Dual-Axis Rotational Coronary Angiography: A New Technique for Detecting Graft Coronary Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients
- 211 Downloads
Annual surveillance coronary angiograpyhy to screen for graft coronary vasculopathy is routine practice after orthotopic heart transplantation. Traditionally, this is performed with direct coronary angiography using static single-plane or biplane angiography. Recently, technological advances have made it possible to perform dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (RA). This technique differs from standard static single-plane or biplane angiography in that a single detector is preprogrammed to swing through a complex 80° arc during a single injection. It has the advantage of providing a perspective of the vessels from a full arc of images rather than from one or two static images per contrast injection. The current study evaluated two coronary angiography techniques used consecutively at a single center to evaluate pediatric heart transplant recipients for graft coronary vasculopathy. A total of 23 patients underwent routine coronary angiography using both biplane static coronary angiography (BiP) and RA techniques at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin from February 2009 to September 2010. Demographic and procedure data were collected from each procedure and analyzed for significance utilizing a Wilcoxon rank sum test. No significant demographic or procedural differences between the BiP and the RA procedures were noted. Specific measures of radiation dose including fluoroscopy time and dose area product were similar among the imaging techniques. The findings show that RA can be performed safely and reproducibly in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Compared with standard BiP, RA does not increase radiation exposure or contrast use and in our experience has provided superior angiographic imaging for the evaluation of graft coronary vasculopathy.
KeywordsCoronary angiography Graft vasculopathy Heart transplantation
The authors thank Pippa Simpson, Ph.D., and Yumi Cao, M.S., for their statistical assistance.
- 3.Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, van den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD (2009) Rotational versus standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:753–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Garcia JA, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Klein AJ, Carroll JD (2007) Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:190–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Garcia JA, Movassaghi B, Casserly IP, Klein AJ, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Hansgen A, Wink O, Groves BM, Carroll JD (2009) Determination of optimal viewing regions for x-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:455–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kirk R, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Benden C, Christie JD, Dobbels F, Rahmel AO, Stehlik J, Hertz MI (2011) The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: fourteenth pediatric heart transplantation Report–2011. J Heart Lung Transplant 30:1095–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD (2004) Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:167–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar