Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 10, pp 1224–1229 | Cite as

Healing patterns of clavicular birth injuries as a guide to fracture dating in cases of possible infant abuse

  • Michele M. Walters
  • Peter W. Forbes
  • Carlo Buonomo
  • Paul K. Kleinman
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Dating fractures is critical in cases of suspected infant abuse. There are little scientific data to guide radiologists, and dating is generally based on personal experience and conventional wisdom.

Objective

Since birth-related clavicular fractures are not immobilized and their age is known, we propose that an assessment of these injuries may serve as a guide for dating inflicted fractures in young infants, acknowledging that patterns observed in the clavicle may not be entirely generalizable to other bones injured in the setting of abuse.

Materials and methods

One hundred thirty-one radiographs of presumed birth-related clavicular fractures in infants between 0 and 3 months of age were reviewed by two pediatric radiologists with 30 and 15 years’ experience. Readers were asked to evaluate images based on several parameters of fracture healing, with a focus on subperiosteal new bone formation (SPNBF) and callus formation. SPNBF and callus were each evaluated with regard to presence, thickness and character. Responses were correlated with known fracture ages.

Results

SPNBF was rarely seen in fractures less than 7 days old and was most often present by 10 days. Callus formation was rarely seen in fractures less than 9 days old and was most often present by 15 days. SPNBF thickness increased with fracture age and the character of SPNBF evolved from single-layered to solid/multilayered. Callus thickness decreased with fracture age and callus matrix evolved from soft to intermediate to hard in character.

Conclusion

There is an evolution in clavicular fracture healing in young infants that follows a predictable pattern. These findings afford the prospect that predictable patterns of infant clavicular fracture healing can provide an evidence base that may be applicable in cases of suspected infant abuse.

Keywords

Radiography Fracture dating Fracture healing Child abuse Non-accidental trauma Neonate Clavicle 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    O’Connor JF, Cohen J (1998) Dating fractures. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 2nd edn. Mosby Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, pp 168–177Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kleinman PK, Blackbourne BD, Marks SC et al (1989) Radiologic contributions to the investigation and prosecution of cases of fatal infant abuse. N Engl J Med 320:507–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chapman S (1992) The radiological dating of injuries. Arch Dis Child 67:1063–1065PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ et al (1992) Head injury in very young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics 90:179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS et al (1993) Fractures in young children. distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child 147:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strouse PJ, Boal DKB (2013) Child abuse. In: Coley BD (ed) Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, 12th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1587–1598Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ebbin AJ, Gollub MH, Stein AM et al (1969) Battered child syndrome at the Los Angeles County general hospital. Am J Dis Child 118:660–667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akbarnia B, Torg JS, Kirkpatrick J et al (1974) Manifestations of the battered-child syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1159–1166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herndon WA (1983) Child abuse in a military population. J Pediatr Orthop 3:73–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Worlock P, Stower M, Barbor P (1986) Patterns of fractures in accidental and non-accidental injury in children: a comparative study. Br Med J 293:100–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yeo LI, Reed MH (1994) Staging of healing of femoral fractures in children. Can Assoc Radiol J 45:16–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S et al (2000) Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:75–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prosser I, Lawson Z, Evans A et al (2012) A timetable for the radiologic features of fracture healing in young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1014–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Halliday KE, Broderick NJ, Somers JM et al (2011) Dating fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 66:1049–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malone CA, Sauer NJ, Fenton TW (2011) A radiographic assessment of pediatric fracture healing and time since injury. J Forensic Sci 56:1123–1130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kleinman PK (1998) Skeletal trauma: general considerations. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 2nd edn. Mosby Year Book, Inc, St. Louis, pp 8–25Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogden JA (2000) Biology of repair of the immature skeleton. In: Ogden JA (ed) Skeletal injury in the child, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 243–268Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Child Maltreatment (2011). Children’s Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. Published 2011. Available at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm11.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2012.
  19. 19.
    Sarwark JF (2010) Proximal humerus, scapula, and clavicle. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR (eds) Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 625–626Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cumming WA (1979) Neonatal skeletal fractures. birth trauma or child abuse? Can Assoc Radiol J 30:30–33Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanchez TR, Nguyen H, Palacios W et al (2013) Retrospective evaluation and dating of non-accidental rib fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 68:467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ACR-SPR (1997) Practice guideline for skeletal surveys in children. The American College of Radiology Published 1997. Revised 2011. Available at: http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Skeletal_Surveys.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele M. Walters
    • 1
  • Peter W. Forbes
    • 1
  • Carlo Buonomo
    • 1
  • Paul K. Kleinman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations