Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 40–53

MDCT angiography of pediatric vascular diseases of the abdomen, pelvis, and extremities

Minisymposium

Abstract

Multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) enables rapid, noninvasive, high-resolution, and three-dimensional imaging of pediatric vascular diseases. In this paper, we explore the adaptation of the MDCT angiographic principles to pediatric patients for vascular diseases of the abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. Special emphasis is placed on the practical aspects of how to perform these studies. Optimizations of scan parameters, contrast medium usage, radiation dose, and three-dimensional image processing are discussed in detail. We provide practical guidance on how to choose between MR angiography and CT angiography. Finally, we review important pediatric vascular diseases, categorized into traumatic injuries, inherited vascular diseases, congenital vascular diseases, vasculitides, and surgical planning and assessment. In each category, we discuss how CT angiography can be tailored to maximize its clinical benefits.

Keywords

Computed tomography Angiography Radiation Pediatric imaging Vascular diseases 

References

  1. 1.
    Rubin GD (2003) MDCT imaging of the aorta and peripheral vessels. Eur J Radiol 45[Suppl 1]:S42-S49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norton KI (2003) Imaging applications in the evaluation of pediatric renal disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 15:186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phillips CD, Bubash LA (2002) CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of extracranial carotid vascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am 40:783–798PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    MacDonald SL, Mayo JR (2003) Computed tomography of acute pulmonary embolism. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 24:217–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, et al (2001) Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 221:146–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan FP (2003) Cardiac MDCT. In: Fishman EK, Jeffrey RB (eds) Multidetector CT: principles, techniques, and clinical applications. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 129–158Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng YF, Chen CL, Jawan B, et al (2003) Multislice computed tomography angiography in pediatric liver transplantation. Transplantation 76:353–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fidler JL, Cheatham JP, Fletcher SE, et al (2000) CT angiography of complications in pediatric patients treated with intravascular stents. AJR 174:355–359Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gulati MS, Paul SB, Arora NK, et al (2000) Esophageal and gastric vasculature in children with extrahepatic portal hypertension: evaluation by intravenous CT portography. Clin Imaging 24:351–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norton KI (2003) New imaging applications in the evaluation of pediatric renal disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 15:186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park JH (1996) Conventional and CT angiographic diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis. Int J Cardiol 54[Suppl]:S165-S171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reid JR, Morrison SC, DiFiore JW (2002) Thoracic outlet syndrome with subclavian aneurysm in a very young child: the complementary value of MRA and 3D-CT in diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 32:22–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegel MJ (2003) Multiplanar and three-dimensional multi-detector row CT of thoracic vessels and airways in the pediatric population. Radiology 229:641–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long FR, Castile RG, Brody AS, et al (1999) Lungs in infants and young children: improved thin-section CT with a noninvasive controlled-ventilation technique—initial experience. Radiology 212:588–593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force (1996) Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 84:459–471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (1995) Comprehensive accreditation manuals for hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace, IllGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siegel MJ (1999) Practical CT techniques. Pediatric body CT. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen RA, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2000) Data acquisition for pediatric CT angiography: problems and solutions. Pediatr Radiol 30:813–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Napel S (2003) Basic principles of MDCT. In: Fishman EK, Jeffrey RB (eds) Multidetector CT: principles, techniques, and clinical applications. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 3–13Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA, et al (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:13761–13766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pages J, Buls N, Osteaux M (2003) CT doses in children: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol 76:803–811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    1990 Recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (1990) ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP21. No. 1–3. The International Commission on Radiological Protection, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nickoloff EL, Dutta AK, Lu ZF (2003) Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. Med Phys 30:395–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26:2248–2253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katz M, Konen E, Rozenman J, et al (1995) Spiral CT and 3-D image reconstruction of vascular rings and associated tracheobronchial anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:564–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Westra SJ, Hill JA, Alejos JC, et al (1999) Three-dimensional helical CT of pulmonary arteries in infants and children with congenital heart disease. AJR 173:109–115Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fishman EK (1997) High-resolution three-dimensional imaging from subsecond helical CT data sets: applications in vascular imaging. AJR 169:441–443Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rubin GD, Dake MD, Semba CP (1995) Current status of three-dimensional spiral CT scanning for imaging the vasculature. Radiol Clin North Am 33:51–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frush DP, Donnelly LF (1998) Helical CT in children: technical considerations and body applications. Radiology 209:37–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frush DP, Spencer EB, Donnelly LF, et al (1999) Optimizing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in infants and children using bolus tracking. AJR 172:1007–1013Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hopkins KL, Patrick LE, Simoneaux SF, et al (1996) Pediatric great vessel anomalies: initial clinical experience with spiral CT angiography. Radiology 200:811–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    de Virgilio C, Mercado PD, Arnell T, et al (1997) Noniatrogenic pediatric vascular trauma: a 10-year experience at a Level I trauma center. Am Surg 63:781–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Diamond S, Gaspard D, Katz S (2003) Vascular injuries to the extremities in a suburban trauma center. Am Surg 69:848–851PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Harris LM, Hordines J (2003) Major vascular injuries in the pediatric population. Ann Vasc Surg 17:266–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bhalla S, Menias CO, Heiken JP (2003) CT of acute abdominal aortic disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1153–1169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Coulam CH, Rubin GD (2001) Acute aortic abnormalities. Semin Roentgenol 36:148–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pyeritz RE (2000) The Marfan syndrome. Annu Rev Med 51:481–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Silverman DI, Burton KJ, Gray J, et al (1995) Life expectancy in the Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol 75:157–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mattar SG, Kumar AG, Lumsden AB (1994) Vascular complications in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Am Surg 60:827–831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morris CA (1998) Genetic aspects of supravalvular aortic stenosis. Curr Opin Cardiol 13:214–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jost CJ, Gloviczki P, Edwards WD, et al (2001) Aortic aneurysms in children and young adults with tuberous sclerosis: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 33:639–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Daniels SR, Loggie JM, McEnery PT, et al (1987) Clinical spectrum of intrinsic renovascular hypertension in children. Pediatrics 80:698–704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hamilton SJ, Friedman JM (2000) Insights into the pathogenesis of Neurofibromatosis 1 vasculopathy. Clin Genet 58:341–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chew DK, Muto PM, Gordon JK, et al (2001) Spontaneous aortic dissection and rupture in a patient with neurofibromatosis. J Vasc Surg 34:364–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Limbacher JP, Hill ME, Janicki PC (1979) Hypoplasia of the abdominal aorta associated with rubella syndrome. South Med J 72:617–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baskerville PA, Ackroyd JS, Lea TM, et al (1985) The Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome: clinical, radiological and haemodynamic features and management. Br J Surg 72:232–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gloviczki P, Stanson AW, Stickler GB, et al (1991) Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome: the risks and benefits of vascular interventions. Surgery 110:469–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    James CA, Allison JW, Waner M (1999) Pediatric case of the day. Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Radiographics 19:1093–1096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Norgard G, Berg A (2003) Isomerism (Heterotaxia). In: Gatzoulis MA, Webb GD, Daubeney PEF (eds) Diagnosis and management of adult congenital heart disease. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 413–424Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schwartz YM, Berkowitz D, Lorber A (1999) Transvenous coil embolization of a patent ductus venosus in a 2-month-old child. Pediatrics 103:1045–1047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Marx M, Huber WD, Crone J, et al (2001) Interventional stent implantation in a child with patent ductus venosus and pulmonary hypertension. Eur J Pediatr 160:501–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rooks VJ, Lebowitz RL (2001) Extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction from a crossing renal vessel: demography and imaging. Pediatr Radiol 31:120–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Perlberg S, Pfau A (1984) Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction associated with lower polar vessels. Urology 23:13–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Herts BR (1998) Helical CT and CT angiography for the identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction. Urol Clin North Am 25:259–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lie JT (1994) Nomenclature and classification of vasculitis: plus ca change, plus c‘est la meme chose. Arthritis Rheum 37:181–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Athreya BH (1995) Vasculitis in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 42:1239–1261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hayashi K, Fukushima T, Matsunaga N, et al (1986) Takayasu’s arteritis: decrease in aortic wall thickening following steroid therapy, documented by CT. Br J Radiol 59:281–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Park JH, Chung JW, Im JG, et al (1995) Takayasu arteritis: evaluation of mural changes in the aorta and pulmonary artery with CT angiography. Radiology 196:89–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    McCulloch M, Andronikou S, Goddard E, et al (2003) Angiographic features of 26 children with Takayasu’s arteritis. Pediatr Radiol 33:230–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Begelman SM, Olin JW (2000) Fibromuscular dysplasia. Curr Opin Rheumatol 12:41–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sandmann W, Schulte KM (2000) Multivisceral fibromuscular dysplasia in childhood: case report and review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 14:496–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chun YS, Cherry KJ (2003) Radiation arteritis. J Am Coll Surg 196:482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fajardo LF, Berthrong M (1988) Vascular lesions following radiation. Pathol Annu 23 Pt 1:297–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Cheng YF, Chen CL, Jawan B, et al (2003) Multislice computed tomography angiography in pediatric liver transplantation. Transplantation 76:353–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lee SS, Kim TK, Byun JH, et al (2003) Hepatic arteries in potential donors for living related liver transplantation: evaluation with multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 227:391–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Janoff DM, Davol P, Hazzard J, et al (2004) Computerized tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction for the evaluation of renal size and arterial anatomy in the living kidney donor. J Urol 171:27–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hofmann LV, Smith PA, Kuszyk BS, et al (1999) Three-dimensional helical CT angiography in renal transplant recipients: a new problem-solving tool. AJR 173:1085–1089Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Katyal S, Oliver JH III, Buck DG, et al (2000) Detection of vascular complications after liver transplantation: early experience in multislice CT angiography with volume rendering. AJR 175:1735–1739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fidler JL, Cheatham JP, Fletcher SE, et al (2000) CT angiography of complications in pediatric patients treated with intravascular stents. AJR 174:355–359Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations