Pediatric Radiology

, 41:1000 | Cite as

Repeatability of cardiac-MRI-measured right ventricular size and function in congenital heart disease

  • Rowan Walsh
  • Yishay Salem
  • Amee Shah
  • Wyman W. Lai
  • James C. NielsenEmail author
Original Article



The measurement error for right ventricular (RV) size and function assessed by cardiac MRI (CMRI) in congenital heart disease has not been fully characterized. As CMRI parameters are being increasingly utilized to make clinical decisions, defining error in the clinical setting is critical.


This investigation examines the repeatability of CMRI for RV size and function.

Materials and methods

Forty consecutive people with congenital heart disease involving the RV were retrospectively identified. Contouring of RV volumes was performed by two expert CMRI clinicians. The coefficient of variability and repeatability coefficients were calculated. Repeatability coefficients were multiplied by the mean value for each group studied to define a threshold beyond which measurement error was unlikely to be responsible.


The variability for indexed RV end-diastolic volume = 3.2% and 3.3% for intra- and interobserver comparisons, respectively. The repeatability coefficients were 13.2% and 14.9% for intra- and interobserver comparisons, which yielded threshold values of 15.1 ml/m^2 and 20.2 ml/m^2, respectively. For RV ejection fraction (EF), the repeatability coefficients for intra- and interobserver comparisons were 5.0% and 6.0%, which resulted in threshold values of 2.6 EF% and 3.0 EF%.


The threshold values generated can be used during serial assessment of RV size and function.


Congenital heart disease Tetralogy of Fallot Ventricular size Children Cardiac MRI 



Cardiac MRI


Ejection fraction


Right ventricle


Tetralogy of Fallot

Supplementary material

Esm 1

(MP4 1291 kb)


  1. 1.
    Lai WW, Gauvreau K, Rivera ES et al (2008) Accuracy of guideline recommendations for two-dimensional quantification of the right ventricle by echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:691–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H et al (2010) Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 31:794–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Therrien J, Provost Y, Merchant N et al (2005) Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Am J Cardiol 95:779–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW et al (2007) Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 116:545–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geva T (2006) Indications and timing of pulmonary valve replacement after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 11–22Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mooij CF, de Wit CJ, Graham DA et al (2008) Reproducibility of MRI measurements of right ventricular size and function in patients with normal and dilated ventricles. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:67–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winter MM, Bernink FJ, Groenink M et al (2008) Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fratz S, Schuhbaeck A, Buchner C et al (2009) Comparison of accuracy of axial slices versus short-axis slices for measuring ventricular volumes by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 103:1764–1769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luijnenburg SE, Robbers-Visser D, Moelker A et al (2010) Intra-observer and interobserver variability of biventricular function, volumes and mass in patients with congenital heart disease measured by CMR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:57–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Bakan A et al (2004) Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:9–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, Van der Velde EA et al (1995) Reproducibility of MRI-derived measurements of right ventricular volumes and myocardial mass. Magn Reson Imaging 13:53–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strugnell WE, Slaughter RE, Riley RA et al (2005) Modified RV short axis series—a new method for cardiac MRI measurement of right ventricular volumes. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:769–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lytrivi ID, Ko HH, Srivastava S et al (2004) Regional differences in right ventricular systolic function as determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging after infundibulotomy. Am J Cardiol 94:970–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Measurement error. BMJ 313:744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geva T, Powell AJ (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Feltes TF, Shaddy RE (eds) Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 163–199Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alfakih K, Plein S, Bloomer T et al (2003) Comparison of right ventricular volume measurements between axial and short axis orientation using steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rowan Walsh
    • 1
  • Yishay Salem
    • 1
  • Amee Shah
    • 2
  • Wyman W. Lai
    • 2
  • James C. Nielsen
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Pediatric CardiologyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital of New York PresbyterianNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Mount Sinai Children’s Heart CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations