Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 45, Supplement 3, pp 370–374 | Cite as

Update on radiation safety and dose reduction in pediatric neuroradiology

  • Mahadevappa MaheshEmail author
Advances in Pediatric Neuroradiology


The number of medical X-ray imaging procedures is growing exponentially across the globe. Even though the overall benefit from medical X-ray imaging procedures far outweighs any associated risks, it is crucial to take all necessary steps to minimize radiation risks to children without jeopardizing image quality. Among the X-ray imaging studies, except for interventional fluoroscopy procedures, CT studies constitute higher dose and therefore draw considerable scrutiny. A number of technological advances have provided ways for better and safer CT imaging. This article provides an update on the radiation safety of patients and staff and discusses dose optimization in medical X-ray imaging within pediatric neuroradiology.


Children Computed tomography Radiation dose Radiation protection Radiation safety 


Conflicts of interest

The author has no financial interests, investigational or off-label uses to disclose.


  1. 1.
    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, NCRP report No. 160. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII, Phase 2. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2007) The 2007 recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP report No. 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahesh M (2009) MDCT physics: the basics — technology, image quality and radiation dose. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayo-Smith WW, Hara AK, Mahesh M et al (2014) How I do it: managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology 273:657–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shields E, Bushong SC (2013) Beware the mask. J Am Coll Radiol 10:149–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Connor SD, Sodickson AD, Ip IK et al (2014) Requiring clinical justification to override repeat imaging decision support: impact on CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:W482–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu L, Bruesewitz MR, Thomas KB et al (2011) Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics 31:835–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kroft LJM, Roelofs JJH, Geleijns J (2010) Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16-detector row CT acquisition. Pediatr Radiol 40:294–300PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:117–121Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khawaja RD, Singh S, Otrakji A et al (2014) Dose reduction in pediatric abdominal CT: use of iterative reconstruction techniques across different CT platforms. Pediatr RadiolGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu L, Leng S, McCollough CH (2012) Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:S9–S15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pindrik J, Huisman TA, Mahesh M et al (2013) Analysis of limited-sequence head computed tomography for children with shunted hydrocephalus: potential to reduce diagnostic radiation exposure. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:491–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niederhauser BD, McDonald RJ, Eckel LJ et al (2013) Retrospective review of rapid pediatric brain MR imaging at an academic institution including practice trends and factors affecting scan times. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1836–1840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2008) The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT, task group report 96. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Accessed 21 Feb 2015
  21. 21.
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2014) CT scan protocols. Accessed 20 Dec 2014
  22. 22.
    Mahesh M (2001) Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics 21:1003–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2010) Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically guided interventional medical procedures, NCRP report No. 168. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations