Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 45, Issue 9, pp 1355–1362 | Cite as

MRI as a reliable and accurate method for assessment of posterior hip dislocation in children and adolescents without the risk of radiation exposure

  • Stephanie W. Mayer
  • Jaime R. Stewart
  • Michael F. Fadell
  • Lauryn Kestel
  • Eduardo N. NovaisEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Posterior hip dislocation in children and adolescents may involve the non-ossified posterior acetabular wall. Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) have been shown to underestimate injury to the unossified acetabulum as well as associated soft-tissue structures.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to describe findings on radiographs, CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after posterior hip dislocation in a series of adolescents and to report the intraoperative findings, which are considered the gold standard. Measurements of the posterior wall length using MRI and CT scans were also performed.

Material and methods

After institutional review board approval, 40 patients who sustained a traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip between September 2007 and April 2014 were identified. Inclusion criteria were (1) age younger than 16 years old and (2) availability of MRI obtained following closed reduction of the hip. Eight male patients and one female patient with an average age of 13.2 years (range: 10.1-16.2 years) underwent hip MRI following posterior dislocation. Seven of the nine patients also underwent evaluation by CT. Plain radiographs, CT scans and MRI were evaluated in all patients by a single pediatric radiologist blinded to surgical findings for joint space asymmetry, posterior wall fracture, femoral head fracture, labrum tear, complete or partial ligamentum teres rupture and presence of intra-articular fragments. Six patients underwent surgical treatment and the intraoperative findings were compared with the imaging findings.

Results

CT identified all bone injuries but underestimated the involvement of posterior wall fractures. Assessment of the posterior wall size and fracture displacement was possible with MRI. All surgically confirmed soft-tissue injuries, including avulsion of the posterior labrum, were identified preoperatively on MRI. The measurement of posterior wall length was not statistically different using CT and MRI.

Conclusion

Intraoperative pathological findings at the time of open surgical treatment were universally recognized on MRI but not on CT scans. MRI should be considered for evaluation of the hip following closed reduction for the treatment of a posterior dislocation in children and adolescents as it reliably allows assessment of intra-articular pathology without the risk of radiation exposure.

Keywords

Acetabular fracture Children Computed tomography Hip Labrum Posterior hip dislocation Magnetic resonance imaging 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson VP, Epstein HC (1951) Traumatic dislocation of the hip; a survey of two hundred and four cases covering a period of twenty-one years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 33-A:746–778, passimPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vialle R, Odent T, Pannier S et al (2005) Traumatic hip dislocation in childhood. J Pediatr Orthop 25:138–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chun KA, Morcuende J, El-Khoury GY (2004) Entrapment of the acetabular labrum following reduction of traumatic hip dislocation in a child. Skeletal Radiol 33:728–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manner HM, Mast NH, Ganz R et al (2012) Potential contribution of femoroacetabular impingement to recurrent traumatic hip dislocation. J Pediatr Orthop B 21:574–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nepple JJ, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC (2011) Treatment of posttraumatic labral interposition with surgical hip dislocation and labral repair. Iowa Orthop J 31:187–192PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Offierski CM (1981) Traumatic dislocation of the hip in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 63-B:194–197Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shea KP, Kalamchi A, Thompson GH (1986) Acetabular epiphysis-labrum entrapment following traumatic anterior dislocation of the hip in children. J Pediatr Orthop 6:215–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vialle R, Pannier S, Odent T et al (2004) Imaging of traumatic dislocation of the hip in childhood. Pediatr Radiol 34:970–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elder G, Harvey EJ (2004) Surgical images: musculoskeletal. Imaging in musculoskeletal trauma: the value of magnetic resonance imaging for traumatic pediatric hip dislocations. Can J Surg 47:290–291PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fabricant PD, Hirsch BP, Holmes I et al (2013) A radiographic study of the ossification of the posterior wall of the acetabulum: implications for the diagnosis of pediatric and adolescent hip disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:230–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hearty T, Swaroop VT, Gourineni P et al (2011) Standard radiographs and computed tomographic scan underestimating pediatric acetabular fracture after traumatic hip dislocation: report of 2 cases. J Orthop Trauma 25:e68–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rubel IF, Kloen P, Potter HG et al (2002) MRI assessment of the posterior acetabular wall fracture in traumatic dislocation of the hip in children. Pediatr Radiol 32:435–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E et al (2001) Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 83:1119–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    AAPM (2008) American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Report 96: The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_96.pdf. Assessed Jan 2015
  15. 15.
    AAPM (2011) American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204: Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations (2011) American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_204.pdf. Accessed 06 Feb 2015
  16. 16.
    Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA et al (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1276–1284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calkins MS, Zych G, Latta L et al (1988) Computed tomography evaluation of stability in posterior fracture dislocation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:152–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keith JE Jr, Brashear HR Jr, Guilford WB (1988) Stability of posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip quantitative assessment using computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:711–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moed BR, Ajibade DA, Israel H (2009) Computed tomography as a predictor of hip stability status in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma 23:7–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vailas JC, Hurwitz S, Wiesel SW (1989) Posterior acetabular fracture-dislocations: fragment size, joint capsule, and stability. J Trauma 29:1494–1496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moed BR, Carr SE, Gruson KI et al (2003) Computed tomographic assessment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum after operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:512–522PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie W. Mayer
    • 1
  • Jaime R. Stewart
    • 2
  • Michael F. Fadell
    • 2
  • Lauryn Kestel
    • 1
  • Eduardo N. Novais
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryChildren’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyChildren’s Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations