Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 33–40 | Cite as

Utilization of low-dose multidetector CT and virtual bronchoscopy in children with suspected foreign body aspiration

  • Ibrahim AdaletliEmail author
  • Sebuh Kurugoglu
  • Sila Ulus
  • Harun Ozer
  • Mehmet Elicevik
  • Fatih Kantarci
  • Ismail Mihmanli
  • Canan Akman
Original Article



Foreign body aspiration is common in children, especially those under 3 years of age. Chest radiography and CT are the main imaging modalities for the evaluation of these children. Management of children with suspected foreign body aspiration (SFBA) mainly depends on radiological findings.


To investigate the potential use of low-dose multidetector CT (MDCT) and virtual bronchoscopy (VB) in the evaluation and management of SFBA in children.

Materials and methods

Included in the study were 37 children (17 girls, 20 boys; age 4 months to 10 years, mean 32 months) with SFBA. Chest radiographs were obtained prior to MDCT in all patients. MDCT was performed using a low-dose technique. VB images were obtained in the same session. Conventional bronchoscopy (CB) was performed within 24 h on patients in whom an obstructive abnormality had been found by MDCT and VB.


Obstructive pathology was found in 16 (43.25%) of the 37 patients using MDCT and VB. In 13 of these patients, foreign bodies were detected and removed via CB. The foreign bodies were located in the right main bronchus (n = 5), in the bronchus intermedius (n = 6), in the medial segment of the middle lobe bronchus (n = 1), and in the left main bronchus (n = 1). In the remaining three patients, the diagnosis was false-positive for an obstructive pathology by MDCT and VB; the final diagnoses were secretions (n = 2) and schwannoma (n = 1), as demonstrated by CB. In 21 patients in whom no obstructive pathology was detected by MDCT and VB, CB was not performed. These patients were followed for 5–20 months without any recurrent obstructive symptomatology.


Low-dose MDCT and VB are non-invasive radiological modalities that can be used easily in the investigation of SFBA in children. MDCT and VB provide the exact location of the obstructive pathology prior to CB. If obstructive pathology is depicted with MDCT and VB, CB should be performed either for confirmation of the diagnosis or for the diagnosis of an alternative cause for the obstruction. In cases where no obstructive pathology is detected by MDCT and VB, CB may not be clinically useful.


Foreign body Aspiration Low-dose Multidetector CT Virtual bronchoscopy Children 


  1. 1.
    Cotton E, Yasuda K (1984) Foreign body aspiration. Pediatr Clin North Am 31:937–941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Svedstrom E, Puhakka H, Kero P (1989) How accurate is chest radiography in the diagnosis of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children? Pediatr Radiol 19:520–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paşaoğlu I, Doğan R, Demircin M (1990) Bronchoscopic removal of foreign bodies in children: Retrospective analysis of 822 cases. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 39:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mu L, He P, Sun D (1991) The causes and complications of late diagnosis of foreign body aspiration in children. Report of 210 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:876–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zerella JT, Dimler M, McGill LC, et al (1998) Foreign body aspiration in children: value of radiography and complications of bronchoscopy. J Pediatr Surg 33:1651–1654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciftci AO, Bingol-Kologlu M, Senocak ME, et al (2003) Bronchoscopy for evaluation of foreign body aspiration in children. J Pediatr Surg 38:1170–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zaytoun GM, Rouadi PW, Baki DH (2000) Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the tracheobronchial tree: predictive factors for complications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:311–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haliloglu M, Ciftci AO, Oto A, et al (2003) CT virtual bronchoscopy in the evaluation of children with suspected foreign body aspiration. Eur J Radiol 48:188–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kosucu P, Ahmetoglu A, Koramaz I, et al (2004) Low-dose MDCT and virtual bronchoscopy in pediatric patients with foreign body aspiration. AJR 183:1771–1777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Konen E, Katz M, Rozenman J, et al (1998) Virtual bronchoscopy in children: early clinical experience. AJR 171:1699–1702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lam WW, Tam PK, Chan FL, et al (2000) Esophageal atresia and tracheal stenosis: use of three-dimensional CT and virtual bronchoscopy in neonates, infants, and children. AJR 174:1009–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sorantin E, Geiger B, Lindbichler F, et al (2002) CT-based virtual tracheobronchoscopy in children – comparison with axial CT and multiplanar reconstruction: preliminary results. Pediatr Radiol 32:8–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Wever W, Bogaert J, Verschakelen JA (2005) Virtual bronchoscopy: accuracy and usefulness – an overview. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:364–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heyer CM, Kagel T, Lemburg SP, et al (2004) Evaluation of tracheobronchial anomalies in children using low-dose multidetector CT: report of a 13-year-old boy with a tracheal bronchus and recurrent pulmonary infections. Pediatr Pulmonol 38:168–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Woodard PK, Bhalla S, Javidan-Nejad C, et al (2006) Non-coronary cardiac CT imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 27:56–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoppe H, Walder B, Sonnenschein M, et al (2002) Multidetector CT virtual bronchoscopy to grade tracheobronchial stenosis. AJR 178:1195–1200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khan MF, Herzog C, Ackermann H, et al (2004) Virtual endoscopy of the tracheo-bronchial system: sub-millimeter collimation with the 16-row multidetector scanner. Eur Radiol 14:1400–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siegel MJ (2003) Multiplanar and three-dimensional multi-detector row CT of thoracic vessels and airways in the pediatric population. Radiology 229:641–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Summers RM, Shaw DJ, Shelhamer JH (1998) CT virtual bronchoscopy of simulated endobronchial lesions: effect of scanning, reconstruction, and display settings and potential pitfalls. AJR 170:947–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Daniel JC, Stevens DM, Cody DD (2005) Reducing radiation exposure from survey CT scans. AJR 185:509–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McHugh K (2005) CT dose reduction in pediatric patients. AJR 184:1706–1707PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ibrahim Adaletli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sebuh Kurugoglu
    • 1
  • Sila Ulus
    • 1
  • Harun Ozer
    • 1
  • Mehmet Elicevik
    • 2
  • Fatih Kantarci
    • 1
  • Ismail Mihmanli
    • 1
  • Canan Akman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical FacultyIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical FacultyIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations