A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography
Little information exists concerning appropriate exposure and measuring overall patient dose in pediatric digital radiography.
To establish a convenient method of appropriate exposure from target exposure index (EI) and thickness in pediatric digital radiography and estimate patient entrance-surface dose (ESD) and dose-area product (DAP) associated with chest, abdomen and pelvis radiography.
Materials and methods
A formula was deduced to calculate appropriate mAs changed with children’s weight and height. EI was used to control image quality. With this formula, dose-optimized procedures were carried out. Data were collected from 180 pediatric examinations, including chest, abdomen and pelvis anterior-posterior (AP) projections. The children were divided into the following age bands: newborns (0–28 days), infants (28 days-2 years) and older children (2–7 years). In each age band, ten children were exposed with the calculated appropriate mAs and EI values were kept steady in appropriate range (referred as target group) and ten children were exposed to the factors routinely used in practice (referred to as the routine group). DAP to children was measured with a DAP meter, and ESD was calculated using measured DAP and data from the National Radiological Protection Board. Data were compared between groups.
ESD ranges in the target group were 32–202 μGy (chest AP), 57–333 μGy (abdomen AP) and 52–372 μGy (pelvis AP). For every radiographic procedure, chi-square Student’s t tests showed a significant difference in average ESD and DAP between the two groups (P < 0.005). Most ESD values from the routine group were two times higher than those from the target group.
The study established a convenient method to set appropriate exposure parameters (mAs) to reach a target EI using the child’s weight and height in pediatric radiography. By this method, ESD and DAP can be significantly reduced in children.
KeywordsRadiation dose Pediatrics Digital radiography Exposure index Radiation protection
- 1.UNSCEAR (1988) Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR report. United Nations Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 2.International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, ICRP publication 60. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 3.National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1981) Radiation protection in pediatric radiology, NCRP Report No. 68. NCRP, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- 4.European Commission (1996) European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in pediatrics, Report EUR 16261. Office for offcial publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- 7.International Commission on Radiological Protection (2004) Managing patient dose in digital radiology. ICRP publication 93. Elsevier, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 9.International Electrotechnical Commission (2008) Medical electrical equipment—exposure index of digital x-ray imaging systems—part 1: definitions and requirements for general radiography. IEC 62494–1:5Google Scholar
- 11.American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2009) Recommended exposure indicator for digital radiography. Report of AAPM task group #116Google Scholar
- 12.National Radiological Protection Board (2000) Reference doses and patient size in pediatric radiology. NRPB-R318, NRPB, ChiltonGoogle Scholar
- 13.European Commission (1996) European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. EUR 16260Google Scholar
- 14.National Radiological Protection Board (1992) National protocol for patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. Didcot, Oxford, ChiltonGoogle Scholar
- 17.Davies M, McCallum H, White G et al (1997) Patient dose audit in diagnostic radiography using custom designed software. Radiography 3:17–25Google Scholar
- 20.American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2002) Quality control in diagnostic radiology. AAPM Report 74, MadisonGoogle Scholar
- 21.American College of Radiology (2006) ACR technical standard for diagnostic medical physics performance monitoring of radiographic and fluoroscopic equipment. ACR, RestonGoogle Scholar
- 25.American College of Radiology (2007) Practice guideline for digital radiography. Available via http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/digital_radioraphy.asp. Accessed 17 June 2010
- 28.European Commission (1999) Radiation protection 109: guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures. ECGoogle Scholar