Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 483–487 | Cite as

Borderline low conus medullaris on infant lumbar sonography: what is the clinical outcome and the role of neuroimaging follow-up?

Original Article



Isolated borderline low conus medullaris is a frequent finding on screening lumbar sonography of unknown significance that often prompts further imaging and clinical follow-up.


To determine the clinical outcome and utility of follow-up neuroimaging in infants with isolated borderline low conus on lumbar sonography.

Materials and methods

We reviewed 748 consecutive spinal sonograms identifying infants with conus terminating between L2-L3 disc space and mid-L3 level without other findings of tethered cord. We excluded infants with conditions associated with developmental delay and those who passed away, and compared the age of gross motor milestone achievement to normal ranges. Follow-up imaging was reviewed.


Isolated borderline low conus was found in 90 of 748 infants (12%) on sonography. Seventy of those infants met inclusion criteria. Follow-up imaging in 11 children (10 MRI, 1 sonogram), showed change in conus position to “normal” level in 10, no change in 1, and no new findings within lumbar spine. Clinical follow-up was available in 50 of 70 (71%) children meeting inclusion criteria, with normal motor milestones met in all 50 children.


Isolated borderline low conus is a common finding in infants who meet normal developmental milestones suggesting that follow-up evaluation has little utility and is likely unwarranted.


Low-lying conus medullaris Tethered cord syndrome US MRI Infant 


  1. 1.
    Dick EA, Patel K, Owens CM et al (2002) Spinal ultrasound in infants. Br J of Radiol 75:384–392Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Irani N, Goud AR, Lowe LH (2006) Isolated filar cyst on lumbar spine sonography in infants: a case-control study. Pediatr Radiol 36:1283–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson D, Prince JR (1989) MR imaging determination of the location of the normal conus medullaris throughout childhood. AJR 152:1029–1032PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DiPietro MA (1993) The conus medullaris: normal US findings throughout childhood. Radiology 188:149–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Unsinn KM, Geley T, Freund MC et al (2000) US of the spinal cord in newborns: spectrum of normal findings, variants, congenital anomalies, and acquired diseases. Radiographics 20:923–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barson AJ (1970) The vertebral level of termination of the spinal cord during normal and abnormal development. J Anat 106:489–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sahin F, Selcuki M, Ecin N et al (1997) Level of conus medullaris in term and preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 77:F67–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kriss VM, Desai NS (1998) Occult spinal dysraphism in neonates: assessment of high-risk cutaneous stigmata on sonography. AJR 171:1687–1692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bui CJ, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ (2007) Tethered cord syndrome in children: a review. Neurosurg Focus 23:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lowe LH, Johanek AJ, Moore CW (2007) Sonography of the neonatal spine: part 1, Normal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and variations that may simulate disorders. AJR 188:733–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lowe LH, Johanek AJ, Moore CW (2007) Sonography of the neonatal spine: part 2, Spinal disorders. AJR 188:739–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitz C (1975) The tethered conus. AJR 125:512–523Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Missouri–Kansas City, School of MedicineKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City, Children’s Mercy Hospital and ClinicsKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations