Frequency and Indications for Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy After Congenital Heart Surgery
- 188 Downloads
Patients undergoing congenital heart surgery may occasionally require additional surgical procedures in the form of tracheostomy and gastrostomy. These procedures are often performed in an attempt to diminish hospital morbidity and length of stay. We reviewed the Web-based medical records of all patients undergoing congenital heart surgery at Miami Children’s Hospital from February 2002 through August 2007. Patients who were deemed preterm and had undergone closure of a patent ductus arteriosis were eliminated. The records of all other patients were queried for the terms gastrostomy, g-tube, Nissan, fundal plication, tracheostomy, or tracheotomy. Patients’ medical records in which these terms appeared in any portion were completely reviewed. There were 1660 congenital heart operations performed in the study period. There were 592 operations performed on patients whose age ranged from 1 month to 1 year and 441 neonatal operations. Mortality was 2%. Median postoperative stay was 8 days (range, 1–191 days), 12 days for neonates (range, 3–142 days), and 19 days for neonates undergoing RACHS-1 category 6 operations (range, 4–142 days). Tracheostomies were performed in four patients (0.2%). Gastrostomies were performed on eight patients (0.4%), representing 0.8% of patients <1 year of age, 1.4% of neonates, and 2.4% of patients undergoing RACHS-1 category 6 operations. The rate of patients undergoing either tracheostomy or gastrostomy after congenital heart surgery at our institution was quite low. Avoidance of either of these two procedures was achieved without increased morbidity or length of stay. The rate at which these procedures need to be performed may reflect the magnitude of the patients’ lifetime trauma related to their underlying condition and acute and total surgical experiences.
KeywordsHeart surgery Congenital Tracheostomy Gastrostomy Complications
The authors acknowledge the efforts of Lissette Cruz in manuscript preparation and submission to our hospital Institutional Review Board.
- 1.Ballweg JA, Dominguez TE, Ravishankar C, Kreutzer J, Marino BS, Bird GL, Gruber PJ, Wernovsky G, Gaynor JW, Nicolson SC, Spray TL, Tabbutt S (2007) A contemporary comparison of the effect of shunt type in hypoplastic left heart syndrome on the hemodynamics and outcome at stage 2 reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134(2):297–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cua CL, Thiagarajan RR, Gauvreau K, Lai L, Costello JM, Wessel DL, Del Nido PJ, Mayer JE Jr, Newburger JW, Laussen PC (2006) Early postoperative outcomes in a series of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome undergoing stage I palliation operation with either modified Blalock-Taussig shunt or right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 7(3):238–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.del Castillo SL, Moromisato DY, Dorey F, Ludwick J, Starnes VA, Wells WJ, Jeffries HE, Wong PC (2006) Mesenteric blood flow velocities in the newborn with single-ventricle physiology: modified Blalock-Taussig shunt versus right ventricle-pulmonary artery conduit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 7(2):132–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Harrison AM, Davis S, Reid JR, Morrison SC, Arrigain S, Connor JT, Temple ME (2005) Neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome have ultrasound evidence of abnormal superior mesenteric artery perfusion before and after the modified Norwood procedure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:445–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar