Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 115–118 | Cite as

Contrast meals and malrotation in children—metal markers for improved accuracy

  • Gerrit Dekker
  • Savvas Andronikou
  • Jaco Greyling
  • Brand Louw
  • Andrew Brandt
Technical Innovation


Upper gastrointestinal contrast studies in children may cause false-positive or -negative diagnosis of intestinal malrotation from rotation of the patient. To alleviate this problem, skin markers can be used to reduce rotation of children undergoing this procedure, e.g., two metal markers (sheathed and sealed hypodermic needles) can be fixed onto the skin for gastro-intestinal contrast studies. We reviewed two Katz criteria influenced by patient rotation: duodenojejunal junction on or to the right of the left pedicle and pylorus to the left of the midline. A test group was positioned using markers; a control group without markers was positioned conventionally. Markers during a pilot study were applied, but positioning was done by helpers who had no on-screen visualization. In the test group, only 1 child (3%; n = 39) had a feature of malrotation. In the control group, there were features of malrotation in 12 children (25%; n = 48). No other features of malrotation were seen. The pilot study showed radiographic rotation with markers projecting off the midline in 78% of 58 children. This resulted in 48% of 58 patients having false features of malrotation. The use of metal skin markers results in reduction of rotational errors that could have caused false diagnosis of intestinal malrotation in children.


Malrotation Volvulus GIT Barium meal 


  1. 1.
    Yousefzadeh DK, Kang L, Tessicini L (2010) Assessment of retromesenteric position of the third portion of the duodenum: an US feasibility study in 33 newborns. Pediatr Radiol 40:1476–1484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yousefzadeh DK (2009) The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 2):S172–S177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor GA (2011) CT appearance of the duodenum and mesenteric vessels in children with normal and abnormal bowel rotation. Pediatr Radiol 41:1378–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millar AJ, Rode H, Cywes S (2003) Malrotation and volvulus in infancy and childhood. Semin Pediatr Surg 12:229–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamal IM (2000) Defusing the intra-abdominal ticking bomb: intestinal malrotation in children. CMAJ 162:1315–1317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Long FR, Kramer SS, Markowitz RI et al (1996) Radiographic patterns of intestinal malrotation in children. Radiographics 16:547–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seashore JH, Touloukian RJ (1994) Midgut volvulus. An ever-present threat. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148:43–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rasmussen L, Qvist N, Hansen LP et al (1987) Intestinal malrotation without volvulus in infancy and childhood. Z Kinderchir 42:19–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz ME, Siegel MJ, Shackelford GD et al (1987) The position and mobility of the duodenum in children. Am J Roentgenol 148:947–951Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerrit Dekker
    • 2
  • Savvas Andronikou
    • 1
  • Jaco Greyling
    • 2
  • Brand Louw
    • 2
  • Andrew Brandt
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Deparment of Diagnostic RadiologyFaculty of Health Sciences, University of StellenboschCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations