Atrioventricular Septal Defect (AVSD) is a rare congenital heart defect (CHD) often associated with genetic syndromes, most commonly Down syndrome (DS). Over the last four decades, surgical repair has increased survival and improved quality of life in these patients. The prevalence of bradyarrhythmias namely, atrioventricular block (AVB) and sinus node dysfunction (SND) in AVSD is partially known. 522 cases with both partial and complete AVSD (38.7% with DS), undergoing intracardiac repair from 1982 to 2016 at our institution, were reviewed from our system database. 38 (7.3%) patients received permanent PM implantation for AVB (early or late) or SND. On one hand, AVB requiring PM was found in 26 (4.98%). This was further subdivided into early-onset 14 (2.6%) and late-onset AVB 12 (2.2%) (median 4 [IQR 1–7] years). On the other hand, 12 (2.3%) experienced late SND requiring PM (median 11 [IQR 3.5–15.2] years). Early and late AVB were independent from the type of AVSD (partial or complete), whereas the late SND was remarkably observed in complete AVSD compared to partial AVSD (p = 0.017). We classified the cohort into two main categories: DS (202, 38.7%) and non-DS (320, 61.3%). At Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, DS was significantly associated with late-onset bradyarrhythmias (p = 0.024). At Cox regression analysis, we identified DS as an independent predictor of PM implantation (HR 2.17). In conclusion, about 7% of repaired AVSD patients need PM implantation during follow-up. There are no differences in early and late AVB occurrence according to the type of AVSD. There is a higher incidence of late SND in repaired complete AVSD, with a later timing onset in patients with associated DS. Moreover, DS seems to be an independent predictor of PM implantation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Elisa Del Vecchio for her valuable collaboration in the editorial revision.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Calkoen EE, Hazekamp MG, Blom NA et al (2016) Atrioventricular septal defect: from embryonic development to long-term follow-up. Int J Cardiol 202:784–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen N, Andersen H, Garne E et al (2013) Atrioventricular septal defects among infants in Europe: a population-based study of prevalence, associated anomalies, and survival. Cardiol Young 23:560–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillehei CW, Sellers RD, Bonnabeau RC, Eliot RS (1963) Chronic postsurgical complete heart block. With particular reference to prognosis, management, and a new P-wave pacemaker. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46:436–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bonatti V, Agnetti A, Squarcia U (1998) Early and late postoperative complete heart block in pediatric patients submitted to open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Med Chir 20:181–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gross GJ, Chiu CC, Hamilton RM, Kirsh JA, Stephenson EA (2006) Natural history of postoperative heart block in congenital heart disease: implications for pacing intervention. Heart Rhythm 3:601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson JB, Czosek RJ, Knilans TK, Meganathan K, Heaton P (2012) Postoperative heart block in children with common forms of congenital heart disease: results from the KID database. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23:1349–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weindling SN, Saul JP, Gamble WJ, Mayer JE, Wessel D, Walsh EP (1998) Duration of complete atrioventricular block after congenital heart disease surgery. Am J Cardiol 82:525–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurens P, Gavelle P, Piwnica A, Farge C, Dubost C, Maurice P (1983) Severe postoperative heart blocks appearing late. 16 cases. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 76:1132–1139PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nishimura RA, Callahan MJ, Holmes DR Jr et al (1984) Transient atrioventricular block after open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 53:198–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godman MJ, Roberts NK, Izukawa T (1974) Late postoperative conduction disturbances after repair of ventricular septal defect and tetralogy of Fallot. Analysis by his bundle recordings. Circulation 49:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss AJ, Klyman G, Emmanouilides GC (1972) Late onset complete heart block. Newly recognized sequela of cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 30:884–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks MA, Jenson J, Kugler JD (2001) Late development of atrioventricular block after congenital heart surgery in Down syndrome. Am J Cardiol 88:A7:86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange R, Guenther T, Busch R, Hess J, Schreiber C (2007) The presence of Down syndrome is not a risk factor in complete atrioventricular septal defect repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Hay AA, MacNeill SJ, Yacoub M, Shore DF, Shinebourne EA (2003) Complete atrioventricular septal defect, Down syndrome, and surgical outcome: risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg 75:412–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffirio C, Marino B, Formigari R (2008) Better surgical prognosis for patients with Down syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroud JM, Jacobs JP, Spicer D et al (2010) Report from the international society for nomenclature of paediatric and congenital heart disease: creation of a visual encyclopedia illustrating the terms and definitions of the international pediatric and congenital cardiac code. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 1:300–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formigari R, Michielon G, Digilio MC et al (2009) Genetic syndromes and congenital heart defects: how is surgical management affected? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:606–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu MC, Dickerson HA, Moore JA et al (2018) Heterotaxy syndrome and associated arrhythmias in pediatric patients. Heart Rhythm 15:548–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines/North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines et al (2002) ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). Circulation 106:2145–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Heart Rhythm Society et al (2013) 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 127:e283–e352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batra AS, Wells WJ, Hinoki KW, Stanton RA, Silka MJ (2003) Late recovery of atrioventricular conduction after pacemaker implantation for complete heart block associated with surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:1291–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman L, Pass RH, Hordof AJ, Spotnitz HM (2008) Late onset of heart block after open heart surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 29:56–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Europace 15:1070–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman BS, Williams WG, Hill T et al (1985) Permanent cardiac pacing after open heart surgery: congenital heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 8:732–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexi-Meskishvili V, Ishino K, Dähnert I et al (1996) Correction of complete atrioventricular septal defects with the double-patch technique and cleft closure. Ann Thorac Surg 62:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin PJ, Backer CL, Eltayeb O, Mongé MC, Hauck AL, Costello JM (2016) Repair of partial atrioventricular septal defect: age and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 102:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Louis JD, Jodhka U, Jacobs JP et al (2014) Contemporary outcomes of complete atrioventricular septal defect repair: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148:2526–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker EM, Pyles LA, Bass JL, Moller JH (2007) Permanent pacemaker for atrioventricular conduction block after operative repair of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1196–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray LE, Smith AH, Flack EC, Crum K, Owen J, Kannankeril PJ (2017) Genotypic and phenotypic predictors of complete heart block and recovery of conduction after surgical repair of congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm 14:402–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris CD, Magilke D, Reller M (1992) Down’s syndrome affects results of surgical correction of complete atrioventricular canal. Pediatr Cardiol 13:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom NA, Ottenkamp J, Deruiter MC, Wenink ACG, Gittenberger-De Groot AC (2005) Development of the cardiac conduction system in atrioventricular septal defect in human trisomy 21. Pediatr Res 58:516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar