Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 798–802 | Cite as

Measurement of Oxygen Consumption in Children Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization: Comparison Between Mass Spectrometry and the Breath-by-Breath Method

  • Long Guo
  • Yong Cui
  • Scott Pharis
  • Mark Walsh
  • Joseph Atallah
  • Meng-Wei Tan
  • Jennifer Rutledge
  • J. Y. Coe
  • Ian Adatia
Original Article

Abstract

Accurate measurement of oxygen consumption (VO2) is important to precise calculation of blood flow using the Fick equation. This study aimed to validate the breath-by-breath method (BBBM) of measuring oxygen consumption VO2 compared with respiratory mass spectroscopy (MS) for intubated children during cardiac catheterization. The study used MS and BBBM to measure VO2 continuously and simultaneously for 10 min in consecutive anesthetized children undergoing cardiac catheterization who were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube, ventilated mechanically, and hemodynamically stable, with normal body temperature. From 26 patients, 520 data points were obtained. The mean VO2 was 94.5 ml/min (95 % confidence interval [CI] 65.7–123.3 ml/min) as measured by MS and 91.4 ml/min (95 % CI 64.9–117.9 ml/min) as measured by BBBM. The mean difference in VO2 measurements between MS and BBBM (3.1 ml/min; 95 % CI −1.7 to +7.9 ml/min) was not significant (p = 0.19). The MS and BBBM VO2 measurements were highly correlated (R 2 = 0.98; P < 0.0001). Bland–Altman analysis showed good correspondence between MS and BBBM, with a mean difference of −3.01 and 95 % limits of agreement ranging from −26.2 to +20.0. The mean VO2 indexed to body surface area did not differ significantly between MS and BBBM (3.4 ml/min m2; 95 % CI −1.4 to 8.2; p = 0.162). The mean difference and limits of agreement were −3.8 ml/min m2 (range, −19.9 to 26.7). Both MS and BBBM may be used to measure VO2 in anesthetized intubated children undergoing cardiac catheterization. The two methods demonstrated excellent agreement. However, BBBM may be more suited to clinical use with children.

Keywords

Pediatric Oxygen consumption Innocor™ Mass spectrometry Cardiac catheterization Fick 

Abbreviations

BBBM

Breath-by-breath method (InnocorTM)

CI

Confidence interval

FiO2

Fraction of inspired oxygen concentration

IQR

Interquartile range

MS

Respiratory mass spectroscopy

SPSS

Statistical package for the social sciences

VO2

Oxygen consumption

ml

Milliliters

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by a Grant from the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute, Edmonton, Alberta.

References

  1. 1.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carter J, Jeukendrup AE (2002) Validity and reliability of three commercially available breath-by-breath respiratory systems. Eur J Appl Physiol 86:435–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Williams RH et al (1989) Underestimation of cardiac output by thermodilution in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Am J Med 86:417–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies NJ, Denison DM (1979) The measurement of metabolic gas exchange and minute volume by mass spectrometry alone. Respir Physiol 36:261–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammarlund K (1984) Measurement of oxygen consumption in preterm infants: assessment of a method using a mass spectrometer. Clin Physiol 4:519–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hillis LD, Firth BG, Winniford MD (1985) Analysis of factors affecting the variability of Fick versus indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 56:764–768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoeper MM, Maier R, Tongers J et al (1999) Determination of cardiac output by the Fick method, thermodilution, and acetylene rebreathing in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:535–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li J, Bush A, Schulze-Neick I et al (2003) Measured versus estimated oxygen consumption in ventilated patients with congenital heart disease: the validity of predictive equations. Crit Care Med 31:1235–1240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lundell BP, Casas ML, Wallgren CG (1996) Oxygen consumption in infants and children during heart catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 17:207–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nishikawa T, Dohi S (1993) Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth 40:142–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reybrouck T, Deroost F, Van der Hauwaert LG (1992) Evaluation of breath-by-breath measurement of respiratory gas exchange in pediatric exercise testing. Chest 102:147–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmitz A, Kretschmar O, Knirsch W et al (2008) Comparison of calculated with measured oxygen consumption in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 29:1054–1058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shekerdemian L, Shore D, Lincoln C et al (1996) Negative-pressure ventilation improves cardiac output after right heart surgery. Circulation 94:II-49–II-55Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sodal IE (1989) The medical mass spectrometer. Biomed Instrum Technol 23:469–476PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Long Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yong Cui
    • 2
    • 3
  • Scott Pharis
    • 1
  • Mark Walsh
    • 1
  • Joseph Atallah
    • 1
  • Meng-Wei Tan
    • 3
  • Jennifer Rutledge
    • 1
  • J. Y. Coe
    • 1
  • Ian Adatia
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Pediatric Cardiology, Stollery Children’s Hospital, Mazankowski Alberta Heart InstituteUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care, Stollery Children’s Hospital, Mazankowski Alberta Heart InstituteUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Changhai HospitalSecond Military Medical UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Stollery Children’s Hospital, Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences CenterUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations