Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 834–840 | Cite as

Standardization of a Continuous Ramp Ergometer Protocol for Clinical Exercise Testing in Children

  • Jenna M. Octavio
  • Amanda L. Folk
  • Lauren Falini
  • Sherlly Xie
  • Brett W. Goudie
  • Samuel S. Gidding
  • Bradley W. RobinsonEmail author
Original Article
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Developing a standardized protocol for pediatric exercise laboratories is challenging. Our objective was to report normal pediatric values for a continuous non-steady state cycle ergometer ramp protocol to achieve 8–10 min of exercise based on sex and weight. One hundred seventeen patients (117) [mean age 13 ± 2.8 years, range 7–18 years (51% male)] referred for chest pain with normal cardiac evaluation underwent cardiopulmonary testing on a cycle ergometer. Patients entered one of the four continuous ramp protocols (10, 15, 20, and 25 W/min ramp) to achieve an expected peak workload of 3 W/kg at an increase of 0.3 to 0.35 W/kg/min. Exercise test outcomes measured included duration, peak heart rate, work, respiratory exchange ratio, peak oxygen consumption, peak blood pressure, and ventilatory anaerobic threshold. An exercise duration of 8–10 min was achieved in a majority of the study population; however, interactions with age (older, longer duration) and sex (males, longer duration) were present. Using our algorithm (0.3–0.35 W/kg × weight), we demonstrated four non-steady state ramp bike ergometer protocols (10, 15, 20, and 25 W/min) that can be applied to males and females of different ages and weights to achieve an exercise duration of 8–10 min.

Keywords

Bike ergometer normal values Cardiopulmonary exercise Exercise normal values in children Normal pediatric values 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Casabur R, Whipp B (1999) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation: including pathophysiology and clinical applications, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paridon S, Alpert BS, Boas SR, Cabrera ME, Caldarera LL, Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Knilans TK, Nixon PA, Rhodes J, Yetman AT, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth (2006) Clinical stress testing in the pediatric age group: a statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in youth. Circulation 113:1905–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rowland TW (1993) Aerobic exercise testing protocols. In: Rowland TW (ed) Pediatric laboratory exercise testing: clinical guidelines. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 19–41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tomassoni TL (1993) Conducting the pediatric exercise test. In: Rowland TW (ed) Pediatric laboratory exercise testing: clinical guidelines. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blais S, Berbari J, Counil FP, Dallaire F (2015) A systematic review of reference values in pediatric cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Pediatr Cardiol 36:1553–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper DM, Weiler-Ravell D, Whipp BJ, Wasserman K (1984) Aerobic parameters of exercise as a function of body size during growth in children. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 56:628–634Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Godfrey S, Davies CT, Wozniak E, Barnes CA (1971) Cardio-respiratory response to exercise in normal children. Clin Sci 40(5):419–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tanner CS, Heise CT, Barber G (1991) Correlation of the physiologic parameters of a continuous ramp versus an incremental James exercise protocol in normal children. Am J Cardiol 67:309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ten Harkel ADJ, Takken T, Van Osch-Gevers M, Helbing WA (2011) Normal values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in children. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 18:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marshall WQ (1978) Puberty. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM (eds) Human growth, vol 2. Plenum, New York, pp 141–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J, ATS/ERS Task Force (2005) Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 26:319–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petzl DH, Haber P, Schuster E, Popow C, Haschke F (1988) Reliability of estimation of maximum performance capacity on the basis of submaximum ergometric stress tests in children 10–14 years old. Eur J Pediatr 147:174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brooks GA, Fahey TD, Baldwin KM (1984) Sex difference in physical performance. In: Brooks GA, Fahey TD (eds) Exercise physiology: human bioenergetics and its applications, 1st edn. Wiley, New York, pp 637–659Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ (1986) A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 60:2020–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention (n.d.) Body mass index: considerations for practitioners. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/BMIforPactitioners.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2017
  16. 16.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Clinical growth charts. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/clinical_charts.htm. Accessed 14 Sep 2017
  17. 17.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM (2010) Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA 303:242–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. Accessed 20 Sep 2016
  19. 19.
    Freedson PS, Goodman TL (1993) Measurement of oxygen consumption. In: Rowland TW (ed) Pediatric laboratory exercise testing: clinical guidelines. Human Kinetics, Champaign, p 107Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alpert BS, Flood NL, Strong WB, Dover EV, DuRant RH, Martin AM, Booker DL (1982) Responses to ergometer exercise in a healthy biracial population of children. J Pediatr 101:538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nemours Cardiac CenterNemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for ChildrenWilmingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Weight ManagementNemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for ChildrenWilmingtonUSA
  4. 4.Nemours Biomedical ResearchNemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for ChildrenWilmingtonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Kinesiology and Applied PhysiologyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  6. 6.Pediatric Heart CenterHasbro Children’s HospitalProvidenceUSA
  7. 7.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations