Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 42, Issue 9, pp 1099–1106 | Cite as

Contrast enema findings in patients presenting with poor functional outcome after primary repair for Hirschsprung disease

  • Kevin M. Garrett
  • Marc A. Levitt
  • Alberto Peña
  • Steven J. Kraus
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The radiologic evaluation of Hirschsprung disease is well described in the literature. However, there is a paucity of literature describing the appearance of the neo-rectum and colon after repair, specifically describing findings in patients with poor functional outcome, which would suggest the need for reoperation.

Objective

We describe findings on contrast enema and correlate them with surgical findings at reoperation in children with poor functional outcome after primary repair for Hirschsprung disease who suffer from bowel dysfunction that can manifest with either soiling or obstructive symptoms such as enterocolitis.

Materials and methods

Children were identified from our colorectal surgery database. At the time of abstract submission, 35 children had contrast enemas prior to reoperation. Additional children continue to present for evaluation. The majority of children included in the study had their primary repair performed elsewhere. The initial procedures included: Duhamel (n = 11), Soave (n = 20) or Swenson (n = 3). One child had undergone a primary Soave repair and subsequently had a Swenson-type reoperation but continued to have a poor outcome. One child’s initial surgical repair could not be determined. Images were reviewed by a staff pediatric radiologist and a pediatric radiology fellow.

Results

Findings encountered on contrast enema in these children include a distal narrowed segment due to stricture or aganglionic/transitional zone segment (8), dilated/hypomotile distal segment (7), thickened presacral space due to compressing Soave cuff (11), dilated Duhamel pouch (8), active enterocolitis (3) and partially obstructing twist of the pull-through segment (1).

Conclusion

Multiple anatomical and pathological complications exist that can lead to bowel dysfunction in children after repair of Hirschsprung disease. Little recent literature exists regarding the radiographic findings in children. We had the opportunity to review a substantial series of these children, describe the contrast enema findings in these difficult cases and correlate them with operative findings. Radiologic evaluation is key to assessing such patients; it defines the potential anatomical problem with the pull-through and facilitates surgical planning.

Keywords

Hirschsprung Reoperation Bowel function Contrast enema Children 

References

  1. 1.
    Hirschsprung H (1888) Stuhlträgheit neugeborener infolge von dilatation und hypertrophic des colons. Jb Inderheilk 27:1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levitt MA, Dickie B, Peña A (2010) Evaluation and treatment of the patient with Hirschsprung disease who is not doing well after a pull-through procedure. Semin Pediatr Surg 19:146–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swenson O, Bill A (1948) Resection of the rectum and rectosigmoid with preservation of the sphincter for benign spastic lesions producing megacolon. Surg 24:212–220Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duhamel B (1956) Une nouvelle opération pour le mégacolon congénital: L’abaissement rétrorectal et trans-anal du colon, et son application possible au traitement de quelques autres malformations. Press Méd 64:2249–2250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soave F (1964) A new surgical technique for treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease. Surg 56:1007–1014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    White F, Langer J (2000) Circumferential distribution of ganglion cells in the transition zone of children with Hirschsprung disease. Pediatr Dev Pathol 3:216–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kobayashi H, Hirakawa H, Surana R et al (1995) Intestinal neuronal dysplasia is a possible cause of persistent bowel symptoms after pull-through operation for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 30:253–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jamieson DH, Dundas SE, Belushi SA et al (2004) Does the transition zone reliably delineate aganglionic bowel in Hirschsprung’s disease? Pediatr Radiol 34:811–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langer JC, Durrant AC, de la Torre L et al (2003) One-stage transanal Soave pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease: a multicenter experience with 141 children. Ann Surg 238:569–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Obermayr F, Szavay P, Beschorner R et al (2009) Outcome of transanal endorectal pull-through in patients with Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:220–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marty T, Seo T, Matlak M et al (1995) Gastrointestinal function after surgical correction of Hirschsprung’s disease: long-term follow-up in 135 patients. J Pediatr Surg 30:655–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vieten D, Spicer R (2004) Enterocolitis complicating Hirschsprung’s disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 13:263–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elhalaby EA, Coran AG, Blane CE et al (1995) Enterocolitis associated with Hirschsprung’s disease: a clinical-radiological characterization based on 168 patients. J Pediatr Surg 30:76–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Bauer C et al (2009) Treatment of fecal incontinence with a comprehensive bowel management program. J Pediatr Surg 6:1278–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keshtgar AS, Ward HC, Clayden GS et al (2003) Investigations for incontinence and constipation after surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease in children. Pediatr Surg Int 19:4–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schweizer P, Berger S, Schweizer M et al (2007) Repeated pull-through surgery for complicated Hirschsprung’s disease–principles derived from clinical experience. J Pediatr Surg 42:536–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teitelbaum DH, Coran AG (2003) Reoperative surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 12:124–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pena A, Elicevik M, Levitt MA (2007) Reoperations in Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 42:1008–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Feiter PW, Soeters PB, Dejong CH (2006) Rectal perforations after barium enema: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 49:261–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ACR manual on contrast media version 7 (2010) Contrast media in children. Available via http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/contrast_manual/Children.aspx. Accessed 17 June 2010

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin M. Garrett
    • 1
  • Marc A. Levitt
    • 3
  • Alberto Peña
    • 3
  • Steven J. Kraus
    • 2
  1. 1.Memphis Radiological PCGermantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.Colorectal Center for ChildrenCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations