Subjective and objective image differences in pediatric computed tomography cardiac angiography using lower iodine concentration
- 237 Downloads
Several recent studies showed the optimal contrast enhancement with a low-concentration and iso-osmolar contrast media in both adult and pediatric patients. However, low contrast media concentrations are not routinely used due to concerns of suboptimal enhancement of cardiac structures and small vessels.
To evaluate the feasibility of using iso-osmolar contrast media containing a low iodine dose for CT cardiac angiography at 80 kilovolts (kVp) in neonates and infants.
Materials and methods
The iodixanol 270 group consisted of 79 CT scans and the iopromide 370 group of 62 CT scans in patients ≤1 year old. Objective measurement of the contrast enhancement was analyzed and contrast-to-noise ratios of the ascending aorta and left ventricle were calculated. Regarding subjective measurement, a four-point scale system was devised to evaluate degrees of contrast enhancement, image noise, motion artifact and overall image quality of each image set. Reader performance for correctly differentiating iodixanol 270 and iopromide 370 by visual assessment was evaluated.
Group objective and subjective measurements were nonsignificantly different. Overall sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for correctly differentiating iodixanol 270 and iopromide 370 by visual assessment were 42.8%, 59%, and 50%, respectively.
The application of iodixanol 270 achieved optimal enhancement for performing pediatric cardiac CT angiography at 80 kVp in neonates and infants. Objective measurements of contrast enhancement and subjective image quality assessments were not statistically different in the iodixanol 270 and iopromide 370 groups.
KeywordsComputed tomography cardiac angiography Heart Infant Iodixanol Iopromide Multidetector computed tomography Newborn Radiographic contrast media
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
- 1.American College of Radiology (2015) ACR manual on contrast media, Version 10.1Google Scholar
- 5.Coley BD (2013) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging. Elsevier Health Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mahesh M (2009) MDCT physics: the basics: technology, image quality and radiation dose. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 30.Jo SH, Youn TJ, Koo BK et al (2006) Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:924–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar