-segmented scar and electro-anatomic mapping. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:822–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Hamaekers P et al (2005) MR coronary angiography and late-enhancement myocardial MR in children who underwent arterial switch surgery for transposition of great arteries. Radiology 234:542–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Etesami M, Gilkeson RC, Rajiah P (2016) Utility of late gadolinium enhancement in pediatric cardiac MRI. Pediatr Radiol 46:1096–1113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goo HW (2011) Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 41:839–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goo HW, Suh DS (2006) The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 36:833–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Israel GM, Herlihy S, Rubinowitz AN et al (2008) Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality? AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:140–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mendoza DD, Joshi SB, Weissman G et al (2010) Viability imaging by cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4:83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goo HW (2012) CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 13:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging Committee of the Council on clinical cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang R, Zhang Z, Xu L et al (2011) Low dose prospective ECG-gated delayed enhanced dual-source computed tomography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol 80:326–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goetti R, Feuchtner G, Stolzmann P et al (2011) Delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI. Eur Radiol 21:2091–2099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Muhlenbruch G et al (2007) Low tube voltage improves computed tomography imaging of delayed myocardial contrast enhancement in an experimental acute myocardial infarction model. Investig Radiol 42:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paul JF, Wartski M, Caussin C et al (2005) Late defect on delayed contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. Radiology 236:485–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nikolaou K, Knez A, Sagmeister S et al (2004) Assessment of myocardial infarctions using multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:286–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koyama Y, Mochizuki T, Higaki J (2004) Computed tomography assessment of myocardial perfusion, viability, and function. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:800–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Friman O et al (2010) The culprit lesion and its consequences: combined visualization of the coronary arteries and delayed myocardial enhancement in dual-source CT: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 20:2834–2843CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chang HJ, George RT, Schuleri KH et al (2009) Prospective electrocardiogram-gated delayed enhanced multidetector computed tomography accurately quantifies infarct size and reduces radiation exposure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:412–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 113:394–404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goo HW (2015) Coronary artery imaging in children. Korean J Radiol 16:239–250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goo HW (2013) Current trends in cardiac CT in children. Acta Radiol 54:1055–1062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goo HW, Yang DH (2010) Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronized spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 40:1670–1680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goo HW, Seo DM, Yun TJ et al (2009) Coronary artery anomalies and clinically important anatomy in patients with congenital heart disease: multi-slice CT findings. Pediatr Radiol 39:265–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim HJ, Goo HW, Park S et al (2013) Left ventricle volume measured by cardiac CT in an infant with a small left ventricle: a new and accurate method in determining uni- or biventricular repair. Pediatr Radiol 43:243–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goo HW, Park SH (2015) Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:223–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations