Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 40, Issue 10, pp 1615–1624 | Cite as

Feasibility of 3-T MRI for the evaluation of Crohn disease in children

  • Charuta Dagia
  • Michael Ditchfield
  • Michael Kean
  • Anthony Catto-Smith
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Crohn disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract from the oral cavity to the anal canal. It occurs in all ages and is a significant cause for morbidity in children. Interest in MRI evaluation of CD has increased because of the concern regarding cumulative radiation dose from contrast fluoroscopic studies and CT. Several reports have demonstrated MRI to be a useful technique for CD. Most of these studies were performed at 1.5-T field strength. Imaging at a higher field strength, with a greater signal-to-noise ratio, has the potential of reducing scan times and increasing the resolution. However, there is a concurrent increase in artefacts, and these can be pronounced with abdominal imaging at 3 T.

Objective

To determine the feasibility of 3-T MRI for CD in children and to assess the value of different sequences and the effect of artefacts that could potentially limit the role of bowel MR imaging at higher field strengths.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study of 46 children with biopsy-proven CD (ages 8–19 years, 53% boys) was performed. Sixty-eight consecutive MRI studies were performed on a 3-T scanner between 2005 and 2007; 42 of the abdomen (62%) and 26 of the pelvis/perineum (38%). Sorbitol was administered for the abdominal studies; orally for 36/42 (86%) studies and via a naso-jejunal (NJ) tube for 6/42 (14%) studies. For the abdomen, T2-W half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (T2-W HASTE), true steady-state free precession (true FISP), pre-contrast and contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-volume interpolated gradient-echo (T1-W VIBE) and CE T1-W fast low-angle shot (T1-W FLASH) sequences were performed. For the perianal and pelvic assessment, fat-saturated T2-W turbo spin-echo (TSE), pre-contrast and CE T1-W FLASH or VIBE sequences were performed. The sequences were scored for diagnostic quality by two paediatric radiologists for visualisation of the bowel wall, whether normal or pathological and the visualization of extra intestinal manifestations. The effects of distension, susceptibility artefact and motion were assessed.

Results

Six (14%) abdominal MRI studies were normal. Thirty-six (86%) were abnormal with good correlation with endoscopic findings. The pelvic and perianal MRI studies were all abnormal (26/26, 100%) with good correlation with proctoscopy and examination under anaesthesia. All the sequences had high average scores (greater than or close to 3), except true FISP with a score of 2.4. The score was greatest in those who had NJ administration of sorbitol; however, satisfactory distension was also possible with oral administration of contrast. True FISP was the sequence most affected by a combination of suboptimal distension and artefact from colonic contents. With adequate distension, true FISP image quality improved remarkably. The overall score of this sequence was satisfactory in the absence of susceptibility and movement artefact.

Conclusion

With appropriate attention to technique, with optimal distension and control of movement, high-quality, 3-T assessment of the abdomen, pelvis and perineum is possible. All sequences used at 1.5 T can be used at 3 T, however true FISP was the most prone to artefact.

Keywords

Crohn disease 3 T MRI Artefact Child 

References

  1. 1.
    Hyams JS et al (2007) Inflammatory bowel disease. In: Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB (eds) Nelson textbook of Pediatrics, 18th edn. Saunders, Detroit, pp 1580–1585Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mamula P, Markowitz JE, Baldassano RN (2003) Inflammatory bowel disease in early childhood and adolescence: special considerations. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 32:967–995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dagia C, Ditchfield M, Kean M et al (2008) Imaging for Crohn disease: use of 3-T MRI in a paediatric setting. J Med Imaging Radiat Onc 52:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Essary B, Kim J, Anupindi S et al (2007) Pelvic MRI in children with Crohn disease and suspected perianal involvement. Pediatr Radiol 37:201–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IBD Working Group of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (2005) Inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents: recommendations for diagnosis—the Porto criteria. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 41:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toma P, Granata C, Magnano G et al (2007) CT & MRI of paediatric Crohns disease. Pediatr Radiol 37:1083–1092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magnano G, Granata C, Barabino A et al (2003) Polyethylene glycol and contrast-enhanced MRI of Crohn’s disease in children: preliminary experience. Pediatr Radiol 33:385–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hugot JP, Bellaiche M (2007) Inflammatory bowel diseases: the paediatric gastroenterologist’s perspective. Pediatr Radiol 37:1065–1070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alexopoulou E, Roma E, Loggitsi D et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel in children with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease: evaluation of disease activity. Pediatr Radiol 39:791–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Gemert-Horsthuis K, Florie J, Hommes DW et al (2006) Feasibility of evaluating Crohn’s disease activity at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:340–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schick F (2005) Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limitations and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 15:946–959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rimola J, Rodríguez S, García-Bosch O et al (2009) Role of 3.0-T MR Colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics 29:701–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Debatin JF, Patak MA (1999) MRI of the small and large bowel. Eur Radiol 9:1523–1534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prassopoulos P, Papanikolau N, Grammatikakis J et al (2001) MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics 21:S161–S172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schindera ST, Merkle EM, Dale BM et al (2006) Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? Acad Radiol 13:1236–1243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Magnano G, Granata C, Barabino A et al (2003) Polyethylene glycol and contrast-enhanced MRI of Crohn’s disease in children: preliminary experience. Pediatr Radiol 33:385–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Stoker J (2005) MRI in Crohn’s Disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin DR, Danrad R, Herrmann K et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. Top Magn Reson Imag 16:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Froehlich JM (2007) Small bowel MR imaging: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:383–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lauenstein TC, Saar B, Martin DR (2007) MR colonography: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:395–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malago R, Manfredi R, Benini L et al (2008) Assessment of Crohn’s disease activity in the small bowel with MR-enteroclysis: clinico-radiological correlations. Abdom Imaging 33:669–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ et al (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR 177:1325–1332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koelbel G, Schmiedl U, Majer MC et al (1989) Diagnosis of fistulae and sinus tracts in patients with Crohn disease: value of MR imaging. AJR 152:999–1003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clinical Practice Committee (2003) American Gastroenterological Association: medical position statement: perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 125:1503–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charuta Dagia
    • 1
  • Michael Ditchfield
    • 1
  • Michael Kean
    • 1
  • Anthony Catto-Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical Imaging and Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteThe Royal Children’s HospitalVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Children’s HospitalVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations