Spatial and Temporal Variation of Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Bangalore: A Technology-Intensive Region in India

  • Soumya Devaraj
  • S. TiwariEmail author
  • H. K. Ramaraju
  • U. C. Dumka
  • M. Sateesh
  • P. Parmita
  • G. P. Shivashankara


All of India’s megacities are experiencing acute air pollution problems due to the accelerated urbanization/industrialization and rapid economic growth. Nowadays, environmental pollution due to particulate matter is a major threat to human health and our regional air quality. Long-term air pollution data with the high spatial and temporal resolution are required to understand regional air quality and its effects on environmental degradation and human health. In view of the above, the particulate matter (PM2.5: particles with diameters less than 2.5 μm and PM10: particles with diameters less than 10 μm) were measured from January 2017 to March 2018 at five locations (PM2.5 at 3 sites and PM10: at 2 sites) across the Bangalore city, India. The measured concentrations indicated that PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in Bangalore exceeded the World Health Organization’s air quality standards although the PM2.5 values did meet the Indian National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The PM10 NAAQS was exceeded at one site. Temporal patterns showed a strong evening peak at all sites and morning rush hour peaks of varying strength. Season peaks were observed in the winter or premonsoon seasons again with variations among the five sites. Lower pairwise correlation coefficients among the sites suggest that the PM sources were largely localized. The role of meteorological parameters (MP) was studied, and it was observed that MP play a vital role in the accumulation of PM2.5. During calm wind condition (WS < 0.5 m/s), the concentrations of PM2.5 has increased by 17%, indicating localized sources; however, in the case of PM10, it was opposite. Annually, the highest concentrations of PM2.5 (> 30 μg/ m3) and PM10 (> 75 μg/m3) over receptor side were observed during lower wind speeds (< 2 knots), which indicate that the transportation does not play any crucial role in higher concentrations of PM over Bangalore.



The authors are thankful to the Central Pollution Control Board and Karnataka State Pollution Control Board for allowing to use the air quality data over Bangalore city. The authors sincerely thank the Director, IITM, Pune, for his moral support to complete this analysis.

Supplementary material

244_2019_643_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1375 kb)


  1. Agarwal AK (2007) Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci 33:233–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanco-Becerra LC, Gáfaro-Rojas AI, Rojas-Roa NY (2015) Influence of precipitation scavenging on the PM2.5/PM10 ratio at the Kennedy locality of Bogotá, Colombia. Rev Fac Ing Univ Antioquia 76:58–65Google Scholar
  3. Burtscher H (2005) Physical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: a review. Aerosol Sci 36:896–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinnaswamy AK, Galvez MCD, Balisane H, Nguyen QT, Naguib RNG, Trodd N, Marshall IM, Yaacob N, Santos GNC, Vallar EA, Shaker M, Wickramasinghe N, Ton TN (2016) Air pollution in Bangalore India: an eight-year trend analysis. Int J Environ Technol Management 19:177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demirci E, Cuhadaroglu B (2000) Statistical analysis of wind circulation and air pollution in urban Trabzon. Energy Build 31:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghorani-Azam A, Riahi-Zanjani B, Balali-Mood M (2016) Effects of air pollution on human health and practical measures for prevention in Iran. J Res Med Sci 21:65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilli G, Traversi D, Rovere R, Pignata C, Schilirò T (2007) Airborne particulate matter: ionic species role in different Italian sites. Environ Res 103(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK and New York USA 2013 http://www.ipccch/report/ar5/wg1/. Accessed 2 Jan 2015
  9. Jerrett M (2015) Atmospheric science: the death toll from air-pollution sources. Nature 525(7569):330–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kittelson DB (1998) Engines and nanoparticles: a review. J Aerosol Sci 29(5–6):575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kubilay N, Nickovic S, Moulin C, Dulac F (2000) An illustration of the transport and deposition of mineral dust onto the eastern Mediterranean. Atmos Environ 34:1293–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar P, Khare M, Harrison RM, Bloss WJ, Lewis AC, Coe H, Morawska L (2015) New directions: air pollution challenges for developing megacities like Delhi. Atmos Environ 122:657–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawrence MG, Lelieveld J (2010) Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review. Atmos Chem Phys 10(22):11017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lelieveld J, Evans J, Fnais M, Giannadaki D, Pozzer A (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525(7569):367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maricq MM (2007) Chemical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: a review. Aerosol Sci 38:1079–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mugica V, Ortiz E, Molina LA, Vizcaya-Ruiz D, Nebot A, Quintana R, Aguilar J, Alcántara E (2009) PM composition and source reconciliation in Mexico City. Atmos Environ 3:5068–5074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reşitoğlu IS, Altinişik K, Keskin A (2015) The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust after treatment systems. Clean Technol Environ Pol 17(1):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Satsangi PG, Yadav S (2014) Characterization of PM25 by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectrometer: its relation with different pollution sources. Int J Environ Sci Tech 11:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sugimoto N, Shimizu A, Matsui I, Nishikawa M (2016) A method for estimating the fraction of mineral dust in particulate matter using PM2.5 to PM10 ratios. Particuology 28:114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tai APK, Mickley LJ, Jacob DJ (2010) Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change. Atmos Environ 44:3976–3984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thakur A (2017) Study of ambient air quality trends and analysis of contributing factors in Bengaluru. India. Orient J Chem 33(2):1051–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tiwari S, Bisht DS, Srivastava AK, Pipal AS, Taneja A, Srivastava MK, Attri SD (2014) Variability in atmospheric particulates and meteorological effects on their mass concentrations over Delhi India. Atmos Res 145–146:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tiwari S, Hopke PK, Pipal AS, Srivastava AK, Bisht DS, Tiwari S, Singh AK, Soni VK, Attri SD (2015) Intra-urban variability of particulate matter (PM25 and PM10) and its relationship with optical properties of aerosols over Delhi, India. Atmos Res 166:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tiwari S, Tunved P, Hopke PK, Srivastava AK, Bisht DS, Pandey AK (2016) Observations of ambient trace gas and PM10 concentrations at Patna Central Ganga Basin during 2013–2014: the influence of meteorological variables on atmospheric pollutants. Atmos Res 180:138–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vreeland H, Schauer JJ, Russell AG, Marshall JD, Fushimi A, Jain G, Sethuraman K, Verma V, Tripathi SN, Bergin MH (2016) Chemical characterization and toxicity of particulate matter emissions from roadside trash combustion in urban India. Atmos Environ 147:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision; United Nations (UN): New York 2014 http://www.esaunorg/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlightspdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2015
  27. Yadav R, Sahu LK, Beig G, Tripathi N, Jaaffrey SNA (2017) Ambient particulate matter and carbon monoxide at an urban site of India: influence of anthropogenic emissions and dust storms. Environ Pollut 225:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou X, Cao Z, Ma Y, Wang I, Wu R, Wang W (2016) Concentrations correlations and chemical species of PM25/PM10 based on published data in China: potential implications for the revised particulate standard. Chemosphere 144:518–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soumya Devaraj
    • 1
  • S. Tiwari
    • 2
    • 7
    Email author
  • H. K. Ramaraju
    • 1
  • U. C. Dumka
    • 3
  • M. Sateesh
    • 4
  • P. Parmita
    • 5
  • G. P. Shivashankara
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringDayananda Sagar College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Tropical MeteorologyPuneIndia
  3. 3.Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational SciencesNainitalIndia
  4. 4.Environment Monitoring and Research CentreIndia Meteorological DepartmentNew DelhiIndia
  5. 5.R. S. S. CollegePilkhuwa, HapurIndia
  6. 6.Department of Civil EngineeringP.E.S. College of EngineeringMandyaIndia
  7. 7.DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations