Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 488–491 | Cite as

Can classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section?

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is the term given to a fracture that most often occurs in the posteromedial aspect of the distal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia, and proximal humerus in infants; this finding is strongly associated with non-accidental injury.

Objective

To demonstrate that the CML may occur following simple lower segment caesarean section (LSCS).

Materials and methods

A review of 22 years of an obstetric practice that delivers 8,500 babies per year.

Results

We identified three neonates born by elective LSCS, each with distal femoral metaphyseal fractures on postpartum radiographs. All caesarean sections were elective and uncomplicated. External cephalic version was not employed preoperatively. Postpartum radiographs demonstrated a fracture of the distal femoral metaphysis in each neonate, typical of a CML.

Conclusion

We propose that a CML can occur in the setting of a simple, elective and uncomplicated LSCS where no external cephalic version is employed.

Keywords

Classic metaphyseal lesion Caesarean section Non-accidental injury 

References

  1. 1.
    Caffey J (1957) Some traumatic lesions in growing bones other than fractures and dislocations: clinical and radiologic features. Br J Radiol 30:225–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC, Blackbourne B (1986) The metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: a radiologic-histopathologic study. AJR 146:895–905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC (1998) A regional approach to the classic metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: the distal femur. AJR 170:43–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cumming WA (1979) Neonatal skeletal fractures. Birth trauma or child abuse? J Can Assoc Radiol 30:30–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ehrenfest H (1922) Birth Injuries of the child. Appleton-Century-Crofts, p 208Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camus M, Lefebvre G, Darbois Y et al (1985) Traumatismes obstetricaux du nouveau-ne. Enquete retrospective a propos de 20409 naissances. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 14:1033–1044Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curran JS (1981) Birth-associated injury. Clin Perinatol 8:111–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleinman PK (1998) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 2nd edn. Mosby, St Louis, p 219Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lysack JT, Soboleski D (2003) Classic metaphyseal lesion following external cephalic version and cesarean section. Pediatr Radiol 33:422–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carty H, Pierce A (2002) Non-accidental injury: a retrospective analysis of a large cohort. Eur Radiol 12:2919–2925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kleinman PK, Marks SC, Blackbourne BD et al (1995) Inflicted skeletal injury: a postmortem radiologic-histopathologic study in 31 infants. AJR 165:647–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lonergan GF, Baker AM, Boos SC et al (2003) From the archives of the AFIP. Child abuse: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 23:811–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleinman PK, Nimkin K, Spevak MR et al (1996) Follow-up skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse. AJR 167:893–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nadas S, Gudinchet F, Reinberg O et al (1993) Predisposing factors in obstetrical fractures. Skeletal Radiol 22:195–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radiology DepartmentChildren’s University HospitalDublin 1Ireland
  2. 2.Radiology DepartmentNational Maternity HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations