Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 8, pp 823–832 | Cite as

Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians

  • Karen E. ThomasEmail author
  • June E. Parnell-Parmley
  • Salwa Haidar
  • Rahim Moineddin
  • Ellen Charkot
  • Guila BenDavid
  • Connie Krajewski
Original Article



There is increasing awareness among pediatric radiologists of the potential risks associated with ionizing radiation in medical imaging. However, it is not known whether there has been a corresponding increase in awareness among pediatricians.


To establish the level of awareness among pediatricians of the recent publicity on radiation risks in children, knowledge of the relative doses of radiological investigations, current practice regarding parent/patient discussions, and the sources of educational input.

Materials and methods

Multiple-choice survey.


Of 220 respondents, 105 (48%) were aware of the 2001 American Journal of Roentgenology articles on pediatric CT and radiation, though only 6% were correct in their estimate of the quoted lifetime excess cancer risk associated with radiation doses equivalent to pediatric CT. A sustained or transient increase in parent questioning regarding radiation doses had been noticed by 31%. When estimating the effective doses of various pediatric radiological investigations in chest radiograph (CXR) equivalents, 87% of all responses (and 94% of CT estimates) were underestimates. Only 15% of respondents were familiar with the ALARA principle. Only 14% of pediatricians recalled any relevant formal teaching during their specialty training. The survey response rate was 40%.


Awareness of radiation protection issues among pediatricians is generally low, with widespread underestimation of relative doses and risks.


Pediatrician survey Radiation dose awareness ALARA principle 



We thank the technical staff of the Department of Diagnostic Imaging at the Hospital for Sick Children for their help and support of this project.


  1. 1.
    Donnelly LF (2002) Lessons from history. Pediatr Radiol 32:287–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doll R, Wakeford R (1997) Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Br J Radiol 70:130–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levy AR, Goldberg MS, Hanley JA, et al (1994) Projecting the lifetime risk of cancer from exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Health Phys 66:621–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Modan B, Keinan L, Blumstein T, et al (2000) Cancer following cardiac catheterization in childhood. Int J Epidemiol 29:424–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doody M, Michele MS, Lonstein JE, et al (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the US Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine 25:2052–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Infante-Rivard C, Mathonnet G, Sinnett D (2000) Risk of childhood leukemia associated with diagnostic irradiation and polymorphisms in DNA repair genes. Environ Health Perspect 108:495–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shu X-O, Jin F, Linet MS, et al (1994) Diagnostic X-ray and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer 70:531–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL, et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part 1. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication no. 60. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 176:297–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR 176:303–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sternberg S (2001) CT scans in children linked to cancer later. USA Today, January 22Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Donnelly LF, Frush DP (2001) Fallout from recent articles on radiation dose and pediatric CT. Pediatr Radiol 31:338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quinn AD, Taylor CG, Sabharwal T, et al (1997) Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists. Br J Radiol 70:102–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, et al (2003) Doctor’s knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327:371–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee CL, Haims AH, Monico EP, et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huda W (2002) Effective doses to adult and pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 32:272–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCollough CH, Schueler B (2000) Educational treatise – calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27:828–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huda W, Gkanatsios NA (1997) Effective dose and energy imparted in diagnostic radiology. Med Phys 24:1311–1316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas KE, Haidar S, Parnell-Parmley JE, et al (2006) Calculation of effective doses for pediatric radiological investigations. Manuscript under preparationGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    National Radiological Protection Board (1990) Patient dose reduction in diagnostic radiology. Documents of the NRPB, vol. 1, no. 3Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huda W, Slone R (2003) Review of radiologic physics (2nd edn). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nickoloff E (2002) Current adult and pediatric CT doses. Pediatr Radiol 32:250–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCollough CH, Zink FE (1999) Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys 26:2223–2230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Greess H, Nomayr A, Wolf H, et al (2002) Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE dose). Eur Radiol 12:1571–1576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    RSNA News (2003) Government may label radiation as carcinogen. RSNA news, March 2003Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Report on Carcinogens, Eleventh Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program.
  31. 31.
    Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA, et al (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Society of Pediatric Radiology (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference, 18–19 August 2001. Panel discussion. Pediatr Radiol 32:242–244Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Donnelly LF, Frush DP (2001) Fallout from recent articles on radiation dose and pediatric CT. Pediatr Radiol 31:338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    FDA (2001) Public Health Notification. Reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patientsGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Slovis TL (ed) (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference, 18–19 August 2001. Pediatr Radiol 32:217–313Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hollingsworth C, Frush DP, Cross M, et al (2003) Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. AJR 180:401–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC, et al (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75:819–830PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huda W, Atherton JV, Ware DE, et al (1997) An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. Radiology 203:417–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, et al (2005) Doses from computed tomography examinations in the UK–2003 review. NRPB-W67, NRPB Publications.
  40. 40.
    Picano E (2004) Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ 328:578–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    FDA (2005) What are the radiation risks from CT?
  42. 42.
    De Campo JF, Lau KKP, De Campo MP (2003) Is informed consent necessary for paediatric computed tomography? J Paediatr Child Health 39:399–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Frush D (2003) Responsible use of CT. Radiology 229:289–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2004) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen E. Thomas
    • 1
    Email author
  • June E. Parnell-Parmley
    • 1
  • Salwa Haidar
    • 2
  • Rahim Moineddin
    • 3
  • Ellen Charkot
    • 1
  • Guila BenDavid
    • 1
  • Connie Krajewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic ImagingThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMubarak Al-Kabeer HospitalSalmiyaKuwait
  3. 3.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations