Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts
- 820 Downloads
A congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CEPS) is uncommon. A type 1 CEPS exists where there is absence of intrahepatic portal venous supply and a type 2 CEPS where this supply is preserved. The diagnosis of congenital portosystemic shunt is important because it may cause hepatic encephalopathy.
To describe the clinical and imaging features of three children with CEPS and to review the cases in the published literature.
Materials and methods
The diagnostic imaging and medical records for three children with CEPS were retrieved and evaluated. An extensive literature search was performed.
Including our cases, there are 61 reported cases of CEPS, 39 type 1 and 22 type 2. Type 1 occurs predominantly in females, while type 2 shows no significant sexual preponderance. The age at diagnosis ranges from 31 weeks of intrauterine life to 76 years. Both types of CEPS have a number of associations, the most common being nodular lesions of the liver (n=25), cardiac anomalies (n=19), portosystemic encephalopathy (n=10), polysplenia (n=9), biliary atresia (n=7), skeletal anomalies (n=5), and renal tract anomalies (n=4).
MRI is recommended as an important means of diagnosing and classifying cases of CEPS and examining the associated cardiovascular and hepatic abnormalities. Screening for CEPS in patients born with polysplenia is suggested.
KeywordsCongenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt Magnetic resonance imaging Hepatic nodular hyperplasia Polysplenia Left isomerism
- 6.Abernethy J (1793) Account of two instances of the uncommon formation of the viscera in the human body. Phil Trans B83:59–66Google Scholar
- 14.Ikeda S, Sera Y, Ohshiro H, et al (1999) Surgical indications for patents with hyperammonemia. J Ped Surg 34:1012–1015Google Scholar
- 17.Okuda Y, Ono M, Kato N, et al (1988) Congenital absence of the portal vein in a 17-year-old woman. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 48:86Google Scholar
- 26.Hellweg G (1954) Congenital absence of intrahepatic portal venous system simulating Eck fistula. Report of a case with necropsy findings. AMA Arch Path 57:425–430Google Scholar
- 27.Shah R, Ford EG, Woolley MM (1992) Congenital portocaval shunt. Case report. Pediatr Surg Int 7:216–217Google Scholar
- 31.Kerlan RK, Sollenberger RD, Palubinskas AJ, et al (1982) Portal-systemic encephalopathy due to a congenital portocaval shunt. Am J Roentgenol 139:1013–1015Google Scholar
- 36.Kiernan F (1833) The anatomy and physiology of the liver. Phil Trans R Soc 113:711–760Google Scholar
- 42.Ewing GO, Suter PF, Bailey CS (1984) Hepatic insufficiency associated with congenital anomalies of the portal vein in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 10:463–476Google Scholar
- 44.Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Furth EE, et al (1995) MR imaging of hepatic nodular regenerative hyperplasia. J Mag Reson Imaging 5:730–732Google Scholar
- 45.Moore KL (1988) The developing human. Saunders, Toronto, pp 221–308Google Scholar