Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 8, pp 1037–1040 | Cite as

4-D MRI flow analysis in the course of interrupted aortic arch reveals complex morphology and quantifies amount of collateral blood flow

  • Daniel HirtlerEmail author
  • Julia Geiger
  • Bernd Jung
  • Michael Markl
  • Raoul Arnold
Case Report

Abstract

We present findings in a 17-year-old with interrupted aortic arch, in whom standard imaging techniques missed functional and morphological problems. Flow-sensitive four-dimensional magnetic resonance (4-D MR) enabled assessment of the complex anatomy and blood-flow characteristics in the entire aorta and direct quantification of blood flow in collateral vessels. Our findings highlight the entire morphological and functional problem of interrupted aortic arch and illustrate the potential of flow-sensitive 4-D MR for surgical planning in congenital heart disease.

Keywords

Interrupted aortic arch Flow-sensitive 4-D MR Collateral blood flow Congenital heart disease 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, grant No. 01EV0706.

Supplementary material

Supplemental movie 1

Flow-sensitive 4-D MRI shows 3-D blood flow dynamics of the whole aorta and the collateral vessels. Red shows blood flow to the ascending aorta and the supra-aortal vessels. Green shows collateral blood flow into the right mammarian artery. Light and dark blue: collateral flow in two major collateral vessels draining into the descending aorta. At the site of aortic arch interruption no blood flow is registered. (MPG 9786 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yu L, Shi E, Gu T (2011) Single-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch with simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in an adult. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1110–1113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sai Krishna C, Bhan A, Sharma S et al (2005) Interruption of aortic arch in adults: surgical experience with extra-anatomic bypass. Tex Heart Inst J 32:147–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Markl M, Harloff A, Bley TA et al (2007) Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3 T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:824–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riehle TJ, Oshinski JN, Brummer ME et al (2006) Velocity-encoded magnetic resonance image assessment of regional aortic flow in coarctation patients. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1002–1007Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pujadas S, Reddy GP, Weber O et al (2006) Phase contrast MR imaging to measure changes in collateral blood flow after stenting of recurrent aortic coarctation: initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:72–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A et al (2008) Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 60:1218–1231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nordmeyer S, Riesenkampff E, Crelier G et al (2010) Flow-sensitive four-dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: a validation study. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:677–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Hirtler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julia Geiger
    • 2
  • Bernd Jung
    • 2
  • Michael Markl
    • 3
  • Raoul Arnold
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart DiseaseUniversity Hospital FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Medical PhysicsUniversity Hospital FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  3. 3.Departments of Radiology and Biomedical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart DiseaseUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations