Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, 41:951 | Cite as

Rebalancing the risks of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance imaging

  • S. Bruce GreenbergEmail author
Commentary

The concern for fatal cancers caused by ionizing radiation exposure associated with the increased use of CT in children is well documented. Inappropriate adult CT techniques applied to children can result in excessive radiation exposure [1], exposures similar to the dose received by a group of nuclear bomb survivors who later developed an increased cancer rate [2, 3]. CT examinations are projected by some to eventually account for up to 1.5–2.0% of future cancers in the United States [4]. Although only 7% of CT scans are in children, they are expected to account for up to 15% of the additional cancers because of increased life expectancy and sensitivity of children to radiation. Risk estimates for excess cancer mortality from radiation exposure of 1 death per 2,000 scans assume an effective dose of 10 mSv per scan and a risk of 5% per sievert [4].

MRI by contrast is perceived as a panacea for many applications performed by CT because it uses no ionizing radiation. General anesthesia...

Keywords

Radiation Exposure Appendicitis Ionize Radiation Exposure Anesthesia Risk Excessive Radiation Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 176:297–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. NEJM 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melloni C (2007) Anesthesia and sedation outside the operating room: how to prevent risk and maintain good quality. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 20:513–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Serafini G, Zadra N (2008) Anaesthesia for MRI in the paediatric patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:499–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melloni C (2007) Anesthesia and sedation outside the operating room: how to prevent risk and maintain good quality. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 20:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Girshin M, Shapiro V, Rhee A et al (2009) Increased risk of general anesthesia for high-risk patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:312–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Creeley CE, Olney JW (2010) The young: neuroapoptosis induced by anesthetics and what to do about it. Anesth Analg 10:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilder RT (2010) Is there any relationship between long-term behavior disturbance and early exposure to anesthesia? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 23:332–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hays SR, Deshpande JK (2011) Newly postulated neurodevelopmental risks of pediatric anesthesia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 11:205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rappaport B, Mellon D, Simone A et al (2011) Defining safe use of anesthesia in children. New Engl J Med 364:1387–1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR 191:611–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pediatric CT scans. Cancer incidence among children undergoing computed tomography scans. National Cancer Institute. Available via http://dceg.cancer.gov/reb/research/ionizing/medical/4. Accessed 30 Mar 2011
  15. 15.
    Epidemiological study to quantify risks for paediatric computerized tomography and to optimize doses. (EPI-CT) European Commission CORDIS. Available via http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=FP7_PROJ_EN&ACTION=D&DOC=24&CAT=PROJ&QUERY=011e95568257:32be:4007801f&RCN=97571. Accessed 30 Mar 2011
  16. 16.
    Greenberg SB, Bhutta S, Braswell L et al (2011) Computed tomography angiography in children with cardiovascular disease: low dose techniques and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. [Epub ahead of print] Jan 7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paul JF, Rohnean A, Elfassy E et al (2011) Radiation dose for thoracic and coronary step-and-shoot CT using a 128-slice dual-source machine in infants and small children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 41:244–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Glass NL, Malviya S (2011) Anesthesia in children—limitations of the data on neurotoxicity. New Engl J Med 364:1466–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim JE, Newman B (2010) Evaluation of a radiation dose reduction strategy for pediatric chest CT. AJR 194:1188–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J et al (2010) A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR 195:1095–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Balvay D, Kachenoura N, Espinoza S et al (2011) Signal-to-noise improvement in dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with automated principal component analysis filtering. Radiology 258:435–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s HospitalLittle RockUSA

Personalised recommendations