Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 606–611 | Cite as

Population-Based Treated Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease in a Pediatric Cohort

  • C. Osborne Shuler
  • George B. Black
  • Jeanette M. JerrellEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Extant epidemiologic results for pediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) are dated. Given the degree of variability in previous prevalence estimates and the rapid changes in pediatric cardiology diagnostic and treatment procedures, a reexamination of these rates represents a potentially important update in this area of inquiry. This report characterizes the prevalence rates of children with CHD in one state’s treated pediatric population by type of lesion and in comparison with published rates from previous studies. Two 15-year data sets (1996–2010) are analyzed. The inclusion criteria for the study required the participants to be 17 years or younger, enrollees in the South Carolina State Medicaid or State Health Plan, and recipients of a CHD diagnosis on one or more service visits to a pediatrician or pediatric cardiologist. A 15-year accrued prevalence rate for pediatric CHD of 16.7 per 1,000 was found among 1,145,364 unduplicated children served. The annual incidence rates varied from 6.3 to 8.6 per 1,000, with an initial downward trend from 1996 to 2002 followed by an upward trend from 2003 to 2008. A higher prevalence of atrioventricular canal/endocardial cushion defects, common/single ventricle, double-outlet right ventricle, tetralogy of Fallot, and truncus arteriosus and a lower prevalence of dextro-transposition of the great arteries were diagnosed in South Carolina than in other states and countries according to published results. The study results underscore the need for periodic updating of prevalence data for pediatric CHD, both in total and for specific lesions, to anticipate and provide more specialized care to young patients with CHD, especially in the more rare and complex cases.

Keywords

Congenital heart disease Prevalence rates Severe lesions Common lesions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided through a Clinical Incentive Research Grant from the University of South Carolina Provost’s Office.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Baltaxe E, Zarante I (2006) Prevalence of congenital heart disease in 44,985 newborns in Colombia. Arch Cardiol Mex 76:263–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein, D (2011) Chapter 418: epidemiology and genetic basis of congenital heart disease. In: Kleigman RM (ed) Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 19th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia. http://www.mdconsult.com. Accessed 29 Sept 2011
  3. 3.
    Botto LD, Correa A, Erickson JD (2001) Racial and temporal variations in the prevalence of heart defects. Pediatrics 107(3):E32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calzolari E, Garani G, Cocchi G et al (2003) IMER Working Group Congenital heart defects: 15 years of experience of the Emilia-Romagna Registry (Italy). Eur J Epidemiol 18(8):773–780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlgren LE, Ericson A, Källèn B (1987) Monitoring of congenital cardiac defects. Pediatr Cardiol 8:247–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Connelly MS, Webb GD, Somerville J et al (1998) Canadian Consensus Conference on adult Congenital heart disease 1996. Can J Cardiol 14:395–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferencz C, Rubin JD, McCarter RJ et al (1985) Congenital heart disease: prevalence at live-birth. The Baltimore–Washington Infant Study. Am J Epidemiol 121:31–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grabitz RG, Joffres MR, Collins-Nakai RL (1988) Congenital heart disease: incidence in the first year of life. The Alberta Heritage Pediatric Cardiology Program. Am J Epidemiol 128(2):381–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffman JI, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(12):1890–1900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meberg A, Otterstad JE, Froland G, Lindberg H, Sarland SJ (2000) Outcome of congenital heart defects: a population-based study. Acta Pediatr 89:1344–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell SC, Korones SB, Berendes HW (1971) Congenital heart disease in 56,109 births: incidence and natural history. Circulation 43:323–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pradat P (1992) Epidemiology of major congenital heart defects in Sweden, 1981–1986. J Epidemiol Community Health 46(3):211–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pradat P, Francannet C, Harris JA, Robert E (2003) The epidemiology of cardiovascular defects: part I. A study based on data from three large registries of congenital malformations. Pediatr Cardiol 24(3):195–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Bom T, Zomer AC, Zwinderman AH et al (2011) The changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 8(1):50–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson PD, Correa-Villaseñor A, Loffredo CA, Ferencz C (1993) Temporal trends in prevalence of cardiovascular malformations in Maryland and the District of Columbia, 1981–1988. The Baltimore–Washington Infant Study Group. Epidemiology 4(3):259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wren C, O’Sullivan JJ (2001) Survival with congenital heart disease and need for follow up in adult life. Heart 85:438–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khawaja K (2008) Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 93(1):F33–F35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Osborne Shuler
    • 1
  • George B. Black
    • 1
  • Jeanette M. Jerrell
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsUniversity of South Carolina School of MedicineColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral ScienceUniversity of South Carolina School of MedicineColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations