Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 45, Issue 7, pp 1072–1076 | Cite as

CT of the chest in suspected child abuse using submillisievert radiation dose

  • Thomas R. Sanchez
  • Justin S. Lee
  • Kevin P. Coulter
  • J. Anthony Seibert
  • Rebecca Stein-Wexler
Technical Innovation

Abstract

The cornerstone of child abuse imaging is the skeletal survey, but initial imaging with radiographs may not demonstrate acute and non-displaced fractures, especially those involving the ribs. Given the high mortality of undiagnosed non-accidental trauma, timely diagnosis is crucial. CT is more sensitive in assessing rib fractures; however the effective radiation dose of a standard chest CT is high. We retrospectively identified four children (three boys, one girl; age range 1–4 months) admitted between January 2013 and February 2014 with high suspicion for non-accidental trauma from unexplained fractures of the long bones; these children all had CT of the chest when no rib fractures were evident on the skeletal survey. The absorbed radiation dose estimates for organs and tissue from the four-view chest radiographs and subsequent CT were determined using Monte Carlo photon transport software, and the effective dose was calculated using published tissue-weighting factors. In two children, CT showed multiple fractures of the ribs, scapula and vertebral body that were not evident on the initial skeletal survey. The average effective dose for a four-view chest radiograph across the four children was 0.29 mSv and the average effective dose for the chest CT was 0.56 mSv. Therefore the effective dose of a chest CT is on average less than twice that of a four-view chest radiograph. Our protocol thus shows that a reduced-dose chest CT may be useful in the evaluation of high specificity fractures of non-accidental trauma when the four-view chest radiographs are negative.

Keywords

Child abuse Non-accidental trauma Rib fractures Computed tomography Chest Ribs Infants 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology (2011) ACR-SPR practice guideline for skeletal surveys in children. American College of Radiology, Reston, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wootton-Gorges S, Stein-Wexler R, Walton J et al (2008) Comparison of computed tomography and chest radiography in the detection of rib fractures in abused infants. Child Abuse Negl 32:659–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barsness K, Cha E, Bensard D et al (2003) The positive predictive value of rib fractures as an indicator of nonaccidental trauma in children. J Trauma 54:1107–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neroladaki A, Diomidis B, Boudabbous S et al (2012) Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 23:360–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    (2007) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Protection, ICRP Publication 103. Ann IRCP 37:1–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas R. Sanchez
    • 1
  • Justin S. Lee
    • 2
  • Kevin P. Coulter
    • 3
  • J. Anthony Seibert
    • 1
  • Rebecca Stein-Wexler
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Pediatric Radiology, University of California-DavisMedical Center Children’s HospitalSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of California-DavisSacramentoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Pediatrics, University of California-DavisMedical Center Children’s HospitalSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations