Qualitative Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Regurgitation with Quantitative Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: A Comparative Study
This study examined the correlation of echocardiography (ECHO) and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) in the assessment of aortic valve regurgitation (AR) in children and young adults with congenital heart disease. We hypothesized that qualitative ECHO assessment correlates insufficiently with quantitative CMR data and compared subjective ECHO evaluations with objective measurement of regurgitant fractions (RF) by CMR. Patients who had both ECHO and CMR assessments of AR within 60 days of each other were included. The qualitative ECHO assessment (mild, moderate, severe) of AR and left ventricular dimension at end diastole were recorded. RF was quantified by CMR using phase-contrast velocity mapping. Repeat ECHO review and grading of AR was performed by a blinded single reader in a randomly chosen subgroup of patients. In 43 patients studied, statistical significance was observed in the CMR-RF between mild and moderate, and between mild and severe ECHO grades. There was significant overlap of objective RF between subjective grades. Mild ECHO AR corresponded to an RF (%) of 0–29, moderate 1–40, and severe 5–58. Overlap was more significant at moderate and severe grades. Results were similar in the group in whom a single reader interpreted the ECHO assessment. In conclusion, results derived from a real-life multiple-reader ECHO laboratory showed inconsistencies in ECHO grading of AR, with a wide range of objectively measured RF within a given ECHO grade. ECHO is less reliable in identifying more severe AR, often overestimating severity. Quantitative CMR is a potentially useful supplement to ECHO for management decisions and assessments of medical and surgical therapies in children and young adults with AR.
KeywordsAdult congenital heart disease Aortic valve regurgitation Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging Echocardiography Pediatric cardiology
- 3.Gelfand EV, Hughes S, Hauser TH, Yeon SB, Goepfert L, Kissinger KV, Rofsky NM, Manning WJ (2006) Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 8:503–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Li W, Davlouros PA, Kilner PJ, Pennell DJ, Gibson D, Henein MY, Gatzoulis MA (2004) Doppler-echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary regurgitation in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 147:165–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Miyake Y, Hozumi T, Mori I, Sugioka K, Yamamuro A, Akasaka T, Homma S, Yoshida K, Yoshikawa J (2002) Automated quantification of aortic regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction using the digital colour Doppler velocity profile integration method in patients with aortic regurgitation. Heart 88:481–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Pflugfelder PW, Landzberg JS, Cassidy MM, Cheitlin MD, Schiller NB, Auffermann W, Higgins CB (1989) Comparison of cine MR imaging with Doppler echocardiography for the evaluation of aortic regurgitation. Am J Roentgenol 152:729–735Google Scholar
- 19.Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, Mayo J, Caputo G, O’Sullivan M, Parmley WW, Chatterjee K, Wolfe C, Higgins CB (1990) Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle. Am Heart J 119:1367–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar