Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 43, Supplement 1, pp 83–89

Orthopedic perspectives on femoroacetabular impingement

Pediatric Musculoskeletal Imaging: Beyond the Basics

Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a cause of hip pain in which there is abnormal and repetitive contact between the proximal femur and the acetabulum. FAI can occur as a primary condition in children with distinct anatomical abnormalities or can occur as a secondary process in cases of developmental hip conditions or trauma. There are two main categories of FAI, cam and pincer, which are distinguished based on whether the anatomical abnormality is on the femoral side or the acetabular side of the hip joint, respectively. Good outcomes have been achieved with early surgical intervention, but once advanced degenerative changes have occurred the chances for a successful surgical outcome are severely diminished. The orthopedic surgeon’s ability to appropriately treat FAI depends on an accurate understanding of the etiology and features of each child. The ability to make an early, accurate diagnosis is enhanced with the use of imaging modalities such as radiographs, MRI and CT. This review will focus on orthopedic perspectives in the use of these imaging modalities in defining the anatomical features of and guiding treatment for FAI.

Keywords

Femoroacetabular impingement Cam Pincer Imaging modalities Children 

References

  1. 1.
    Bitton R (2009) The economic burden of osteoarthritis. Am J Manage Care 15(8Suppl):S230–S235Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aronson J (1986) Osteoarthritis of the young adult hip: etiology and treatment. Instr Course Lect 35:119–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement—a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M et al (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1012–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beck M, Leunig M, Parviri J et al (2004) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:67–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manaster BJ, Zakel S (2006) Imaging of femoral acetabular impingement syndrome. Clin Sports Med 25:635–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brian P, Bernard S, Flemming D (2010) Femoroacetabular impingement: screening and definitive imaging. Semin Roentgenol 45:228–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R (2003) Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:241–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS et al (2008) Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:677–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A et al (1996) Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology 200:225–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beall DP, Sweet CF, Martin HD et al (2005) Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 34:691–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stocklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bittersohl B, Hosalkar HS, Apprich S et al (2011) Comparison of pre-operative dGEMRIC imaging with intra-operative findings in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary findings. Skeletal Radiol 40:553–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K (1999) Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:281–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wassilew GI, Heller MO, Diedrichs G et al (2012) Standardized AP radiographs do not provide reliable diagnostic measures for the assessment of acetabular retroversion. Orthop Res 30:1369–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric OrthopaedicsTexas Children’s HospitalHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations