Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1139–1145

MRI of acquired posterior urethral diverticulum following surgery for anorectal malformations

  • Daniel J. Podberesky
  • Nicholas C. Weaver
  • Christopher G. Anton
  • Taiwo Lawal
  • Miller C. Hamrick
  • Shumyle Alam
  • Alberto Peña
  • Marc A. Levitt
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD) is one of the most common postoperative complications associated with anorectal malformation (ARM) correction.

Objective

To describe our MRI protocol for evaluating acquired PUD following ARM surgery, and associated imaging findings.

Materials and methods

Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed 61 pelvic MRI examinations performed for postoperative ARM for PUD identification and characteristics. Associated clinical, operative and cystoscopy reports were also reviewed and compared to MRI.

Results

An abnormal retrourethral focus suspicious for PUD was identified at MRI in 13 patients. Ten of these patients underwent subsequent surgery or cystoscopy, and PUD was confirmed in five. All of the confirmed PUD cases appeared as cystic lesions that were at least 1 cm in diameter in two imaging planes. Four of the false-positive cases were punctate retrourethral foci that were visible only on a single MRI plane. One patient had a seminal vesical cyst mimicking a PUD.

Conclusion

Pelvic MRI can be a useful tool in the postoperative assessment of suspected PUD associated with ARM. Radiologists should have a high clinical suspicion for a postoperative PUD when a cystic lesion posterior to the bladder/posterior urethra is encountered on two imaging planes in these patients.

Keywords

Anorectal malformation Posterior urethral diverticulum Children MRI 

References

  1. 1.
    Eltomey MA, Donnelly LF, Emery KH et al (2008) Posteroperative pelvic MRI of anorectal malformations. AJR 191:1469–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koga H, Okazaki T, Yamakata A et al (2005) Posterior urethral diverticulum after laparoscopic-assisted repair of high-type anorectal malformation in a male patient: surgical treatment and prevention. Pediatr Surg Int 21:58–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong AR, Acuña MF, Peña A et al (2002) Urologic injuries associated with repair of anorectal malformation in male patients. J Pediatr Surg 37:339–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McHugh K (1998) The role of radiology in children with anorectal anomalies: with particular emphasis on MRI. Eur J Radiol 26:194–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nievelstein RA, Vos A, Valk J (1998) MR imaging of anorectal malformations and associated anomalies. Eur Radiol 8:573–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Currarino G (1969) Diverticulum of prostatic urethra developing postoperatively from stump of congenital rectourethral fistula. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 106:211–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vinnicombe SJ, Good CD, Hall CM (1996) Posterior urethral diverticula: a complication of surgery for high anorectal malformations. Pediatr Radiol 26:120–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peña A, Grasshoff S, Levitt M (2007) Reoperations in anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 42:318–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mickelson JJ, MacNeily AE, Blair GK (2007) The posterior urethra in anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 42:585–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levitt MA, Pena A (2010) Imperforate anus and cloacal malformations. In: Holcomb W, Murphy JP (eds) Ashcraft’s pediatric surgery, 5th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 468–490Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams DI, Grant J (1969) Urological complications of imperforate anus. Br J Urol 41:660–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baughman SM, Richardson RR, Podberesky DJ et al (2007) 3-Dimensional magnetic resonance genitography: a different look at cloacal malformations. J Urol 178:1675–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boechat MI (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric pelvis. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 4:679–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nghiem HT, Kellman GM, Sandberg SA et al (1990) Cystic lesions of the prostate. Radiographics 10:635–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim B, Kawashima A, Ryu JA et al (2009) Imaging of the seminal vesicle and vas deferens. Radiographics 29:1105–1121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Curran S, Akin O, Agildere AM et al (2007) Endorectal MRI of prostatic and periprostatic cystic lesions and their mimics. AJR 188:1373–1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Podberesky
    • 1
  • Nicholas C. Weaver
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher G. Anton
    • 1
  • Taiwo Lawal
    • 3
    • 4
  • Miller C. Hamrick
    • 3
  • Shumyle Alam
    • 5
  • Alberto Peña
    • 3
  • Marc A. Levitt
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity College HospitalIbadanNigeria
  5. 5.Department of UrologyCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations