Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 598–607 | Cite as

Clinical application of automated Greulich-Pyle bone age determination in children with short stature

  • David D. Martin
  • Dorothee Deusch
  • Roland Schweizer
  • Gerhard Binder
  • Hans Henrik Thodberg
  • Michael B. Ranke
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Bone age (BA) rating is time consuming and highly rater dependent.

Objective

To adjust the fully automated BoneXpert method to agree with the manual Greulich and Pyle BA (GP BA) ratings of five raters and to validate the accuracy for short children.

Materials and methods

A total of 1,097 left hand radiographs from 188 children with short stature, including growth hormone deficiency (44%) and Turner syndrome (29%) were evaluated.

Results

BoneXpert rejected 14 of the 1,097 radiographs, and deviated by more than 1.9 years from the operator BA for 27 radiographs. These were rerated blindly by four operators. Of the 27 new ratings, 26 were within 1.9 years of the automatic BA values. The root mean square deviation between manual and automatic rating was 0.72 years (95% CI 0.69–0.75).

Conclusion

BoneXpert’s ability to process 99% of images automatically without errors, and to obtain good agreement with an operator suggests that the method is efficient and reliable for short children.

Keywords

Automatic bone age Greulich-Pyle BoneXpert Skeletal maturity Short stature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Gabriele von Oldershausen for her excellent support in finding the radiographs, scanning and data management, Dr. K. Drews from the Tübingen Radiology Department for advice and for rerating the 27 outliers, and NovoNordisk for lending us the Vidar scanner.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen E (1971) Comparison of Tanner-Whitehouse and Greulich-Pyle methods in a large scale Danish Survey. Am J Phys Anthropol 35:373–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berst MJ, Dolan L, Bogdanowicz MM et al (2001) Effect of knowledge of chronologic age on the variability of pediatric bone age determined using the Greulich and Pyle standards. AJR 176:507–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Pedersen KD (2009) The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:52–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Thodberg HH (2009) Automatic determination of Greulich-Pyle bone age in healthy Dutch children. Pediatr Radiol 39. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1090-8
  5. 5.
    Tanner JM, Gibbons R (1994) A computerized image analysis system for estimating Tanner-Whitehouse 2 bone age. Horm Res 42:282–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pietka E (1995) Computer-assisted bone age assessment based on features automatically extracted from a hand radiograph. Comput Med Imaging Graph 19:251–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. Martin
    • 1
  • Dorothee Deusch
    • 1
  • Roland Schweizer
    • 1
  • Gerhard Binder
    • 1
  • Hans Henrik Thodberg
    • 2
  • Michael B. Ranke
    • 1
  1. 1.Paediatric Endocrinology SectionUniversity Children’s HospitalTuebingenGermany
  2. 2.VisianaHolteDenmark

Personalised recommendations