Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 542–551

Heterotaxy syndromes and abnormal bowel rotation

  • Beverley Newman
  • Raji Koppolu
  • Daniel Murphy
  • Karl Sylvester
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Bowel rotation abnormalities in heterotaxy are common. As more children survive cardiac surgery, the management of gastrointestinal abnormalities has become controversial.

Objective

To evaluate imaging of malrotation in heterotaxy with surgical correlation and provide an algorithm for management.

Materials and methods

Imaging reports of heterotaxic children with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) and/or small bowel follow-through (SBFT) were reviewed. Subsequently, fluoroscopic images were re-reviewed in conjunction with CT/MR studies. The original reports and re-reviewed images were compared and correlated with surgical findings.

Results

Nineteen of 34 children with heterotaxy underwent UGI, 13/19 also had SBFT. In 15/19 reports, bowel rotation was called abnormal: 11 malrotation, 4 non-rotation, no cases of volvulus. Re-review, including CT (10/19) and MR (2/19), designated 17/19 (90%) as abnormal, 10 malrotation (abnormal bowel arrangement, narrow or uncertain length of mesentery) and 7 non-rotation (small bowel and colon on opposite sides plus low cecum with probable broad mesentery). The most useful CT/MR findings were absence of retroperitoneal duodenum in most abnormal cases and location of bowel, especially cecum. Abnormal orientation of mesenteric vessels suggested malrotation but was not universal. Nine children had elective bowel surgery; non-rotation was found in 4/9 and malrotation was found in 5/9, with discrepancies (non-rotation at surgery, malrotation on imaging) with 4 original interpretations and 1 re-review.

Conclusion

We recommend routine, early UGI and SBFT studies once other, urgent clinical concerns have been stabilized, with elective laparoscopic surgery in abnormal or equivocal cases. Cross-sectional imaging, usually obtained for other reasons, can contribute diagnostically. Attempting to assess mesenteric width is important in differentiating non-rotation from malrotation and more accurately identifies appropriate surgical candidates.

Keywords

Heterotaxy Malrotation Non-rotation Children Computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging Upper gastrointestinal series 

References

  1. 1.
    Daneman A (2009) Malrotation: the balance of evidence. Pediatr Radiol 39:S164–S166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi M, Borenstein SH, Hornberger L et al (2005) Heterotaxia syndrome: the role of screening for intestinal rotation abnormalities. Arch Dis Child 90:813–815PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strouse PJ (2004) Disorders of intestinal rotation and fixation ("malrotation"). Pediatr Radiol 34:837–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor GA (2011) CT appearance of the duodenum and mesenteric vessels in children with normal and abnormal bowel rotation. Pediatr Radiol 41:1378–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yousefzadeh DK (2009) The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 39:S172–S177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tashjian DB, Weeks B, Brueckner M et al (2007) Outcomes after a Ladd procedure for intestinal malrotation with heterotaxia. J Pediatr Surg 42:528–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SE, Kim HY, Jung SE et al (2006) Situs anomalies and gastrointestinal abnormalities. J Pediatr Surg 41:1237–1242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papillon S, Goodhue CJ, Zmora O et al (2013) Congenital heart disease and heterotaxy: upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy can be misleading and surgery in an asymptomatic patient is not beneficial. J Pediatr Surg 48:164–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu DC, Thiagarajan RR, Laussen PC et al (2009) Outcomes after the Ladd procedure in patients with heterotaxy syndrome, congenital heart disease, and intestinal malrotation. J Pediatr Surg 44:1089–1095, discussion 1095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Watanabe T, Nakano M, Yamazawa K et al (2011) Neonatal intestinal volvulus and preduodenal portal vein associated with situs ambiguus: report of a case. Surg Today 41:726–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pockett CR, Dicken B, Rebeyka IM et al (2013) Heterotaxy syndrome: is a prophylactic Ladd procedure necessary in asymptomatic patients? Pediatr Cardiol 34:59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Applegate KE (2009) Evidence-based diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus. Pediatr Radiol 39:S161–S163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Long FR, Kramer SS, Markowitz RI et al (1996) Radiographic patterns of intestinal malrotation in children. Radiographics 16:547–556, discussion 556-560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karmazyn B (2013) Duodenum between the aorta and the SMA does not exclude malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 43:121–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beverley Newman
    • 1
  • Raji Koppolu
    • 2
  • Daniel Murphy
    • 3
  • Karl Sylvester
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyStanford University, Lucile Packard Children’s HospitalStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryLucile Packard Children’s Hospital at StanfordStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of CardiologyLucile Packard Children’s Hospital at StanfordStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations