Advertisement

The Effects of Microplastics on Dolioletta gegenbauri (Tunicata, Thaliacea)

  • Gustav-Adolf PaffenhöferEmail author
  • Marion Köster
Article

Abstract

Oceanographic studies revealed the abundance of minute plastic particles in coastal regions. Such particles, called microplastics, are abundant in sizes smaller than 100 µm ESD (Equivalent Spherical Diameter) and can be collected and ingested by planktonic copepods. Those animals are the most abundant metazoans on our planet. Abundantly co-occurring with planktonic copepods in subtropical and temperate neritic waters are doliolids (Tunicata, Thaliacea), which can dominate subtropical shelves because of their high asexual reproductive performance. Our studies were designed to examine the effects of polystyrene beads at low abundance, compared with phytoplankton, on abundantly occurring gonozooids of Dolioletta gegenbauri. Our findings reveal that such abundance of microplastic particles, in the presence of environmental concentrations of phytoplankton, reduces rates of feeding, growth, and oxygen consumption of this tunicate. Feeding rates on phytoplankton in the presence of beads were reduced by up to 58%, growth rates by up to 85%, and oxygen consumption rates by up to 33%. We conclude that such microplastic particles could limit the often in situ encountered pronounced proliferation of this tunicate species (Deibel in: Bone (ed) The biology of pelagic tunicates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express gratitude to the captain Raymond Sweatte and crew of the R/V Savannah for supporting professionally our efforts to obtain doliolids and copepods during various times during the past years on the southeastern shelf of the United States.

References

  1. Andrady AL (2011) Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Poll Bull 62:1596–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur C, Baker J, Bamford H (eds) (2009) Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects, and fate of microplastic marine Debris. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOS-OR & R-30. NOAA, Silver Spring, Sept. 9–11, 2008, 530Google Scholar
  3. Ayukai T (1987) Discriminate feeding of the calanoid copepod Acartia clausi in mixtures of phytoplankton and inert particles. Mar Biol 94:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole M, Lindeque P, Fileman E, Halsband C, Goodhead R, Moger J, Galloway TS (2013) Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environ Sci Technol 47:6646–6655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole M, Lindeque P, Fileman E, Halsband C, Galloway TS (2015) The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod Calanus helgolandicus. Environ Sci Technol 49:1130–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cozar A, Echevarria F, Gonzalez-Gordillo I, Irigoien X, Ubeda B, Hernandez-Leon S, Palma AT, Navarro S, Garcia-de-Lomas J, Ruiz A, Fernandez-de-Puelles ML, Duarte CM (2014) Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proc Nat Acad Sci 111:10239–10244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deevey GB (1952) Quantity and composition of the zooplankton of Block Island Sound, 1949. Bull Bingham Oceanogr Coll 13:120–164Google Scholar
  8. Deibel D (1985) Blooms of the pelagic tunicate, Dolioletta gegenbauri: Are they associated with Gulf Stream frontal eddies? J Mar Res 43:211–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deibel D (1998) The abundance, distribution, and ecological impact of doliolids. In: Bone Q (ed) The biology of pelagic tunicates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–186Google Scholar
  10. Deibel D, Paffenhöfer G-A (2009) Predictability of patches of neritic salps and doliolids (Tunicata, Thaliacea). J Plankton Res 31:1571–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Mauro R, Kupchik MJ, Benfield MC (2017) Abundant plankton-sized microplastic particles in shelf waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Environ Pollut 230:798–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez F (1979) Particle selection in the nauplius of Calanus pacificus. J Plankton Res 1:313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foley CJ, Feiner CS, Malinich TD, Höök TO (2018) A meta-analysis of the effects of exposure to microplastics on fish and aquatic invertebrates. Sci Total Environ 631–632:550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frost BW (1972) Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol Oceanogr 17:805–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fryer G (1986) Structure, function and behavior and the elucidation of evolution in copepods and other crustaceans. Syllogeus 58:150–157Google Scholar
  16. Gibson DM, Paffenhöfer G-A (2000) Feeding and growth rates of the doliolid, Dolioletta gegenbauri Uljanin (Tunicata, Thaliacea). J Plankton Res 22:1485–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory MR, Andrady AL (2003) Plastics in the marine environment. In: Andrady AL (ed) Plastics and the environment. Wiley, New York, pp 379–401Google Scholar
  18. Huntley ME, Barthel K-G, Star JL (1983) Particle rejection by Calanus pacificus: discrimination between similarly sized particles. Mar Biol 74:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jørgensen CB (1966) Biology of suspension feeding. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 357Google Scholar
  20. Kautsky H (1939) Quenching of luminescence by oxygen. Trans Faraday Soc 35:216–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Köster M, Krause C, Paffenhöfer G-A (2008) Time-series measurements of oxygen consumption of copepod nauplii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 353:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Köster M, Paffenhöfer G-A, Baker CV, Williams JE (2010) Oxygen consumption of doliolids (Tunicata, Thaliacea). J Plankton Res 32:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenz R, Enders K, Nielsen T (2016) Microplastic exposure studies should be environmentally realistic. Proc Nat Acad Sci 113:4121–4122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakamura Y (1998) Blooms of tunicates Oikopleura spp. and Dolioletta gegenbauri in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan, during summer. Hydrobiol 385:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paffenhöfer G-A (1970) Cultivation of Calanus helgolandicus under controlled conditions. Helgoländer wiss Meeresunters 20:346–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paffenhöfer G-A, Gibson DM (1999) Determination of generation time and asexual fecundity of doliolids (Tunicata, Thaliacea). J Plankton Res 21:1183–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paffenhöfer G-A, Lee TN (1987) Development and persistence of patches of Thaliacea. S Afr J Mar Sci 5:305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paffenhöfer G-A, Lewis KD (1990) Perceptive performance and feeding behavior of calanoid copepods. J Plankton Res 12:933–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paffenhöfer G-A, Van Sant KB (1985) The feeding response of a marine planktonic copepod to quantity and quality of particles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 27:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paffenhöfer G-A, Strickler JR, Alcaraz M (1982) Suspension-feeding by herbivorous calanoid copepods: a cinematographic study. Mar Biol 57:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paffenhöfer G-A, Sherman BK, Lee TN (1987) Summer upwelling on the southeastern continental shelf of the U.S.A. during 1981. Distribution and abundance of particulate matter. Prog Oceanogr 19:373–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paffenhöfer G-A, Atkinson LP, Lee TN, Verity PG, Bulluck LR III (1995) Distribution and abundance of thaliaceans and copepods off the southeastern U.S.A. during winter. Cont Shelf Res 15:255–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takahashi K, Ichikawa T, Fukugama C, Yamane M, Kakehi S, Okazaki Y, Kubota H, Furuya K (2015) In situ observations of a doliolid bloom in a warm water filament using a video plankton recorder: bloom development, fate, and effect on biogeochemical cycles and planktonic food webs. Limnol Oceanogr 60:1763–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tebeau CM, Madin LP (1994) Grazing rates for three life history stages of the doliolid Dolioletta gegenbauri Uljanin (Tunicata, Thaliacea). J Plankton Res 16:1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vroom RJE, Koelmans AA, Besseling E, Halsband C (2017) Aging of microplastics promotes their ingestion by marine zooplankton. Environ Pollut 231:987–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, p 620Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Skidaway Institute of OceanographyUniversity of GeorgiaSavannahUSA
  2. 2.Institut für Mikrobiologie, Abteilung Mikrobielle ÖkologieUniversität GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations