Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT: a study of regional community adoption in the United States
During the last decade, there has been a movement in the United States toward utilizing size-appropriate radiation doses for pediatric body CT, with smaller doses given to smaller patients.
This study assesses community adoption of size-appropriate pediatric CT techniques. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric body scans are compared between community facilities and a university children’s hospital that tailors CT protocols to patient size as advocated by Image Gently.
Materials and methods
We compared 164 pediatric body scans done at community facilities (group X) with 466 children’s hospital scans. Children’s hospital scans were divided into two groups: A, 250 performed with established pediatric weight-based protocols and filtered back projection; B, 216 performed with addition of iterative reconstruction technique and a 60% reduction in volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). SSDE was calculated and differences among groups were compared by regression analysis.
Mean SSDE was 1.6 and 3.9 times higher in group X than in groups A and B and 2.5 times higher for group A than group B. A model adjusting for confounders confirmed significant differences between group pairs.
Regional community hospitals and imaging centers have not universally adopted child-sized pediatric CT practices. More education and accountability may be necessary to achieve widespread implementation. Since even lower radiation doses are possible with iterative reconstruction technique than with filtered back projection alone, further exploration of the former is encouraged.
KeywordsComputed tomography Radiation dose reduction Community hospitals Children’s hospitals Pediatrics
The authors thank David P. Hopkins, MD, MPH, for invaluable assistance with study design and manuscript review.
Conflict of interest
K.L.H. reports unrelated research funding from GE Medical Systems (1995) and Toshiba Medical Systems (1997), D.R.P. was a speaker from Philips Healthcare (2011), and D.M.E.B. is a consultant and member of the Speaker’s Bureau for Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV.
- 6.The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging (2008) Image Gently®. http://www.imagegently.org Accessed 26 August 2012
- 11.American College of Radiology (2012) CT accreditation program requirements. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Accreditation/CT Accessed 27 August 2012
- 12.Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV (2011) iDose4 iterative reconstruction technique: breakthrough in image quality and dose reduction with the 4th generation of reconstruction. http://www.healthcare.philips.com/pwc_hc/main/shared/Assets/Documents/ct/idose_white_paper_452296267841.pdf Accessed 3 January 2013
- 14.American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations (Report No. 204). American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College ParkGoogle Scholar
- 15.McCollough C, Branham T, Herlihy V et al (2011) Diagnostic reference levels from the ACR Accreditation Program. Am J Cancer Res 8:795–803Google Scholar
- 18.U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2012) Draft guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff—pediatric information for x-ray imaging device premarket notifications. Available via http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm300850.htm Accessed 10 May 2012