Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, 30:20 | Cite as

Screening Newborns for Congenital Heart Disease with Pulse Oximetry: Survey of Pediatric Cardiologists

  • Ruey-Kang R. Chang
  • Sandra Rodriguez
  • Thomas S. Klitzner
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Controversies exist regarding the use of pulse oximetry for routine screening of newborns. This study aimed to evaluate current practices and opinions of pediatric cardiologists in relation to newborn screening for congenital heart disease (CHD) using pulse oximetry.

Methods

Email invitations were sent to 1,045 pediatric cardiologists in North America. The survey was Internet based and included multiple-choice questions. Two repeat email reminders were sent after the initial invitation.

Results

A total of 363 responses (35%) were returned. In terms of experience, 40% of the respondents had more than 20 years, 32% had 10 to 20 years, 21% had 5 to 10 years, and 6% had less than 5 years of experience. More than 90% agreed that an early diagnosis of CHD for newborns prevents morbidity and mortality. In terms of practice, 96% reported that all newborns are examined by a clinician before discharge, 29% reported that newborns get a pulse oximetry reading, and 1.4% (n = 5) reported the use of electrocardiogram. Only 58% of respondents thought that current practice is adequate for detecting significant CHD. With regard to their experience with pulse oximetry, 26% reported “too many false-positives,” 21% described it as “prone to noise and artifact,” and 30% viewed it as “very operator dependent.” The overall support for mandated pulse oximetry screening was 55%. The support for mandate decreased with years of experience, with 76% of the supporters having less than 5 years, 58% of those having 5 to 10 years, 53% of those having 10 to 20 years, and 51% of those having more than 20 years of experience.

Conclusions

Pediatric cardiologists recognize that current practice is inadequate for detecting significant CHD. Slightly more than half of the pediatric cardiologists in this study supported a mandate for pulse oximetry screening, but there were many concerns, and the support decreased with increasing years of clinical experience.

Keywords

Heart disease Newborn Pulse oximetry Survey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Chang received research funding from the National Center for Research Resources, the National Institutes of Health (1 K23 RR17041-01) and the American Heart Association (0365041Y). Dr. Klitzner’s salary is supported in part by a grant from the Skirball Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Abu-Harb M, Wyllie J, Hey E et al (1994) Presentation of obstructive left heart malformations in infancy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 71:F179–F183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ainsworth S, Wyllie JP, Wren C (1999) Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiac murmurs in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 80:F43–F45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arlettaz R, Bauschatz AS, Monkhoff M et al (2006) The contribution of pulse oximetry to the early detection of congenital heart disease in newborns. Eur J Pediatr 165:94–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakr AF, Habib HS (2005) Combining pulse oximetry and clinical examination in screening for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 26:832–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartlett JM, Wypij D, Bellinger DC et al (2004) Effect of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes in D-transposition of the great arteries. Pediatrics 113:e335–e340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown KL, Ridout DA, Hoskote A et al (2006) Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates. Heart 92:1298–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang RK, Klitzner TS (2002) Can regionalization decrease the number of deaths for children who undergo cardiac surgery? A theoretical analysis. Pediatrics 109:173–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang RK, Rodriguez S, Lee M, Klitzner TS (2006) Risk factors for deaths occurring within 30 days and 1 year after hospital discharge for cardiac surgery among pediatric patients. Am Heart J 152:386–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Wahl Granelli A, Mellander M, Sunnegardh J et al (2005) Screening for duct-dependant congenital heart disease with pulse oximetry: a critical evaluation of strategies to maximize sensitivity. Acta Paediatr 94:1590–1596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fuchs IB, Muller H, Abdul-Khaliq H et al (2007) Immediate and long-term outcomes in children with prenatal diagnosis of selected isolated congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:38–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaskin PR, Owens SE, Talner NS et al (2000) Clinical auscultation skills in pediatric residents. Pediatrics 105:1184–1187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gnanalingham MG, Mehta BM, Siverajan M (2001) Pulse oximetry as a screening test in neonates. Arch Dis Child 84(Suppl 1):A35Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman JI, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1890–1900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoke TR, Donohue PK, Bawa PK et al (2002) Oxygen saturation as a screening test for critical congenital heart disease: a preliminary study. Pediatr Cardiol 23:403–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kishan J, Elzouki AY, Mir NA (1984) Coarctation of the aorta in the newborn: a clinical study. Ann Trop Paediatr 4:225–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knowles R, Griebsch I, Dezateux C et al (2005) Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 9:1–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koppel RI, Druschel CM, Carter T et al (2003) Effectiveness of pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatrics 111:451–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar RK, Newburger JW, Gauvreau K et al (1999) Comparison of outcome when hypoplastic left heart syndrome and transposition of the great arteries are diagnosed prenatally versus when diagnosis of these two conditions is made only postnatally. Am J Cardiol 83:1649–1653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liske MR, Greeley CS, Law DJ et al (2006) Report of the Tennessee task force on screening newborn infants for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 118:e1250–e1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahle WT, Clancy RR, McGaurn SP et al (2001) Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic morbidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 107:1277–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McMahon S, Iwamoto M, Massoudi M et al (2003) Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians. Pediatrics 111(4 pt 1):e299–e303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meberg A, Brun C (2005) Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants. XIX Nordic congress of perinatal medicine, Lund, Sweden, May 2005Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quinlan K (2000) An 8-day-old infant with poor perfusion and diaphoresis. J Emerg Nurs 26:85–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rajakumar K, Weisse M, Rosas A et al (1999) Comparative study of clinical evaluation of heart murmurs by general pediatricians and pediatric cardiologists. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 38:511–518Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reich JD, Miller S, Brogdon B et al (2003) The use of pulse oximetry to detect congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 142:268–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richmond S, Reay G, Abu Harb M (2002) Routine pulse oximetry in the asymptomatic newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 87:F83–F88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosati E, Chitano G, Dipaola L et al (2005) Indications and limitations for a neonatal pulse oximetry screening of critical congenital heart disease. J Perinat Med 33:455–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Satomi G, Yasukochi S, Shimizu T et al (1999) Has fetal echocardiography improved the prognosis of congenital heart disease? Comparison of patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome with and without prenatal diagnosis. Pediatr Int 41:728–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schleyer TK, Forrest JL (2000) Methods for the design and administration of Web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7:416–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thangaratinam S, Daniels J, Ewer AK et al (2007) Accuracy of pulse oximetry in screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:F176–F180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM et al (2001) Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 103:1269–1273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Valmari P (2007) Should pulse oximetry be used to screen for congenital heart disease? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:F219–F224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ward KE, Pryor RW, Matson JR et al (1990) Delayed detection of coarctation in infancy: implications for timing of newborn follow-up. Pediatrics 86:972–976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Welke KF, Shen I, Ungerleider RM (2006) Current assessment of mortality rates in congenital cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 82:164–170 discussion 170–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L (1999) Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implications for routine examination. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 80:F49–F53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruey-Kang R. Chang
    • 1
  • Sandra Rodriguez
    • 1
  • Thomas S. Klitzner
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of PediatricsHarbor-UCLA Medical CenterTorranceUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of PediatricsUCLA Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations