Pediatric Radiology

, 37:11

Clinical approach to a child with abdominal pain who might have appendicitis

Minisymposium

Abstract

Appendicitis can usually be diagnosed on completion of a history and physical examination (abdominal pain, vomiting, right lower quadrant tenderness and guarding), although laboratory evaluation with a urinalysis and white blood cell count can be of assistance. In the few cases where doubt remains, plain films of the chest and abdomen can be helpful. Whether and when further imaging is indicated remains controversial. We reviewed reports of studies published since 2003 in which the sensitivity and specificity of CT and sonography for diagnosing appendicitis were determined. Sonography had an average sensitivity of 87.1% and an average specificity of 89.2% in the nine studies reported during that period. The average sensitivity of CT was 90.8% in 11 studies during that period, and there was an average specificity of 94.2% in 10 studies. We also looked at data from 299 patients who underwent appendectomies at our hospital. Of the appendices removed, only 10.7% did not have appendicitis. In many cases, CT or US imaging data were available in the form of reports or images or both from outside institutions. CT and US images were also available from our institution when the diagnosis was in question. This is how patients present in the real world—with studies that might not be the best, might not have been indicated, and might not have images available for another interpretation. Among patients operated on with neither CT nor US images, 10.9% did not have appendicitis. Among those in whom US imaging had been performed, 11.1% were negative for appendicitis, and among those in whom CT had been performed, 9.7% were negative. Although these studies were necessary because they were performed in patients whose diagnosis was the most difficult, it is in every patient’s best interest to have a thorough examination by a surgeon prior to having a CT scan.

Keywords

Appendicitis Abdominal pain Child 

References

  1. 1.
    Cappendijk VC, Hazebroek FW (2000) The impact of diagnostic delay on the course of acute appendicitis. Arch Dis Child 83:64–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nance ML, Adamson WT, Hedrick HL, et al (2000) Appendicitis in the young child: a continuing diagnostic challenge. Pediatr Emerg Care 16:160–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klein MD, Rabbani AB, Rood KD, et al (2001) Three quantitative approaches to the diagnosis of abdominal pain in children: practical applications of decision theory. J Pediatr Surg 36:1375–1380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kosloske AM, Love CL, Rohrer JE, et al (2004) The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation. Pediatrics 113:29–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hof KH, van Lankeren W, Krestin GP, et al (2004) Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 91:1641–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raman SS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, et al (2003) Patient gender-related performance of nonfocused helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:583–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoecker CC, Billman GF (2005) The utility of unenhanced computed tomography in appendicitis in children. J Emerg Med 28:415–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallinas-Victoriano F, Garde-Lecumberri C, Perez-Martinez A, et al (2004) Ultrasonography for surgical pathology discrimination in acute abdominal pain. Prospective study (in Spanish). Cir Pediatr 17:141–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, et al (2004) Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 141:537–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vazquez Ronco MA, Morteruel Arizkuren E, Garcia Ojeda E, et al (2003) Diagnostic yield of abdominal ultrasonography in acute appendicitis (in Spanish). An Pediatr (Barc) 58:556–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poh AC, Lin M, Teh HS, et al (2004) The role of computed tomography in clinically-suspected but equivocal acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 45:379–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stephen AE, Segev DL, Ryan DP, et al (2003) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT. J Pediatr Surg 38:367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf HK, et al (2004) Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 231:427–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smink DS, Finkelstein JA, Garcia Pena BM, et al (2004) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children using a clinical practice guideline. J Pediatr Surg 39:458–463; discussion 458–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, et al (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230:472–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tepel J, Sommerfeld A, Klomp HJ, et al (2004) Prospective evaluation of diagnostic modalities in suspected acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:219–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poortman P, Lohle PN, Schoemaker CM, et al (2003) Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded prospective study. AJR 181:1355–1359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Torbati SS, Guss DA (2003) Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 10:823–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T, et al (2005) The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. AJR 184:1802–1808PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Himeno S, Yasuda S, Oida Y, et al (2003) Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 28:39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van den Ende ED, Boellaard WP, Allema JH, et al (2003) Diagnostic surplus value of echography in children with acute abdominal pain (in Dutch). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 147:1174–1177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Breda Vriesman AC, Kole BJ, Puylaert JB (2003) Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 13:2278–2282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital of MichiganWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations