Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 272–279 | Cite as

Effective doses to adult and pediatric patients

  • Walter HudaEmail author
Session II: Dosimetry


Radiation Dose Organ Dose Minimize Radiation Dose Patient Mass Entrance Skin Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reading list

  1. 1.
    Junk AG, Jessen KA, Hansen J (1977) Image quality and dose in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 7: 77–81Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rothenberg LN, Pentlow KS (1992) Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics 12: 1225–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hidajat N, Felix R (1998) Physical dose quantities in computed tomography - how effective for describing the patient dose and the radiation risk? Radiat Protect Dosimetry 80: 171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seeram E (1999) Radiation dose in computed tomography. Radiol Technol 70: 534–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huda W, Chamberlain CC, Rosenbaum AE, et al (2001) Radiation doses to infants and adults undergoing head CT examinations. Med Phys 28: 393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mini RL, Vock P, Mury R, et al (1995) Radiation exposure of patients who undergo CT of the trunk. Radiology 195: 557–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caon M, Bibbo G, Pattison J (1999) An EGS4-ready tomographic computational model of a 14-year-old female torso for calculating organ doses from CT examinations. Phys Med Biol 44: 2213–2225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huda W, Scaizetti EM, Roskopf M (2000) Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations. Med Phys 27: 838–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atherton JV, Huda W (1996) Energy imparted and effective doses in computed tomography. Med Phys 23: 735–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, et al (1999) Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology 210: 645–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lucaya J, Piqueras J, Garcia-Pefia P, et al (2000) Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR 175: 985–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vade A, Demos TC, Olson MC, et al (1996) Evaluation of image quality using 1:1 pitch and 1.5:1 pitch helical CT in children: a comparative study. Pediatr Radiol 26: 891–893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 176: 297–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berland LL, Smith JK (1998) Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 209: 327–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rogers LF. (2001) Taking care of children: check out the parameters used for helical CT. AJR 176: 287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vade A, Olson MC, Vittore CP, et al (1999) Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using Smart Prep monitoring for 2:1 pitch helical scanning. Pediatr Radiol 29: 689–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robinson AE, Hill EP, Harpen MD (1986) Radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT. Pediatr Radiol 16: 53–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radiological PhysicsState University at New York HSCSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations