Pediatric interventional radiology clinic – how are we doing?
- 316 Downloads
Development of a pediatric interventional radiology clinic is a necessary component of providing a pediatric interventional radiology service. Patient satisfaction is important when providing efficient, high-quality care.
To analyze the care provided by a pediatric interventional radiology clinic from the perspective of efficiency and parent satisfaction, so as to identify areas for improvement.
Materials and methods
The prospective study was both quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative component measured clinic efficiency (waiting times, duration of clinic visit, nurse/physician time allocation and assessments performed; n = 91). The qualitative component assessed parental satisfaction with their experience with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic, using a questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and optional free text section for feedback (n = 80). Questions explored the family’s perception of relevance of information provided, consent process and overall satisfaction with their pediatric interventional radiology clinic experience.
Families waited a mean of 11 and 10 min to meet the physician and nurse, respectively. Nurses and physicians spent a mean of 28 and 21 min with the families, respectively. The average duration of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic consultation was 56 min. Of 80 survey participants, 83% were satisfied with their experience and 94% said they believed providing consent before the day of the procedure was helpful. Only 5% of respondents were not satisfied with the time-efficiency of the interventional radiology clinic.
Results show the majority of patients/parents are very satisfied with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic visit. The efficiency of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic is satisfactory; however, adherence to stricter scheduling can be improved.
KeywordsChildren Clinic Interventional radiology Pediatric Satisfaction Survey
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
- 1.(2014) ACR–SIR–SPR Practice parameter for interventional clinical practice and management. ACT Res 118. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACT/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Interventional_Clinical_Practice.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2016
- 15.Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55Google Scholar
- 19.Boughner R (2010) Volunteer bias. In: Salkind N (ed) Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 1609–1611Google Scholar