Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is among the most common procedures performed in children in the hospital setting. PICC insertion can be simplified with the use of a sheathed needle as an alternative to the modified Seldinger technique.
To retrospectively evaluate PICC placement for the technique used and the incidence of complications at a large pediatric tertiary care center.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed all PICC placements at a single institution over a 4-year period. We reviewed patient records for demographic data, PICC placement technique, catheter size and number of lumens, and the incidence of complications (i.e. multiple attempted puncture sites, phlebitis and vessel thrombosis). We analyzed complication rates between two placement techniques using a chi-square test.
We identified 8,816 successful PICC placements, 4,749 (53.9%) in males and 4,067 (46.1%) in females. The average age of the patients for which a line was placed was 5.6 years (range 1 day to 45 years). A direct sheathed needle puncture technique was used in 8,362 (94.9%) placements and a modified Seldinger technique was used in 454 (5.1%). Complications occurred in 312 (3.7%) of direct sheathed needle puncture placements versus 17 (3.7%) of modified Seldinger placements (P = 0.99). Multiple puncture sites were required in 175 (2.1%) attempted direct sheathed needle puncture placements compared with 8 (1.7%) attempted modified Seldinger placements (P = 0.63). Phlebitis occurred in 94 (1.1%) direct sheathed needle puncture lines versus 5 (1.1%) modified Seldinger placed lines (P = 0.96). Vessel thrombosis occurred in 43 (0.5%) direct sheathed needle puncture lines versus 4 (0.9%) modified Seldinger placed lines (P = 0.30).
The direct peel-away sheathed needle vessel puncture technique and the modified Seldinger technique used to place PICC lines in children have similar complication rates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Chait P, Ingram J, Phillips-Cook C et al (1995) Peripherally inserted central catheters in children. Radiology 197:775–778
Westergaard B, Classen V, Walther-Larsen S (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheters in infants and children: indications, techniques, complications and clinical recommendations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57:278–287
Bourgeois FC, Lamagna P, Chiang VW (2011) Peripherally inserted central catheters. Pediatr Emerg Care 27:556–563
Chait PG, Temple M, Connolly B et al (2002) Pediatric interventional venous access. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:95–102
de Carvalho Onofre PS, da Luz Goncalves Pedreira M, Peterlini MA (2012) Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in children guided by ultrasound: a prospective randomized, and controlled trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:e282–e287
Yang RY, Moineddin R, Filipescu D et al (2012) Increased complexity and complications associated with multiple peripherally inserted central catheter insertions in children: the tip of the iceberg. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:351–357
Hatakeyama N, Hori T, Yamamoto M et al (2011) An evaluation of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for children with cancer requiring long-term venous access. Int J Hematol 94:372–377
Frey AM (1995) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheter program report: a summary of 4,536 catheter-days. J Intraven Nurs 18:280–291
Dubois J, Rypens F, Garel L et al (2007) Incidence of deep vein thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters in children and adolescents. CMAJ 177:1185–1190
Van Winkle P, Whiffen T, Liu IL (2008) Experience using peripherally inserted central venous catheters for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in children at a community hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J 27:1069–1072
Abedin S, Kapoor G (2008) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are a good option for prolonged venous access in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:251–255
Jumani K, Advani S, Reich NG et al (2013) Risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter complications in children. JAMA Pediatr 167:429–435
Racadio JM, Doellman DA, Johnson ND et al (2001) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complication rates related to catheter tip location. Pediatrics 107, E28
Conflicts of interest
About this article
Cite this article
Dasgupta, N., Patel, M.N., Racadio, J.M. et al. Comparison of complications between pediatric peripherally inserted central catheter placement techniques. Pediatr Radiol 46, 1439–1443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3629-4
- Interventional radiology
- Peripherally inserted central catheter
- Seldinger technique
- Sheathed needle vessel puncture