Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 738–746 | Cite as

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis of neonatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy

  • Keith A. CauleyEmail author
  • Christopher G. Filippi
Original Article



Diffusion-weighted imaging is a valuable tool in the assessment of the neonatal brain, and changes in diffusion are seen in normal development as well as in pathological states such as hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Various methods of quantitative assessment of diffusion values have been reported. Global ischemic injury occurring during the time of rapid developmental changes in brain myelination can complicate the imaging diagnosis of neonatal HIE.


To compare a quantitative method of histographic analysis of brain apparent coefficient (ADC) maps to the qualitative interpretation of routine brain MR imaging studies. We correlate changes in diffusion values with gestational age in radiographically normal neonates, and we investigate the sensitivity of the method as a quantitative measure of hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy.

Materials and methods

We reviewed all brain MRI studies from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at our university medical center over a 4-year period to identify cases that were radiographically normal (23 cases) and those with diffuse, global hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (12 cases). We histographically displayed ADC values of a single brain slice at the level of the basal ganglia and correlated peak (s-sDav) and lowest histogram values (s-sDlowest) with gestational age.


Normative s-sDav values correlated significantly with gestational age and declined linearly through the neonatal period (r 2 = 0.477, P < 0.01). Six of 12 cases of known HIE demonstrated significantly lower s-sDav and s-sDlowest ADC values than were reflected in the normative distribution; several cases of HIE fell within a 95% confidence interval for normative studies, and one case demonstrated higher-than-normal s-sDav.


Single-slice histographic display of ADC values is a rapid and clinically feasible method of quantitative analysis of diffusion. In this study normative values derived from consecutive neonates without radiographic evidence of ischemic injury are correlated with gestational age, declining linearly throughout the perinatal period. This method does identify cases of HIE, though the overall sensitivity of the method is low.


Hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy Apparent diffusion coefficient maps Diffusion-weighted imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Brain development Neonates 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Barkovich AJ (2005) Brain and spine injuries in infancy and childhood. Pediatric neuroimaging. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 190–290Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heinz ER, Provenzale JM (2009) Imaging findings in neonatal hypoxia: a practical review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:41–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rutherford M, Srinivasan L, Dyet L et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging in perinatal brain injury: clinical presentation, lesions and outcome. Pediatr Radiol 36:582–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alderliesten T, de Vries LS, Benders MJ et al (2011) MR imaging and outcome of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and (1)H MR spectroscopy. Radiology 261:235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barkovich AJ, Miller SP, Bartha A et al (2006) MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging of sequential studies in neonates with encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:533–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hunt RW, Neil JJ, Coleman LT et al (2004) Apparent diffusion coefficient in the posterior limb of the internal capsule predicts outcome after perinatal asphyxia. Pediatrics 114:999–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liauw L, van Wezel-Meijler G, Veen S et al (2009) Do apparent diffusion coefficient measurements predict outcome in children with neonatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:264–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okereafor A, Allsop J, Counsell SJ et al (2008) Patterns of brain injury in neonates exposed to perinatal sentinel events. Pediatrics 121:906–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chun T, Filippi CG, Zimmerman RD et al (2000) Diffusion changes in the aging human brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1078–1083PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rutherford M, Ramenghi LA, Edwards AD et al (2010) Assessment of brain tissue injury after moderate hypothermia in neonates with hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy: a nested substudy of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 9:39–45PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards AD et al (2009) Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 361:1349–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA et al (2005) Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 353:1574–1584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisher M, Bogousslavsky J (1993) Evolving toward effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA 270:360–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grotta J, Clark W, Coull B et al (1995) Safety and tolerability of the glutamate antagonist CGS 19755 (Selfotel) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Results of a phase IIa randomized trial. Stroke 26:602–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ulug AM (2002) Monitoring brain development with quantitative diffusion tensor imaging. Dev Sci 5:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang L, Thomas KM, Davidson MC et al (2005) MR quantitation of volume and diffusion changes in the developing brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:45–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lovblad KO, Schneider J, Ruoss K et al (2003) Isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of postnatal cerebral development. Neuroradiology 45:400–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Provenzale JM, Isaacson J, Chen S et al (2010) Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy values in the developing infant brain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:W456–W462PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neil JJ, Shiran SI, McKinstry RC et al (1998) Normal brain in human newborns: apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion anisotropy measured by using diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology 209:57–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McKinstry RC, Miller JH, Snyder AZ et al (2002) A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns. Neurology 59:824–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Toft PB, Leth H, Peitersen B et al (1996) The apparent diffusion coefficient of water in gray and white matter of the infant brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:1006–1011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyNew York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations